The Vatican News portal (21 October 2026) reports the address of Monsignor Juan Antonio Cruz Serrano, Permanent Observer of the conciliar sect to the Organization of American States (OAS), at an extraordinary session dedicated to “The Encounter of Two Worlds.” The speaker deployed the standard modernist lexicon—”lights and shadows,” “dialogue,” “encounter,” “diversity as a resource”—citing the usurper “Pope” Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) and a fabricated encyclical Magnifica humanitas, while presenting Our Lady of Guadalupe as a symbol of syncretic unity rather than the conversion of the Americas to the one true Faith. This discourse is a manifest exercise in naturalistic modernism, substituting the Social Kingship of Christ for Masonic dialogue and the salvation of souls for the “dignity” of the natural man.
The Usurper’s Voice: Citing a Non-Existent Encyclical of an Antipope
The address explicitly invokes “Pope Leo XIV”—Robert Prevost, the current occupant of the Vatican structures since the death of the apostate Bergoglio—and attributes to him an encyclical titled Magnifica humanitas. From the perspective of integral Catholic theology, this citation is a double nullity. First, the See of Peter has been vacant since the death of Pius XII in 1958; the line of claimants beginning with John XXIII are antipopes, usurpers of the Petrine See, devoid of jurisdiction and magisterial authority. As St. Robert Bellarmine teaches, “A manifest heretic cannot be Pope… he ceases to be Pope and head, just as he ceases to be a Christian and member of the body of the Church” (De Romano Pontifice, Lib. 2, Cap. 30). Second, no such encyclical exists in the treasury of the Church’s authentic Magisterium; it is a fabrication of the conciliar sect, a document of the neo-church designed to baptize the errors of the Second Vatican Council—religious liberty, false ecumenism, and the cult of man. To cite this phantom text as authoritative is to build on sand, “domus super petram non aedificata” (a house not built upon the rock).
The “Lights and Shadows” Heresy: Relativizing the Spiritual Conquest
The speaker’s central metaphor—“lights and shadows” regarding the arrival of Europeans in the Americas—is a theological poison. It places the supernatural work of grace, the planting of the Cross, and the baptism of millions on the same moral plane as the temporal sins of individuals. This is the hermeneutic of rupture applied to history: it judges the past by the standards of the secular present, denying the primacy of the spiritual order. Pius XI, in Quas Primas, thundered that “the hope of lasting peace will not yet shine upon nations as long as individuals and states renounce and do not wish to recognize the reign of our Savior.” The “encounter” was not a dialogue of equals; it was the Conquista of souls for Christ the King. To speak of “mutual enrichment” is to deny the necessitas medii of the Church for salvation (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus). The Syllabus of Pius IX condemns the proposition that “Protestantism is nothing more than another form of the same true Christian religion” (Error 18); by parity of reason, the indigenous religions were not “ways of perceiving the world” to be “appreciated,” but idolatries to be destroyed ad majorem Dei gloriam.
Our Lady of Guadalupe Instrumentalized for Syncretism
The most egregious abuse is the instrumentalization of Our Lady of Guadalupe. The speaker declares: “The greatest symbol of this encounter is found in Our Lady of Guadalupe… Her image remains a source of unity and encounter.” This is a deliberate perversion. The Guadalupe event (1531) was the conquest of the Aztec empire by the Virgin, the destruction of the demonic cult of human sacrifice, and the mass conversion of millions to the Catholic Faith through the waters of Baptism. It was not a “meeting of two worlds” in the modernist sense of inculturation or religious relativism. The Nican Mopohua recounts the Virgin’s command to build a teocalli (a temple) where she would show her love—as Mother of the true God. To strip this apparition of its exclusive Christological and ecclesiological finality, making it a patroness of “dialogue” and “diversity,” is to commit the sin of the Golden Calf: fashioning an idol of the Mother of God to serve the religion of humanity. The coming 500th anniversary (2031) is being prepared by the paramasonic structures occupying the Vatican as a festival of syncretism, not a call to conversion.
The OAS: A Masonic Forum Legitimized by the Conciliar Sect
The venue—the Organization of American States (OAS)—is a creature of the Masonic international order, founded on the principles of the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man (1948), a document steeped in the naturalism condemned by Leo XIII in Testem Benevolentiae and by St. Pius X in Notre Charge Apostolique. The Syllabus of Pius IX condemns the proposition: “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church” (Error 55). By sending a “Permanent Observer” to this body, the neo-church formally recognizes the legitimacy of the secularist, liberal order and participates in the construction of the Civitas Dei without God. The “Holy See at OAS” is not the voice of the Church; it is the voice of the abomination of desolation speaking the language of the City of Man.
Missionaries Distorted: From Conquistadors for Souls to NGOs for “Dignity”
The address cites St. Peter Claver, Bartolomé de las Casas, and Francisco de Vitoria as “exemplary missionaries” who protected “the dignity of every person.” This is a historical falsification serving a modernist agenda. These saints labored for the salus animarum, the salvation of souls through Baptism and the sacraments, not for the abstract, naturalistic “human dignity” of the UN Declaration. Las Casas fought against the encomienda system because it impeded the evangelization and eternal salvation of the Indians, not because it violated “human rights.” Vitoria’s Relectio de Indis established the ius gentium rooted in natural law sub ratione entis, ultimately ordered to the supernatural end. To parade them as precursors of the OAS “human rights” paradigm is identity theft of the saints. The true missionary does not “recognize the dignity of the other”; he baptizes the other in nomine Patris et Filii et Spiritus Sancti, snatching him from the power of darkness into the Kingdom of Christ (Col 1:13).
Theological Vacuum: Silence on Baptism, Kingship of Christ, and Eternal Damnation
The gravest accusation is the total silence on the supernatural order. Not a word on the necessity of Baptism for salvation (John 3:5), the Social Kingship of Christ over all nations (Quas Primas), the reality of Hell for those who die in original sin or mortal sin, or the duty of the State to profess the Catholic Faith (Immortale Dei, Leo XIII). The speech is pure naturalism: “technological advancements,” “interconnected world,” “justice and fraternity,” “protect those most in need.” This is the Gospel according to Freemasonry, the religion of humanity prophesied by the Syllabus (Error 58: “No other forces are to be recognized except those which reside in matter…”). The “encyclical” Magnifica humanitas—“Magnificent Humanity”—reveals the true deity of the conciliar sect: Man. “Homo homini deus factus est” (Man has become a god to man), the ultimate blasphemy of the Antichrist.
Conclusion: This OAS address is not a pastoral act; it is a political manifesto of the counter-church. It confirms that the structures in Rome are the primary engine of the apostasia generalis, dissolving the Kingdom of Christ into the “fraternity” of the Masonic Republic. The faithful must flee this synagogue of Satan (Apoc 2:9), cleave to the Tradition of the Fathers and the Mass of All Time, and pray for the restoration of the true Hierarchy, “ut revertatur honor Domini nostri Iesu Christi”.
Source:
Holy See at OAS: Respect the dignity and culture of indigenous peoples (vaticannews.va)
Date: 21.10.2026