EWTN News portal reports that scholars of the so-called “Religious Liberty Clinic” at the University of Notre Dame have filed an amicus brief urging the United States Supreme Court to strike down a Texas statute mandating the display of the Decalogue in public school classrooms. The Texas law, signed by Governor Greg Abbott in June 2025, requires a “durable poster or framed copy of the Ten Commandments” in every elementary and secondary classroom. A federal district judge initially blocked the law, but the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld it. The Notre Dame brief argues the law “forces state-sponsored religious instruction on children” and violates the Establishment Clause. This action by a nominally Catholic institution, appealing to the Masonic judiciary of a secular state to remove the Law of God from the sight of children, is the quintessential manifestation of the conciliar church’s apostasy: it confirms that the “religious liberty” heresy condemned by Pius IX and St. Pius X has become the operating principle of the neo-church, which now functions as the most effective agent of laïcité and the abomination of desolation in the public square.
The Conciliar Church as Accomplice to the Secularist Usurpation of God’s Rights
The spectacle of a “Catholic” university law clinic petitioning the Supreme Court of a Masonic republic to banish the Ten Commandments from schools is not a mere legal disagreement; it is a formal act of rebellion against the Social Kingship of Christ. Pope Pius XI, in Quas Primas, teaches with unshakeable authority: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed, because the main reason why some have the right to command and others have the duty to obey was removed.” The Notre Dame scholars, by invoking the “Establishment Clause” to expel the Decalogue, are not defending the Church’s freedom; they are ratifying the total separation of the State from God—a proposition explicitly condemned in the Syllabus of Errors (Error 55: “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church”). They have adopted the vocabulary of the enemy: “state-sponsored religious instruction,” “coercion,” “government-approved religious truth.” This is the language of the French Revolution, of laïcité, of the Masonic lodge, not the language of the Catholic Magisterium.
The Heresy of “Religious Liberty” as the Operating System of the Neo-Church
The very name of the clinic—”Lindsay & Matt Moroun Religious Liberty Clinic”—is a badge of infidelity. The concept of “religious liberty” as a natural right of man to choose his religion or to be free from the public influence of the true Religion was anathematized by Pope Pius IX (Syllabus, Errors 15, 16, 17, 77, 78, 79) and Pope Leo XIII (Libertas Praestantissimum). Error 77 of the Syllabus condemns the proposition: “In the present day it is no longer expedient that the Catholic religion should be held as the only religion of the State, to the exclusion of all other forms of worship.” Error 79 condemns the idea that “the civil liberty of every form of worship… conduce more easily to corrupt the morals and minds of the people, and to propagate the pest of indifferentism” is false. The Notre Dame brief operates entirely within this condemned framework. It accepts the Masonic premise that the State is religiously neutral, that the First Amendment erects a “wall of separation” between God and Caesar, and that the public acknowledgment of the Decalogue constitutes an “establishment” of religion. By doing so, these scholars place the U.S. Constitution above the Law of God, rendering to Caesar what belongs to God (Matt. 22:21). This is the synthesis of all heresies—Modernism—identified by St. Pius X in Lamentabili Sane Exitu and Pascendi Dominici Gregis: the subordination of the supernatural to the natural, of the Church to the world, of dogma to history, of truth to “consensus.”
The Decalogue: Not “Religious Instruction” but the Foundation of All Just Law
The brief’s central lie is the characterization of the Ten Commandments as “sectarian religious instruction” or “government-approved religious truth.” This is a blasphemous reduction. The Decalogue is the lex naturalis inscribed by the Finger of God (Ex. 31:18), the immutable moral foundation of every legitimate civil order. St. Thomas Aquinas teaches that human law derives its binding force solely from its conformity to the eternal and natural law (ST I-II, q. 95, a. 2). To display the Commandments in a courtroom or classroom is not to “establish a religion” in the Protestant sectarian sense; it is to acknowledge the source of all justice. Pius XI declares: “His reign encompasses also all non-Christians, so that most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ… And it matters not whether individuals, families, or states, for men united in societies are no less subject to the authority of Christ than individuals.” The Texas law, however imperfect its motivation or execution by a Protestant governor, at least renders a minimal, external homage to this truth. The Notre Dame brief seeks to strip even this homage away, leaving the State nakedly autonomous, the very definition of the Civitas Diaboli.
The Juridical Farce: Appealing to the “Supreme Court” as Supreme Arbiter of Truth
The filing begs the Supreme Court for “urgently needed guidance” on the Establishment Clause. This reveals the idolatrous heart of the conciliar mentality: the U.S. Supreme Court is treated as the de facto magisterium of the new civil religion. The scholars cite Stone v. Graham (1980) and McCreary County v. ACLU (2005) as binding precedent, effectively treating the rulings of a Masonic judiciary—itself illegitimate because it derives authority from “We the People” rather than God—as superior to the Divine Positive Law. They argue the Fifth Circuit “misstates the history underpinning the First Amendment.” But the First Amendment itself, in its prohibition of an “establishment of religion,” is a Masonic construct designed to privatize the Catholic Church and dethrone Christ the King. As Leo XIII warned in Immortale Dei: “The State… cannot have the Church as its end… but it is bound to protect the Church.” The American experiment, from its inception, refused this duty. The Notre Dame scholars, far from critiquing this fatal flaw, have become its most zealous defenders.
The Silence on the Supernatural: The Gravest Accusation
Nowhere in the article, nor in the brief it summarizes, is there a whisper of the salus animarum, the eternal destiny of the children, the reality of Original Sin, the necessity of Grace, or the Final Judgment. The argument is purely procedural, bureaucratic, naturalistic: “precedent,” “coercion,” “standing,” “guidance.” This silence is the signature of the Antichurch. A true Catholic lawyer, faced with a law displaying God’s Commandments, would argue not for its removal but for its enforcement—for the State to penalize blasphemy, to protect the Sabbath, to honor the Name of God. Instead, these “scholars” use the machinery of the secular state to sanitize the public square of God’s Law, ensuring that the next generation is formed in a vacuum of transcendence, easy prey for the “triple concupiscence” Pius XI warns about. They have fulfilled the prophecy of Quas Primas: “many of them do not hold the position in so-called social life, nor do they have the significance that those who carry the torch of truth should have. This unfavorable situation may perhaps be attributed to the laziness and timidity of the good… as a result of which the enemies of the Church act with greater audacity and hardness.”
Notre Dame: A Fortress of the Counter-Church
The University of Notre Dame, long since surrendered to the novus ordo revolution, functions here as a paramasonic structure par excellence. Its “Religious Liberty Clinic” does not defend the Libertas Ecclesiae (the freedom of the Church to teach, govern, and sanctify without state interference, as demanded by Pius XI in Quas Primas); it defends the “liberty” of the secular state from God. This is the exact inversion of the Catholic social order. The scholars involved are not “Catholic” in any meaningful sense; they are functionaries of the Church of the New Advent, trained in the hermeneutic of rupture, formed by the Spirit of Vatican II, which is the spirit of the world. Their brief is a theological suicide note, signed in the blood of the souls they were ordained to protect.
Conclusion: The Only Remedy is the Restoration of the Kingship of Christ
The Texas law will stand or fall by the votes of nine unelected lawyers in black robes. But the real crisis is not legal; it is theological. The Notre Dame brief proves that the conciliar sect has fully internalized the Masonic dogma of the separation of Church and State. It will not be “religious liberty” arguments that save the West, but the integral confession of Christ the King over every legislature, every courtroom, every classroom, and every human heart. “Peace is only possible in the kingdom of Christ” (Pius XI, Quas Primas). Until the false “pope” Leo XIV and his curia of Modernists are rejected, and the true hierarchy of the Church—bishops with valid orders and jurisdiction, adhering to the immutable Faith—publicly condemns this idolatry of the State and demands the restoration of the Corpus Christianum, every such “victory” for secularism, cheered on by the neo-church, is another nail in the coffin of Christian civilization. The Ten Commandments belong on the walls of every school because they belong in the conscience of every legislator and every judge. Non possumus.
Source:
Notre Dame religious liberty scholars urge Supreme Court to strike down Texas Ten Commandments law (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 08.10.2026