Conciliar “Bishop” Subverts Christ’s Kingship for Naturalistic Humanitarianism in ICE Shooting Narrative

The EWTN News portal reports that the conciliar “bishop” of Austin, Daniel E. Garcia, has exploited the shooting of a Venezuelan national by ICE agents to advance the neo-church’s agenda of religious indifferentism and political naturalism. In a letter dated the very day of the incident, Garcia declared the faithful “living in terror and fear because of the increased activity of ICE agents,” dispensed them from the Sunday Mass obligation — an unprecedented usurpation of divine law — and called for “comprehensive immigration reform” that respects “the rule of law while recognizing the dignity of every person.” This episode manifests the total substitution of the Social Kingship of Christ with Masonic humanitarianism as the operating principle of the conciliar sect.


The Usurpation of Episcopal Authority by a Manifest Heretic

The individual presented as “Bishop Daniel E. Garcia” holds office in the post-conciliar structure occupying the Diocese of Austin. According to the unchanging doctrine of the Church, a “bishop” who adheres to the heresies of Vatican II — religious liberty, false ecumenism, collegiality, and the new ecclesiology — loses his jurisdiction ipso facto by the very fact of manifest heresy, without need of any declaratory sentence. As St. Robert Bellarmine teaches in De Romano Pontifice: “A Pope who is a manifest heretic, by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head, just as he ceases to be a Christian and member of the body of the Church.” The same principle applies to bishops: a manifest heretic cannot be a member of the Church, therefore he cannot be its head in a particular diocese. John of St. Thomas, quoting Bellarmine, confirms: “A heretic is not a member, therefore he cannot be the head of the Church… a manifest heretic cannot be Pope [or bishop]. It cannot be objected that the character remains in him, because if he remained Pope [or bishop] because of the character, since it is indelible, he could never be deposed.”

The “bishop” Garcia, by his public adherence to the conciliar revolution, has defected from the Catholic faith publicly, fulfilling the condition of Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code: “Every office becomes vacant by the mere fact and without any declaration by reason of tacit resignation… if the cleric: 4. Publicly defects from the Catholic faith.” Fr. McDevitt clarifies: “Defection from the faith must be public. It should be noted at once that joining, or enrolling in, a non-Catholic sect is not required to establish the publicity which the canon demands.” The conciliar sect is a non-Catholic sect; its “bishops” are therefore ipso facto vacant from office. Garcia’s “dispensation” from Sunday Mass is thus null, void, and of no effect — an act of a private individual usurping divine authority.

Reduction of the Church’s Mission to Naturalistic Philanthropy

Garcia’s statement — “Regardless of a person’s immigration status, every person is created in the image and likeness of God and possesses an inherent dignity that must always be respected and protected” — while verbally acknowledging the imago Dei, strips it of its supernatural finality. The conciliar sect consistently truncates the doctrine of man’s dignity by severing it from its end: the beatific vision attainable only through the Catholic Church, the sacraments, and the Social Kingship of Christ. Pius XI in Quas Primas declares: “His reign encompasses not only Catholic nations… but His reign encompasses also all non-Christians, so that most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ.” The “dignity” Garcia invokes is the Masonic “dignity of man” — abstract, naturalistic, and divorced from the necessitas medii of the Church. The Syllabus of Errors (Pius IX, 1864) condemns the proposition: “The Church is not a true and perfect society, entirely free… but it appertains to the civil power to define what are the rights of the Church” (Error 19). Garcia’s appeal to “comprehensive immigration reform” and “the rule of law” subordinates the Church’s mission to the secular state, treating the temporal order as autonomous — precisely the error of laicism Pius XI denounces: “When God and Jesus Christ were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed.”

The Dispensation from Sunday Mass: Sacrilege Disguised as Pastoral Care

Garcia’s claim to have “dispensed those who are afraid from the obligation to attend Sunday Mass, calling it an ‘extraordinary step'” constitutes a direct attack on the First and Third Commandments. The obligation to assist at the Most Holy Sacrifice on Sundays and Holy Days is de jure divino and de jure ecclesiastico; no “bishop” — least of all a manifest heretic — can dispense from it for reasons of fear of civil authorities. This is the cura animarum inverted: instead of fortifying the faithful to confess Christ before men (Mt 10:32), the conciliar “pastor” encourages flight from the very source of supernatural strength. Pius XI in Quas Primas warns: “Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ… For what we wrote at the beginning of Our Pontificate about the diminishing authority of law and respect for power… ‘When God and Jesus Christ were removed from laws and states… the entire human society had to be shaken, because it lacked a stable and strong foundation.'” By dispensing from Mass due to ICE operations, Garcia capitulates to the secular power, teaching the faithful that fear of man overrides fear of God. This is the spiritual ruin of souls masquerading as mercy.

False Ecumenism of “Human Dignity” Divorced from Supernatural End

The article notes Garcia’s invocation of National Migration Week: “we are all brothers and sisters. When one person is harmed, all of us are affected.” This is the heresy of universal brotherhood without unity in the Faith, condemned by Pius XI in Mortalium Animos (1928) and implicit in the Syllabus (Error 16: “Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation”). The conciliar sect’s “fraternity” is the Masonic liberté, égalité, fraternité baptized with Christian vocabulary. Lamentabili Sane Exitu (1907) condemns the Modernist proposition: “The dogmas of faith should be understood according to their practical function, i.e., as binding in action, rather than as principles of belief” (Prop. 26). Garcia reduces the Faith to social activism — “comprehensive immigration reform” replaces the Great Commission (Mt 28:19-20). The “dignity” he champions is the idol of the “human person” abstracted from original sin, redemption, and the necessity of the Church. As Pius XII teaches in Mystici Corporis: “Only those are to be included as members of the Church who have been baptized and profess the true faith…” The Venezuelan national’s eternal salvation — not his temporal safety from deportation — is the suprema lex. Garcia’s silence on the state of his soul, the necessity of baptism, confession, and the Holy Mass, betrays the apostasy of the conciliar “clergy”.

Submission to Secular Power: The Syllabus Condemned Errors in Action

Garcia demands that “federal, state, and city authorities be ‘transparent and honest about what occurred.'” The Syllabus condemns: “The ecclesiastical power ought not to exercise its authority without the permission and assent of the civil government” (Error 20) and “In the case of conflicting laws enacted by the two powers, the civil law prevails” (Error 42). By appealing to the secular state for “transparency” and “reform,” Garcia acknowledges the state as the supreme arbiter, inverting the divine order. Pius XI in Quas Primas insists: “The state must leave the same freedom to the members of Orders and Congregations… The annual celebration of this solemnity will also remind states that not only private individuals, but also rulers and governments have the duty to publicly honor Christ and obey Him.” The conciliar “bishop” does the opposite: he begs the state for crumbs of justice while ignoring the Kingship of Christ over the state itself. This is the essence of laicism: the Church reduced to an NGO lobbying the secular power.

The Masonic Blueprint: Erasing the Distinction Between Church and State

The article’s framing — ICE vs. migrant, “bishop” vs. DHS, “human rights” vs. “rule of law” — reflects the Masonic dialectic that has governed the West since 1789. The False Fatima Apparitions file documents the “Masonic Operation ‘Fatima'” with its “Symbolism of dates: 1717 (founding of Freemasonry), 1917 (apparitions), 2017 (canonization) – ritualistic 200-year cycles” and “Disinformation strategy: Stage 3 (1958-2000): Takeover of the narrative by modernists, concealment of the Third Secret, ecumenical reinterpretation.” The conciliar sect’s immigration narrative is Stage 4: the weaponization of “human dignity” to dissolve nations, the civitas Dei replaced by the civitas terrena of the Masonic “universal republic.” Garcia’s “comprehensive immigration reform” is the political arm of the ecumenical heresy: one world, one religion (humanitarianism), under the antichrist. The Syllabus condemns: “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (Error 80). The conciliar “popes” and “bishops” have done exactly this.

Symptomatic Conclusion: The Conciliar Sect as Instrument of Antichrist

The entire episode — the shooting, the “bishop’s” letter, the DHS rebuttal, the EWTN reportage — is a theater of the absurd staged within the abomination of desolation. The conciliar “bishop” dispenses from the Mass; the secular state claims to provide “the best medical care he’s ever received”; the “lawyer” disputes facts; the media amplifies. Nowhere is Christ the King mentioned. Nowhere the Social Reign of the Sacred Heart. Nowhere the necessity of the Church for salvation. Nowhere the doctrine of the two powers (Gelasius I: Duo sunt, imperator, quibus principaliter mundus hic regitur: auctoritas sacra pontificum et regia potestas). The conciliar sect has fulfilled the prophecy of St. Pius X in Pascendi: “The Modernists… aim at such a development of dogmas as appears to be their corruption.” Garcia is a functionary of the paramasonic structure, his “pastoral care” a sacrilegious parody of the munus regendi. The true Church — the Ecclesia militans of Tradition — condemns this spectacle, prays for the conversion of the Venezuelan soul, and awaits the Restoration of All Things in Christ (Eph 1:10), when omne genu flectatur (Phil 2:10) before the only King, Jesus Christ, Rex Regum et Dominus Dominantium.


Source:
Bishop of Austin decries ICE shooting as federal officials say man fled arrest
  (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 22.09.2026

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top
Antichurch.org
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.