The National Catholic Register portal reports on an in-flight press conference aboard the papal flight from Metz, France, to Rome on September 28, 2026, wherein the usurper “Pope” Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) declares he is not in “panic mode” regarding existential threats posed by artificial intelligence, defends his intervention against France’s euthanasia laws as mere “application of the Gospel,” and recharacterizes the clerical abuse crisis as a “human problem” rather than a systemic ecclesial catastrophe. The entire performance manifests a naturalistic, bureaucratic mentality utterly devoid of the supernatural sensus Catholicus, confirming the conciliar sect’s total capitulation to the spirit of the world.
The Antichrist’s Vicar Sleeps Soundly While the World Burns
The most damning utterance proceeds directly from the mouth of the antipope: “If someone were to ask me, am I in panic mode, no I’m not, I sleep at night.” Here is the perfect distillation of the post-conciliar anti-papacy: a false shepherd untroubled by the wolves devouring the flock, because he does not believe in the wolf, nor in the flock, nor in the Shepherd. Qui timet non timet (he who fears does not fear) — but the true Vicar of Christ would tremble timor Domini (fear of the Lord) at the prospect of technologies that threaten to obliterate the imago Dei in man, to substitute algorithmic simulation for divine providence, to erect a new Tower of Babel in silicon.
Pius XI, in Quas Primas, thundered: “When God and Jesus Christ were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed… the entire human society had to be shaken, because it lacked a stable and strong foundation.” Leo XIV’s equanimity before the “more than 10% chance that AI could kill all humans within a decade” (per the Anthropic researcher) reveals that his authority derives from men — from tech CEOs, from political summits, from the “dialogue” he boasts of organizing — not from God. He treats the potential annihilation of the human race as a regulatory challenge, a matter for “commissions” and “study,” not as a sign of the times demanding penitentiam agite (do penance).
The encyclical Magnifica Humanitas — the very title a blasphemous inversion of Magnificat, exalting man where the Church exalts God — is exposed by its author’s own admission as a document of dialogue, not of truth. “We have to keep working. We can’t just sit back and pretend nothing is going to happen.” This is the language of the NGO, not the Prince of the Apostles. Where is the condemnation of the hubris that seeks to create ex nihilo a rival to divine intelligence? Where is the anathema against the Promethean madness that would replace the Logos with the algorithm? Nowhere. The antipope “sleeps at night” because his conscience is seared (cauterizatum, 1 Tim 4:2) and his god is this world.
Laïcité as Idol: The Gospel Reduced to Social Work
Confronted with the charge of violating France’s sacred laïcité by opposing euthanasia, the antipope retorts: “I didn’t cross it, because we’re not entering into politics; we’re applying the Gospel to people’s lives.” This is the heresy of political Augustinianism inverted: the City of God is reduced to a humanitarian NGO, the Kingship of Christ to a “value affirmation” for the suffering. Pius XI explicitly condemned this reduction: “The state must leave the same freedom to the members of Orders and Congregations… who contribute most to the expansion and establishment of Christ’s Kingdom, either by combating the triple concupiscence of the world through religious vows, or by striving for perfection.” The Kingdom is not of this world (Jn 18:36), yet the antipope seeks its validation in the corridors of the Élysée Palace.
His reference to Lourdes — “people are searching for something much deeper and understanding that their lives, even in the midst of sickness or disability or pain of different kinds, that their life has meaning” — is a masterpiece of therapeutic deism. No mention of redemptive suffering, of co-redemption, of the thesaurus Ecclesiae (treasury of the Church), of indulgences, of the Communion of Saints. Only a vague “meaning” that “holds for all of us.” This is the anthropocentric turn of Vatican II’s Gaudium et Spes brought to its logical conclusion: Christ the King dethroned, Christ the Social Worker enthroned. The Syllabus of Pius IX condemns the proposition: “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church” (Error 55). The antipope obeys the error while pretending to transcend it.
The Abyss of Impenitence: Abuse as “Human Problem”
On the clerical abuse crisis, the antipope’s evasion is diabolical in its precision: “Sexual abuse is first and foremost a human problem… When it happens within the Church it actually has another whole dimension added to it.” Primo, secundo, tertio: First, it is a sin crying to heaven for vengeance (Gen 18:20), a sacrilege against the character indelebilis of Holy Orders, a profanation of the very mysteria the priest is ordained to guard. Second, it is systemic because the conciliar sect’s “priesthood” is invalid — the new rite of ordination (1968) lacks the form and intention for the sacramental priesthood, producing mere functionaries who act in persona nobody. Third, the “healing” the antipope offers is the healing of the world: therapy, compensation, “listening” — never absolution, never penance, never conversion.
St. Robert Bellarmine, cited in the defense of sedevacantism, teaches: “A manifest heretic cannot be Pope… he cannot be the head of something of which he is not a member.” The antipope’s refusal to name the abuse as systemic — preferring the bureaucratic euphemism “some organizations within the Church have, at times, as a system, been abusive” — is the speech of a CEO managing liability, not a Father judging souls. The Syllabus condemns: “The civil government… has a right to an indirect negative power over religious affairs” (Error 41). The conciliar sect has internalized this error: it submits to civil courts, civil norms, civil “best practices,” because it has no supernatural jurisdiction left to exercise.
The Masonic Technocracy: Trump, Amodei, and the “Dialogue” of Darkness
The article’s casual mention of Trump dining with Amodei to “address their differences” over AI regulation, framed as context for the antipope’s own “commission,” reveals the true architecture of power. The “Vatican commission on AI” is a mimicry of the Masonic lodges that have always sought to direct technological development toward the Novus Ordo Seclorum. The name “Leo XIV” itself — echoing Leo XIII’s Rerum Novarum and the Masonic “Leo Taxil” hoax — signals the continuity of the opus contra Ecclesiam.
The “Miracle of the Sun” at Fatima was exposed in the provided context as “mass optical manipulation (natural phenomenon) and mass panic and autosuggestion” — a prototype for the AI-driven deepfakes and mass psychological engineering now being perfected. The antipope’s “Magnifica Humanitas” and his “commission” are Stage 4 of the same operation: global governance of the synthetic mind. He does not condemn the simulacrum; he seeks to “regulate” it. Non possumus (we cannot) serve two masters.
Theological Bankruptcy: No Christ, No Cross, No Crown
Read the entire transcript: not one mention of sin, grace, hell, judgment, the Blessed Virgin, the Rosary, the Mass, the Sacraments. Only “dialogue,” “regulation,” “commissions,” “healing,” “values,” “meaning.” This is the abomination of desolation (Mt 24:15) standing in the holy place: a religious structure that speaks the language of the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, the Trilateral Commission.
Pius X in Lamentabili Sane Exitu condemned the Modernist proposition: “Christ did not proclaim any specific, all-encompassing doctrine suitable for all times and peoples, but rather initiated a certain religious movement, applied or applicable to different times and places” (Prop. 59). Leo XIV embodies this condemned heresy: he “applies the Gospel” to AI, to euthanasia, to abuse, as a movement adapts to circumstances. But the Gospel is not a policy toolkit; it is the power of God unto salvation (Rom 1:16).
The antipope’s “sleep at night” is the sleep of the dead. “Woe to you that are secure in Zion… that lie upon beds of ivory… but are not grieved for the affliction of Joseph” (Amos 6:1, 6). The true Church, the Ecclesia militans persevering in the catacombs of Tradition, keeps vigil. Vigilate et orate (Mt 26:41). The night is far spent; the day of the Parousia draws near. No commission, no dialogue, no “Magnifica Humanitas” will stay the hand of the Almighty. Christus vincit, Christus regnat, Christus imperat.
Source:
Pope Leo Says He Is Not ‘In Panic Mode’ Over AI Dangers (ncregister.com)
Date: 28.09.2026