The EWTN News portal reports on a series of events framed as “pro-life victories”: U.S. Senator Josh Hawley demands the FDA account for incomplete data in a mifepristone safety study; the “Diocese of Boise” donates $300,000 alongside the Mormon sect (LDS) to oppose an Idaho ballot measure expanding abortion; a teacher in England sues for discrimination after being fired for expressing pro-life views; and “pro-abortion” protesters blockade a student pro-life stall at the University of Manchester. This catalog of naturalistic political maneuvering and interreligious collaboration exposes the utter bankruptcy of the conciliar sect’s strategy: it has abandoned the social reign of Christ the King for the fleeting illusion of influence within the Masonic order of secular democracy.
The Conciliar Sect’s Reliance on Secular Power Instead of Christ the King
The entire narrative presented by the EWTN portal rests on the implicit assumption that the remedy for the slaughter of the innocents lies in petitions to regulatory agencies, litigation in secular courts, and the mobilization of voting blocs. Senator Hawley’s letter to the FDA Acting Commissioner begs the very institution that legalized the chemical dismemberment of children by mail to “review all relevant data.” This is the politics of supplicatio ad tyrannos (supplication to tyrants), a stark violation of the divine mandate that “the State must leave… freedom to the members of Orders and Congregations… who contribute most to the expansion and establishment of Christ’s Kingdom” (Pius XI, Quas Primas).
Pius XI teaches authoritatively: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed” (Quas Primas, citing Ubi Arcano). The conciliar “bishops” and their lay collaborators operate entirely within this godless framework. They do not call down the thunder of anathema sit upon the legislators and judges who sanction infanticide; they file amicus briefs and donate to Political Action Committees. The article notes the “Bishop” Christensen urging Catholics to vote because “The voting booth does not somehow stand outside our relationship with Christ.” This is a pernicious lie. In the religion of the Civitas Dei, the voting booth is precisely where the faithful are tempted to render to Caesar what belongs to God: the sovereign right to define justice and protect life. The Syllabus of Errors condemns the proposition that “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church” (Error 55), yet the conciliar sect practices this separation religiously, reducing the Bride of Christ to a lobbyist for “religious freedom” within the Civitas Terrena.
Ecumenical Betrayal: Collaboration with the Mormon Sect
The most scandalous element of the report is the explicit admission that the “Diocese of Boise” joined the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints—a polytheistic, non-Christian cult denying the Trinity, the Divinity of Christ, and the unity of the Church—in a common political action committee (“Too Extreme for Idaho”). The “Bishop” Peter F. Christensen boasts of this coalition as a moral imperative.
This is the bitter fruit of the heresy of indifferentism, condemned by Pope Pius IX in the Syllabus (Error 16: “Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation”) and by Pope Gregory XVI in Mirari Vos. The Syllabus further anathematizes the idea that “Protestantism is nothing more than another form of the same true Christian religion” (Error 18); Mormonism is not even Protestantism, but a gnostic fabrication. By aligning the “Catholic” name with this sect, the conciliar hierarchy commits a sin against the First Commandment and the munus docendi. They proclaim by action that the social reign of Christ is negotiable, that the unica salus can be set aside for a temporary political majority. As Pius XI warns in Quas Primas: “The state is happy not by one means, and man by another; for the state is nothing else than a harmonious association of men”—an association that must be ordered to the King of Kings, not to a false prophet of Palmyra.
The Illusion of “Religious Liberty” and the Equality Act
The case of the teacher Anita Meston in England, suing under the Equality Act 2010 for “discrimination against her Christian faith,” illustrates the trap of libertas ecclesiastica as defined by the Modernist state. She appeals to a “protected characteristic” granted by the very secular power that mandates the abortion regime. The Syllabus condemns the error that “The civil government… has a right to an indirect negative power over religious affairs” (Error 41) and that “In the case of conflicting laws enacted by the two powers, the civil law prevails” (Error 42).
Meston’s defense—“In a free and just society, teachers should not be fired for honestly expressing their deeply held beliefs”—accepts the Masonic premise that truth is a private “belief” to be tolerated in a marketplace of ideas, rather than the objective reality to which the state must bend the knee. The conciliar sect’s defense of “religious liberty” (Vatican II’s Dignitatis Humanae) has disarmed the faithful. They now beg for crumbs from the table of the Synagogue of Satan (Pius IX, Quanta Cura), instead of demanding the public confession of Christ the King by the magistrate. The protesters at Manchester University blocking the pro-life stall—“Destroy Pro-Life Soc”—are simply the consistent enforcers of the secularist dogma that “The teaching of the Catholic Church is hostile to the well-being and interests of society” (Syllabus, Error 40). The conciliar “pro-life” movement has no answer to this because it has accepted the battlefield of the enemy: neutrality.
Silence on the Supernatural Order: No Call to Penance, Conversion, or the Social Reign of Christ
Read the EWTN report again. There is not a single mention of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, the Rosary, public penance, the conversion of sinners, or the Kingship of Christ. The “Bishop” Christensen speaks of “matters of profound moral significance” but frames them entirely in the language of “human dignity,” “freedom,” and “protection owed to unborn human life”—the vernacular of the United Nations, not the Depositum Fidei.
This silence is the gravissima accusatio. St. Pius X in Lamentabili Sane Exitu condemns the Modernist error that “The dogmas of faith should be understood according to their practical function, i.e., as binding in action, rather than as principles of belief” (Prop. 26). The conciliar operatives have inverted this: they treat the dogma “Thou shalt not kill” as a mere “practical function” for political activism, stripped of its theological root in the Creator’s absolute dominion. The False Fatima analysis
Source:
Sen. Hawley asks FDA to address concerns over incomplete data in abortion drug safety study (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 14.10.2026