Apostolic Journey or Apostasy? Turkey Visit Exposes Conciliar Sect’s Betrayal of Catholic Faith
The Catholic News Agency portal (November 24, 2025) reports on growing anticipation for antipope Leo XIV’s visit to Turkey, framing it as a historic ecumenical event. The article quotes “Levantine” Linda Tito celebrating this “sign of unity” allowing her to “feel fully part of the universal Church,” while Chaldean Bedri Diril claims it will strengthen ties with Orthodox schismatics. Greek Orthodox Teodora Hacuni praises the 1,700th anniversary of Nicaea as an opportunity for “church unity,” applauding Catholic handover of Santa Maria Church to Orthodox communities. Ceramic artist Mesude Künen prepares a miniature of İznik’s walls for the antipope, symbolizing the naturalistic reduction of faith to cultural artifact.
Ecumenical Syncretism as Grave Violation of Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus
The article’s central thesis – that antipapal visits advance Christian unity – constitutes blasphemous rejection of the dogma Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus defined at the Fourth Lateran Council (1215). When Bedri Diril speaks of “achieving the unity of the one church in Christ Jesus, as in the first centuries,” he ignores the Council of Florence’s decree Laetentur Caeli (1439): “The Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that all those who are outside the Catholic Church… cannot share in eternal life.” The conciliar sect’s embrace of Orthodox schismatics as “sisters Churches” directly contravenes Pius IX’s Syllabus of Errors condemning those who claim “Protestantism is nothing more than another form of the same true Christian religion” (Error 18).
“It is wonderful that he can also see us, know that we exist and that we love him.” (Linda Tito)
This emotionalist rhetoric substitutes supernatural faith with natural sentimentality, exemplifying Modernist subjectivism condemned by St. Pius X in Lamentabili Sane: “Revelation was merely man’s self-awareness of his relationship to God” (Proposition 20). The absence of any reference to conversion of non-Catholics or the Social Kingship of Christ reveals the apostate nature of this “ecumenical dialogue.”
Desecration of Nicaean Anniversary for Anti-Catholic Agenda
The 1,700th anniversary of the First Council of Nicaea – which defined Christ’s divinity against Arian heretics – is perverted into an occasion for syncretism. Teodora Hacuni’s gratitude for Catholic churches being “granted” to Orthodox communities constitutes material cooperation with schism, violating Canon 1258 of the 1917 Code. Pius XI’s encyclical Mortalium Animos (1928) explicitly forbade such actions: “The unity of Christians cannot be otherwise fostered than by promoting the return to the one true Church of Christ of those who are separated from it.”
The article’s focus on İznik (ancient Nicaea) as mere cultural heritage – exemplified by Künen’s miniature city walls – reduces the Council’s dogmatic decrees to archaeological artifacts. This aligns with Modernist historicism condemned in Lamentabili Sane: “The principal articles of the Apostles’ Creed did not have the same meaning for the first Christians as they do for contemporary Christians” (Proposition 62).
Naturalistic Humanism Replacing Supernatural Faith
Nowhere does the article mention Christ’s Kingship, the necessity of submission to Roman Pontiffs, or the Four Last Things. Instead, we find purely natural expectations: Diril’s “moral support and courage” for minorities, Tito’s desire to “feel” included, Hacuni’s “guiding light” of interfaith cooperation. Pius XI’s Quas Primas (1925) anathematizes this naturalism: “When men are… unwilling to acknowledge the kingship of Christ, not only do they drag themselves down to the level of the irrational creatures, but they fall even lower.”
The impending sacrilege at St. Charbel’s tomb – where an antipope will pretend to offer valid prayers – completes this diabolical inversion. As the Syllabus declares: “Roman pontiffs have… usurped the rights of princes” (Error 23) when claiming authority over baptized heretics and schismatics.
Conclusion: Masonic Operation Against the Remnant
This spectacle follows the Masonic “False Fatima” playbook analyzed in our documents: Stage 3 “Takeover of the narrative by modernists… ecumenical reinterpretation.” Like the “Miracle of the Sun” hoax, antipope Leo XIV’s visit manufactures false hope through psychological manipulation. True Catholics must heed Pius IX’s warning in Syllabus Error 80: “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” is condemned. The only proper response is non possumus – we cannot participate in this apostasy.
Source:
As Pope Leo XIV’s visit to Turkey nears, anticipation grows among local communities (catholicnewsagency.com)
Date: 24.11.2025