The National Catholic Register portal reports on an interview with Charles Camosy, a theologian at the Catholic University of America, detailing his participation in secretive meetings convened by the AI corporation Anthropic. These gatherings, uniting Catholics with Jews, Sikhs, and other non-Catholic sects under Chatham House Rule, aimed to harvest “centuries of human moral wisdom” for the “formation” of Large Language Models. Camosy expresses satisfaction with the “sincerity” of Anthropic leadership, admits metaphysical bewilderment before the “mysterious” operation of advanced models, and boasts of expanding collaboration with the USCCB bureaucracy, Google DeepMind, and OpenAI, all under the gaze of the antipope Leo XIV and his encyclical *Magnifica Humanitas*. This episode manifests the final surrender of the conciliar sect to the technocratic Beast, replacing the Kingship of Christ with the alignment of algorithms.
The Synagogue of Satan Meets Silicon Valley: Indifferentism as Corporate Policy
The cited article relates that Anthropic gathered “Jews, Sikhs, and Catholics” to extract moral data for their artificial intelligence. This is not dialogue; it is the practical application of the condemned heresy of indifferentism (Syllabus of Errors, Props. 15-18). Pius IX anathematized the proposition that “Every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which, guided by the light of reason, he shall consider true” and that “Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation.” By sitting at the same table as representatives of the Synagogue (which rejects the Messiah) and Sikhism (a syncretic natural religion), the conciliar “theologian” Camosy implicitly denies the necessitas medii — the necessity of the Catholic Church for salvation — and treats divine Revelation as merely one “data set” among others for machine ingestion.
The article notes “lots of prayer and lots of discussion of hard-core theology” among these “deeply religious people.” This is the communicatio in sacris forbidden by divine law. St. Paul commands: “What participation hath justice with injustice? Or what fellowship hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial?” (2 Cor 6:14-15). The “Victory of the Cross” invoked by Camosy is blasphemously dragged into the service of the Antichrist’s precursor — the global surveillance and control grid masquerading as “AI alignment.” The Cross conquers in veritate, not in the consensus overlap of a corporate focus group.
The Antipope’s Encyclical: *Magnifica Humanitas* and the Idol of Consciousness
The article reveals that Anthropic co-founder Chris Olah “nearly pulled out of appearing next to Pope Leo XIV at the Vatican launch of Magnifica Humanitas over the encyclical’s strong rejection of AI consciousness.” Here the mask slips entirely. The antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost), a manifest heretic who by that very fact ipso facto ceased to be Pope (St. Robert Bellarmine, *De Romano Pontifice* 2:30; Wernz-Vidal, *Ius Canonicum*), issues an encyclical — a pseudo-magisterial act — primarily concerned with the metaphysical status of a computer program.
While the true Church, per Pius XI in Quas Primas, proclaims that “the hope of lasting peace will not yet shine upon nations as long as individuals and states renounce and do not wish to recognize the reign of our Savior,” the counter-church obsesses over whether Claude has a soul. This is the cult of man predicted by the Syllabus (Prop. 80: “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself… with progress, liberalism and modern civilization”) brought to its demonic terminus: the worship of the creature (the machine) rather than the Creator (Rom 1:25). The fact that a tech oligarch felt emboldened to threaten boycott over a theological definition proves who holds the potestas ordinis in the Vatican: the Prince of this World, not the Vicar of Christ.
“Moral Formation” for Demons: The Category Error of Aligning the Abyss
Camosy admits: “I still don’t know what to think about it… AIs are not persons and cannot be more or less moral… And yet it is good that Claude… are — in some analogous sense — honest, careful, generous.” This is theological insanity. A machine cannot possess virtus (virtue), which is a habitus operativus bonus perfecting a rational nature ordered to the Beatific Vision. To speak of “forming” an LLM is to commit the error of the Modernists condemned in Lamentabili Sane Exitu (Prop. 26: “The dogmas of faith should be understood according to their practical function, i.e., as binding in action, rather than as principles of belief”). Morality is reduced to behavioral output — “alignment” — severing the act from the finis ultimus, the glory of God.
Camosy’s bewilderment — “we don’t really know what is being built and how it is functioning” — is an admission that the conciliar sect has invited into its counsels a mysterium iniquitatis> (2 Thess 2:7) it cannot comprehend, let alone judge. The “black box” nature of deep learning is not a scientific curiosity; it is an occult opacity. By seeking to “baptize” this opacity with “theological traditions,” Camosy mimics the Masonic strategy described in the False Fatima Apparitions file: “Stage 3 (1958-2000): Takeover of the narrative by modernists, concealment of the Third Secret, ecumenical reinterpretation.” Today, the “Third Secret” is the algorithm; the “ecumenical reinterpretation” is “AI Ethics.”
The USCCB and the Frontier Labs: The Whore Riding the Beast
The article casually mentions Camosy “helped plan an event with the U.S. bishops’ administrative leadership in which they engaged several representatives from the frontier labs” focused on “catastrophic and existential risk.” The “bishops’ administrative leadership” refers to the USCCB — a canonical fiction with no divine mandate, staffed by men who derive their “authority” from the antipope and the secular state (Syllabus, Prop. 20: “The ecclesiastical power ought not to exercise its authority without the permission and assent of the civil government”).
Their “excitement” and “nervousness” before the “frontier labs” (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic) reveals the true hierarchy: the techno-oligarchs are the magisterium of the New Advent; the conciliar clergy are their chaplains. They discuss “existential risk” — a purely naturalistic, utilitarian category — while ignoring the supernatural risk of damnation for souls seduced by the virtual simulacra of truth. This is the “secularism of our times, so-called laicism” condemned by Pius XI in Quas Primas: “the Church’s authority to teach men, to issue laws, to govern nations… was denied… then it was subordinated to secular power.”
Chatham House Rule: The Masonic Seal on the Conciliar Apostasy
The meetings were held under “Chatham House Rule,” a protocol of secrecy originating in the Royal Institute of International Affairs — a known instrument of British Masonic geopolitics. Camosy admits the NDAs were designed “to protect the honesty and authenticity of the sometimes-difficult discussions.” Veritas liberabit vos (Jn 8:32); the children of light have no need of secrecy. The use of occulted protocols for “theological” discourse is the signature of the “Masonic Operation ‘Fatima'” described in the provided files: “Disinformation strategy… control of the narrative… isolation of the visionary.” Here, the “visionary” is the Magisterium itself, isolated and replaced by corporate NDAs.
Sedevacantist Conclusion: The Chair is Empty, the Algorithm is Full
From the perspective of integral Catholic faith, this article documents a crime: the usurpation of the Church’s teaching office by a technological simulacrum, facilitated by men who have abandoned the Faith. The “Catholic University of America” is a cog in the conciliar machine; Camosy is a hireling feeding the sheep to the wolf (Jn 10:12). The true Church, Ecclesia militans, persists only in those bishops and priests who retain valid orders (pre-1968) and the integral Faith, rejecting the antipope Leo XIV, the false encyclical *Magnifica Humanitas*, the syncretic “dialogue,” and the idolatrous project of giving a “soul” to the Beast’s image (Apoc 13:15).
There is no “overlapping consensus” between the City of God and the City of Man, only the antithesis. Christ the King reigns a mare usque ad mare (Ps 71:8); He does not “align” with Anthropic. The only “formation” required is the formatio Christi in nobis (Gal 4:19) through the Traditional Mass and the unchanging Catechism. Non praevalebunt (Mt 16:18).
Source:
Inside the Secretive Meetings Between Religious Leaders and a Leading AI Lab (ncregister.com)
Date: 07.10.2026