The organ of the conciliar sect, Vatican News, reports that “Archbishop” Christophe El Kassis, the Permanent Observer of the counterfeit “Holy See” to the Masonic United Nations, addressed the Third Committee of the 81st General Assembly on October 7, 2026. He praised the twentieth anniversary of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, extolling “self-determination,” “cultural development,” and a “culture of care,” while citing the antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) as a spiritual authority. This intervention constitutes a formal renunciation of the Social Kingship of Christ the King, substituting the supernatural mission of the Church for a naturalistic, Masonic humanitarianism that flatters the enemies of God.
The Usurped Seat at the Masonic Assembly
The very presence of a representative of the post-conciliar structure at the United Nations—an organization founded upon the principles of naturalism and indifferentism explicitly condemned by Pope Pius IX in the Syllabus Errorum (errors 39, 55, 77, 80)—is a scandalous manifestation of the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place. The “Holy See” of the neo-church has not merely “dialogued” with the powers of this world; it has prostrated itself before them, seeking a seat at the table of the synagogue of Satan (Apoc. 2:9).
Pius XI, in Quas Primas, teaches that “the State must leave the same freedom to the members of Orders and Congregations… who are indeed the most valiant helpers of the Pastors of the Church and contribute most to the expansion and establishment of Christ’s Kingdom”, and that “rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ”. The “Permanent Observer” does not demand the public veneration of Christ the King by the UN; he demands “respect” for indigenous “spiritualities” (plural) within the framework of a Masonic charter. This is not the libertas Ecclesiae; it is the capitulation of the counterfeit hierarchy to the Civitas Diaboli.
Reduction of the Church’s Mission to Naturalistic Humanism
The address is saturated with the vocabulary of secular philanthropy: “human rights,” “common good,” “justice,” “fraternal world,” “culture of care.” Nowhere is the name of Our Lord Jesus Christ invoked as the sole Savior, the sole Lawgiver, the sole King of nations. The “common good” cited by El Kassis is not the Bonum Commune of St. Thomas Aquinas—ordered to the ultimate end of eternal beatitude—but the Masonic “common good” of temporal peace and material prosperity divorced from the Reign of Christ.
Pius XI condemns this precise error: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed… the entire human society had to be shaken, because it lacked a stable and strong foundation” (Quas Primas, citing Ubi Arcano). The “Archbishop” speaks of “past wounds” and “reconciliation” but is silent on the wound of Original Sin, the necessity of Baptism for salvation (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus), and the duty of the Church to convert the nations, not merely to “accompany” them in their “cultural development.” This is the heresy of humanitarianism, the “cult of man” condemned by St. Pius X in Pascendi Dominici Gregis and Lamentabili Sane Exitu (prop. 58, 59, 65).
The Heresy of Religious Indifferentism Disguised as “Spiritualities”
El Kassis speaks of the right of indigenous peoples to “maintain and strengthen their distinct… spiritualities, free from discrimination.” The use of the plural “spiritualities” is a deliberate, formal profession of indifferentism and latitudinarianism, condemned by Pius IX (Syllabus, errors 15, 16, 17, 18) and Gregory XVI (Mirari Vos). It implies that the “spirituality” of pagan animism, shamanism, or nature worship stands on equal footing with the one, true, supernatural life of grace found only in the Catholic Church.
The Syllabus condemns the proposition: “Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation” (Error 16). By validating “spiritualities” as distinct from the una fides, the conciliar envoy confirms that the neo-church has abandoned the mandatum divinum: “Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you” (Matt. 28:19-20). The “wisdom in living in harmony with creation” attributed to indigenous peoples is a pantheistic deception, echoing the condemned proposition: “God is identical with the nature of things… all things are God” (Syllabus, Error 1).
“Self-Determination” vs. The Social Kingship of Christ
The core of the UN Declaration celebrated by the “Archbishop” is the “right to self-determination”—“they can freely determine their political status and pursue their economic, social, and cultural development”. This principle is the very essence of the Revolution: sovereignty resides in the people (or the tribe), not in God. It is the political application of the condemned proposition: “The State, as being the origin and source of all rights, is endowed with a certain right not circumscribed by any limits” (Syllabus, Error 39), applied here to the “tribe” or “people.”
Catholic doctrine teaches potestas a Deo (Rom. 13:1). Christ the King, as Pius XI solemnly affirms, “received from the Father unlimited right over all that is created, so that all is subject to His will” (Quas Primas). The “political status” of any nation or tribe must be determined by its conformity to the Law of God, not by an autonomous “free determination.” The “requirement that States consult indigenous peoples… to obtain their informed consent” elevates human consent above the Divine Law. It is the non serviam of the political order, enshrined in international law and blessed by the counterfeit hierarchy.
The Antipope’s Voice: Authority of the Abomination of Desolation
The “Archbishop” invokes “Pope Leo XIV’s exhortation that indigenous peoples ‘must present their own human, cultural, and Christian wealth, courageously and freely’ in ‘the assembly of nations.'” This citation of Robert Prevost—the manifest heretic who, by the very fact of his public adhesion to the conciliar apostasy (religious liberty, ecumenism, collegiality, new mass), has ipso facto lost all jurisdiction (Canon 188 §4; Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice; Cum ex Apostolatus Officio)—as a source of moral authority is the ultimate proof of the sect’s separation from the Catholic Church.
As the Defense of Sedevacantism documentation demonstrates, “A manifest heretic cannot be Pope… a non-Christian in no way can be Pope… he cannot be the head of something of which he is not a member” (Bellarmine). To quote the antipope as a guide for the “International Community” is to quote a usurper sitting in the seat of Peter, in loco Dei, preaching the doctrines of the Antichrist. The “assembly of nations” is not the Civitas Dei; it is the Masonic parody of it. The true Church does not ask the UN for permission to exist; she commands the UN to kneel before Christ the King.
Silence on the Supernatural: The Gravest Accusation
The most damning aspect of the intervention is its total silence. There is no mention of:
– The Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass (the Unbloody Sacrifice of Calvary) as the sole acceptable worship of God.
– The necessity of the Catholic Faith and the Sacrament of Baptism for salvation.
– The Social Kingship of Christ over all temporal powers.
– The condemnation of Freemasonry as the synagogue of Satan driving the UN agenda.
– The Final Judgment and the eternal destiny of souls.
This silence is not an oversight; it is the modus operandi of the Church of the New Advent. As Pius XI warns, “the more the sweetest Name of our Redeemer is omitted with unworthy silence in international gatherings and parliaments, the more loudly it must be confessed” (Quas Primas). The “Archbishop” confesses not Christ, but the “Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.” He serves not the Regnum Christi, but the Regnum Hominis.
The faithful remnant, adhering to the immutable Tradition and the valid Sacraments preserved by true bishops and priests outside the conciliar structures, recognize this intervention for what it is: a further step in the operation of error (2 Thess. 2:10-11), preparing the world for the reign of the Antichrist by acclimating them to a “Church” that has nothing left of Christ but the name.
Source:
Holy See defends rights of indigenous peoples at UN (vaticannews.va)
Date: 08.10.2026