The EWTN News portal reports that the usurper Robert Prevost, styling himself “Pope” Leo XIV, addressed the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) in Paris on September 25, 2026, delivering a speech that epitomizes the apostasy of the conciliar sect: the substitution of the Social Kingship of Christ with a vapid, naturalistic “humanism” dialoguing with the very Masonic institutions condemned by the immutable Magisterium. The antipope praised UNESCO as a “privileged partner in the service of the common good,” invoking a fictitious “encyclical” *Magnifica Humanitas*, while reducing the Incarnation to a mere motif for “dialogue” and “peace” devoid of the *regnum Christi*. This is not a pastoral visit; it is the ritualistic consecration of the *abomination of desolation* enthroned in the place of the Holy See.
The Antipope as Prophet of the “Cult of Man”
The speech delivered by the false pope at the Masonic headquarters of UNESCO is a masterpiece of Modernist deception. He speaks of a “corruption of culture” in the age of Artificial Intelligence, yet he himself is the supreme architect of that corruption. By entering the “public square” of a UN agency—an entity founded upon the principles of religious indifferentism, naturalism, and the separation of Church and State solemnly condemned in the *Syllabus of Errors* (Props. 55, 77, 78)—the usurper performs the liturgy of the new religion: the *cult of man*.
Pius XI, in *Quas Primas*, thundered: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” Leo XIV does not call UNESCO to submit to the *King of Kings*; he flatters it. He does not demand the *public reign of Christ*; he offers the conciliar sect as a “privileged partner” for the “common good”—a Masonic counterfeit of the *bonum commune* which, divorced from the *finis ultimus* (the glory of God and the salvation of souls), is merely the tranquility of order in a Christless society. The antipope’s rhetoric about “human dignity” rooted in “lived experience” is pure phenomenological Modernism, condemned by St. Pius X in *Lamentabili Sane Exitu* (Prop. 58: “Truth changes with man, because it develops with him, in him, and through him”) and *Pascendi Dominici Gregis*. There is no “dignity” apart from the *imago Dei* restored by grace; to speak of it at UNESCO is to prostitute the Bride of Christ to the kings of the earth.
UNESCO: The “Synagogue of Satan” Welcomed as “Privileged Partner”
The choice of venue is theologically definitive. UNESCO is the intellectual arm of the Masonic Tower of Babel—the very “synagogue of Satan” denounced by Leo XIII in *Humanum Genus* and Pius IX in the *Syllabus* (Prop. 55: “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church”—a proposition condemned, meaning the Church must not be separated). This organization exists to construct a “civilization of love” without the *Author of Love*, a “peace” without the *Prince of Peace*.
The antipope’s reference to the “Book of Peace Memorandum” (1949) and the watering of an olive tree are Masonic rituals par excellence. He stands in the temple of the “Grand Architect” and offers incense to the idol of “Humanity.” Pius XI warned in *Quas Primas*: “The state must leave the same freedom to the members of Orders… who are indeed the most valiant helpers of the Pastors of the Church and contribute most to the expansion and establishment of Christ’s Kingdom.” The antipope does the opposite: he surrenders the Kingdom to the “paramasonic structure” of the UN. His “dialogue” is the colloquium of the harlot with the beast (Apoc. 17:3). He legitimizes the very powers that “think that they have already become masters of the world” (Pius IX, *Quanta Cura* / *Syllabus* intro), the sects that “wind through sinuous caverns… deceiving many with astute frauds.”
The “Tower of Babel” vs. Pentecost: A False Dichotomy
The usurper contrasts the “domination and confusion of the Tower of Babel” (which he likens to AI) with the “peace and unity found at Pentecost.” This is a sleight of hand worthy of the Father of Lies. The true Tower of Babel is the conciliar church itself—ecclesia haereticorum—which, since 1958, has built a tower of doctrinal confusion (“hermeneutic of continuity,” “evolution of dogma,” “religious liberty”) to reach heaven by its own lights, refusing the *lex credendi* of Tradition. The “Pentecost” he invokes is not the descent of the Holy Ghost upon the Apostles to convert nations to the *one true Faith* (Acts 2:38-41), but the pentecost of the “spirit of the Council”—a chaotic, charismatic, ecumenical spirit that “blows where it wills” (John 3:8) to destroy the *unity of the Faith*.
St. Cyril of Alexandria, cited in *Quas Primas*, teaches that Christ’s dominion is “not by force but by essence and nature” (*ex essentia et natura*). The antipope’s “Pentecost” is a purely horizontal, immanent “message of peace received as good news by people of every nation”—a naturalistic, humanitarian solidarity. He speaks of the “resurrection of Jesus” not as the foundation of His *exaltation at the right hand of the Father* (Eph. 1:20-22) whence He rules the nations with a rod of iron (Ps. 2:9), but as a vague “victory of life over death” that “gives hope.” This is the “dogmaless Christianity” (Prop. 65, *Lamentabili*)—Protestantism masquerading as Catholicism.
Silence on the Kingship of Christ: The Gravest Omission
The most damning evidence of the antipope’s apostasy is what he omits. In an address to a global body claiming authority over “culture,” “education,” and “science,” there is not a single mention of the Social Kingship of Christ. Not a word on the duty of states to publicly profess the Catholic Faith (Pius XI, *Quas Primas*; Leo XIII, *Immortale Dei*; Pius IX, *Syllabus* Props. 21, 77). Not a syllable on the *rights of God* (*jura Dei*) which precede and ground all “human rights.”
Pius XI instituted the Feast of Christ the King precisely “to address the needs of the present times and provide a special remedy against the plague that poisons human society. And this plague is the secularism of our times, so-called laicism.” The antipope Leo XIV, speaking at the very citadel of that laicism (UNESCO), administers not the remedy but the poison. He validates the secularist premise: that the Church is merely one “voice” among many in the “public square,” a “partner” for the “common good” defined by Masonic naturalism. This is the heresy of Americanism and Liberal Catholicism condemned by Leo XIII (*Testem Benevolentiae*) and St. Pius X (*Notre Charge Apostolique*), now elevated to the level of a “papal” program.
The “Encyclical” *Magnifica Humanitas*: A Forgery of the False Magisterium
The citation of a putative encyclical *Magnifica Humanitas* (“Magnificent Humanity”) reveals the very essence of the antichurch: the deification of Man. A true encyclical would be *Magnifica Divinitas* or *Regnum Christi*. This title alone condemns the document as a manifesto of the Religion of Humanity foretold by the prophets of Modernism (Comte, Loisy, Teilhard de Chardin) and realized in the conciliar sect. The “Holy See” of the usurpers “looks upon this Organization as a privileged partner in the service of the common good, which is the ‘social expression of the dignity’ shared by all of us.” This is the heresy of the common good separated from the Supreme Good. As St. Thomas teaches, bonum commune divinum est Deus (the divine common good is God). To serve a “common good” with UNESCO is to serve an idol.
AI and the “Meaning of Human Life”: The Incompetence of the Usurper
The antipope states: “Although such systems can correlate data, they cannot answer questions that concern the meaning of human life, which is rooted in lived experience.” This is a disastrous theological error. The meaning of human life is not “rooted in lived experience” (Modernist immanentism, condemned in *Lamentabili* Props. 20, 25, 58). It is rooted in the objective truth of the Creed: “For us men and for our salvation He came down from heaven.” The meaning of life is to know, love, and serve God in this world, and to be happy with Him forever in the next (Baltimore Catechism). By locating meaning in “lived experience,” the antipope validates the subjectivist anthropology of the Enlightenment and the New Age. He has no authority to teach, for he holds no office. As St. Robert Bellarmine teaches (*De Romano Pontifice*, cited in *Defense of Sedevacantism*): “A manifest heretic… by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head, just as he ceases to be a Christian and member of the body of the Church.” Robert Prevost, by adhering to the Modernist Vatican II sect, is a manifest heretic; his “teaching” is ipso facto null, void, and of no effect (*Cum ex Apostolatus Officio*).
The “Vulnerable” as Human Shields for the Antichrist
The antipope’s litany of the vulnerable—”children in their mothers’ wombs… persons with disabilities… the elderly, migrants and refugees”—is cynically exploited. While the conciliar sect has for decades facilitated the slaughter of the unborn through its “dialogue” with pro-abortion governments and UN agencies (UNFPA, WHO), and while its “bishops” deny the Faith to the dying by administering invalid “sacraments” (Novus Ordo “Mass,” new rites of ordination), the usurper weeps crocodile tears at UNESCO. He speaks of “inalienable dignity” judged by “efficiency,” yet his sect has embraced the “throwaway culture” by accepting the New Mass (a Protestantized meal), religious liberty (the right to error), and ecumenism (the equality of truth and falsehood). Corruptio optimi pessima. The concern for the vulnerable is the humanitarian alibi for the spiritual genocide of souls.
Canon 188.4 and the Vacancy of the See
The very fact that a manifest heretic occupies the Vatican, recognized by the world as “Pope,” is the signum magnum of the Great Apostasy (2 Thess. 2:3). Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code (cited in *Defense of Sedevacantism*) declares: “Every office becomes vacant by the mere fact and without any declaration… if the cleric: … 4. Publicly defects from the Catholic faith.” The “pope” who visits UNESCO, praises religious liberty, and teaches a “humanism” rooted in experience has publicly defected. The See is vacant. The “Church” speaking at UNESCO is the conciliar sect, the “Church of the New Advent,” the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place (Matt. 24:15).
Conclusion: Return to the King, Reject the Usurper
The speech at UNESCO is not a “warning” about AI; it is a manifesto of the Antichrist’s interim religion. It proves that the structures occupying the Vatican are the paramasonic structure foretold by Leo XIII and Pius X. The only remedy is the one Pius XI prescribed: “The annual celebration of this solemnity will also remind states that not only private individuals, but also rulers and governments have the duty to publicly honor Christ and obey Him.” (Quas Primas). Catholics must reject the antipope, his false “encyclicals,” his Masonic “dialogue,” and his naturalistic “humanism.” They must cleave to the Tradition of the Fathers, the Tridentine Mass, the Social Kingship of Christ, and the bishops and priests who maintain valid orders and the integral Faith sine ulla novitate. Non praevalebunt (Matt. 16:18). The gates of hell shall not prevail against the true Church, which is not the conciliar sect, but the Ecclesia Militans faithful to the Chair of Peter—vacant since 1958, awaiting the true Vicar of Christ who will restore all things in Christ (*Instaurare omnia in Christo*).
Source:
Pope Leo XIV warns of ‘corruption of culture’ in the age of AI (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 25.09.2026