Conciliar Theology’s Surrender to Modernism Exposed


Conciliar Theology’s Surrender to Modernism Exposed

The Vatican News portal (November 26, 2025) reports on an address by usurper “Pope” Leo XIV to the International Theological Commission, praising their work commemorating the 1,700th anniversary of the Council of Nicaea and urging theologians to engage with “all other sciences” to address “challenges” facing the “Church” and humanity. The text promotes interdisciplinary dialogue, cultural adaptation of doctrine, and cites suspect figures like “St.” John Henry Newman. The address culminates in a call for theologians to resolve challenges through “well-rounded study,” abandoning the scientia fidei (science of faith) as the supreme arbiter of truth.


Illegitimate Structures Masquerading as Catholic Authority

The International Theological Commission—established in 1969 by the apostate Montini (“Paul VI”)—embodies the conciliar revolution’s rejection of depositum fidei (the deposit of faith). As Pius IX solemnly declared: “The Church, conceived in splendid truth, tolerates no contrariety of error” (Syllabus of Errors, 1864, Condemned Proposition 14). Yet the Commission operates under the modernist premise that dogma evolves through “cultural experiences,” directly contradicting the infallible condemnation of doctrinal development in Pius X’s Pascendi Dominici Gregis: “Modernists… lay down that religious dogmas… must be subject to evolution” (1907).

Theological Relativism Disguised as “Creative Fidelity”

Leo XIV’s call for “creative fidelity” exposes the conciliar sect’s commitment to heresy. True fidelity admits no creativity, only custodia veritatis (guardianship of truth). Pius XII warned in Humani Generis (1950) that novel theological methods risk “dogmatic relativism”. The usurper’s praise for theologians who adapt doctrine to “people of all cultures” echoes the condemned proposition in Lamentabili Sane (1907): “Truth changes with man, because it develops with him” (Proposition 58). By urging theologians to explore “all science,” Leo XIV subordinates revelation to human reason—precisely what Pius IX anathematized: “Human reason… suffices… to secure the welfare of men and nations” (Syllabus, Proposition 3).

Canonization of Heretics and the Subversion of Tradition

The invocation of Newman—a “saint” manufactured by Bergoglio—reveals the depth of apostasy. Newman’s theory of doctrinal development was condemned as “the synthesis of all heresies” (Pascendi). Similarly, the inclusion of Thérèse of Lisieux (canonized 1925) alongside Newman constitutes a deliberate blurring of boundaries between authentic mysticism and modernist corruption. Even St. Thomas Aquinas is weaponized against his own teachings: his Summa Theologica (I, Q.1, Art.8) insists theology is the “highest wisdom” to which all sciences must submit—not an equal partner in dialogue.

“Through a well-rounded study, you are therefore called to offer your precious contribution to the discernment and resolution of the challenges that confront both the Church and humanity as a whole.”

This statement reduces theology to social engineering. Contrast this with Pius XI’s encyclical Quas Primas (1925): “The empire of our Redeemer embraces all men… The right of the Church to teach mankind… is a right which the Church can never renounce”. The conciliar sect has inverted this hierarchy, making theology serve worldly ends.

The Omission of Christ’s Kingship and the Silence on Apostasy

Nowhere does Leo XIV mention Christ’s Social Kingship—the very foundation of Catholic society. The Council of Nicaea, whose anniversary they feign to honor, proclaimed Christ “God from God… whose kingdom shall have no end”. Yet the conciliar commission suppresses this truth, instead promoting a horizontal “dialogue” that denies Regnum Christi. This silence confirms the analysis in False Fatima Apparitions: “The message focuses on external threats… omitting the main danger: modernist apostasy within the Church”. The true Church warns of eternal judgment; the conciliar sect offers sociological therapy.

Conclusion: A Pseudo-Theology for a Pseudo-Church

The International Theological Commission functions as the heresy laboratory of the conciliar sect. Its “authoritative texts” are not authoritative but apostate. As St. Pius X decreed in Lamentabili: “Ecclesiastical judgments… prove that the faith of the Church is contrary to history” (Proposition 3). Until the restoration of legitimate authority under Christ the King, the faithful must reject these structures and cling to semper idem (always the same) doctrine—untainted by the “changing course of history” heresy.


Source:
Pope Leo: Theology must explore all aspects of human science
  (vaticannews.va)
Date: 26.11.2025

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top
Antichurch.org
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.