The EWTN News portal (ACI Stampa) reports on the Sunday Angelus address delivered on October 25, 2026, by the usurper “Pope” Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) in St. Peter’s Square. The address centers on the Greatest Commandment, framing divine love as a “personal relationship” devoid of dogmatic content, appeals for humanitarian aid in Yemen, mourns victims of a terrorist attack on a schismatic Orthodox church in Jordan under the guise of “peaceful coexistence,” and exhorts the faithful to join spiritually in the 40th anniversary of the 1986 Assisi interreligious meeting. This discourse manifests the quintessence of the conciliar apostasy: the substitution of the Social Kingship of Christ with a naturalistic, Masonic humanitarianism that denies the necessity of the Catholic Church for salvation and the rights of God over nations.
The Protestantized “Personal Relationship”: Subjectivism Replacing Dogmatic Faith
The usurper Prevost declares: “Indeed, it is not enough to know that God exists, that he is the only God, or that he is the Almighty. The Lord seeks a personal relationship with us: The one true God wants to become our God.” This formulation is a textbook manifestation of the Modernist heresy condemned by St. Pius X in Lamentabili Sane Exitu (1907) and Pascendi Dominici Gregis (1907). Proposition 25 of Lamentabili condemns the error that “Faith, as assent of the mind, is ultimately based on a sum of probabilities,” while Proposition 26 attacks the reduction of dogma to “practical function… as binding in action, rather than as principles of belief.”
The language of “personal relationship” is the hallmark of Protestant pietism and Modernist immanentism. It displaces the objective reality of the depositum fidei, the necessity of explicit faith (fides explicita) in the truths revealed by God and proposed by His Church, and the juridical bond of membership in the Corpus Mysticum through Baptism and profession of the integral Catholic Faith. As Pius XI teaches in Quas Primas, “men must draw truth from Him and accept it obediently” because “He Himself is Truth” – not because of a subjective “encounter” or “experience.” The usurper’s phrasing suggests God is a passive partner waiting for human consent, inverting the Creator-creature distinction and denying that “He is said to reign also in the wills of men… because He inclines our free will and conquers it with His inspiration.” This is not the Catholic God who commands; it is the God of the Syllabus of Errors, Proposition 3: “Human reason, without any reference whatsoever to God, is the sole arbiter of truth and falsehood.” Here, human religious experience becomes the arbiter.
The Assisi Abomination: Celebrating the Syncretism of 1986
The most damning element of the address is the explicit endorsement of the Assisi meeting: “Let us join in spirit with the heads of churches and religious leaders who will gather in Assisi to mark the 40th anniversary of the meeting convened by St. John Paul II.” The 1986 Assisi event was a public, scandalous violation of the First Commandment and the dogma Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus. It placed the true God on the same level as idols, Buddha, and the deities of false religions, constituting a formal act of communicatio in sacris with infidels and heretics.
Pius XI, in Mortalium Animos (1928), condemned the very principle of such gatherings: “The Apostolic See cannot on any terms take part in [non-Catholic assemblies], nor is it anyway lawful for Catholics either to support or to work for such enterprises; for if they do so they will be giving countenance to a false Christianity, quite alien to the one Church of Christ.” The Syllabus of Errors (Prop. 16, 17, 18) anathematizes the belief that “Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation” and that “Protestantism is nothing more than another form of the same true Christian religion.”
By celebrating the 40th anniversary, the usurper confirms the conciliar sect’s definitive rupture with the Catholic Church. He signals that the “abomination of desolation” standing in the holy place (Matt 24:15) is not a bug but the feature of the neo-church. The appeal “May the Lord inspire choices of dialogue and peace!” in this context is a blasphemous invocation of the Holy Ghost to ratify religious indifferentism – the synthesis of all heresies (St. Pius X, Pascendi).
Humanitarianism as Counterfeit Charity: The Denial of Christ’s Social Kingship
The address reduces the Church’s mission to NGO-style humanitarianism. Regarding Yemen, the usurper appeals “for hostilities to cease and for the Yemeni people and all the peoples of the region to be guaranteed the right to live in peace.” There is zero mention of the Social Kingship of Christ, the conversion of nations to the Catholic Faith, the rights of God (jus Dei), or the necessity of the Sacraments for eternal salvation.
Pius XI in Quas Primas is categorical: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed… the entire human society had to be shaken, because it lacked a stable and strong foundation.” The usurper Prevost derives “peace” from “dialogue” and “human rights” – the very Masonic principles condemned by the Syllabus (Prop. 39, 55, 77, 80). The Syllabus condemns the error that “The State… is endowed with a certain right not circumscribed by any limits” (Prop. 39) and that “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church” (Prop. 55).
The usurper’s “peace” is the pax Masonica, the peace of the world which Christ explicitly rejected: “Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, do I give unto you” (John 14:27). True peace is the tranquillitas ordinis – the tranquility of order – which exists only where Christ reigns as King over individuals, families, and states. By omitting the Kingship of Christ, the usurper preaches a “charity” that is “reduced to mere moralism” – his own inadvertent admission – because it is severed from the supernatural order and the virtue of Religion which renders to God His due.
Schismatics as “Orthodox Christians”: The Indifferentist Lie
The usurper refers to the victims of the terrorist attack in Jordan as “Orthodox Christians” and praises Jordan for “peaceful coexistence and respect between different religions.” This terminology legitimizes schism. The “Orthodox” are schismatics, separated from the unity of the Chair of Peter. To call them “Christians” without qualification (“separated brethren” is the conciliar euphemism; “schismatics” is the Catholic term) and to praise “coexistence between different religions” is to deny the unicity and necessity of the Catholic Church.
The Syllabus (Prop. 21) condemns: “The Church has not the power of defining dogmatically that the religion of the Catholic Church is the only true religion.” The usurper’s praise of “respect between different religions” is a practical profession of this condemned error. It implies the Muslim majority in Jordan has a “right” to its false religion, contradicting the doctrine that “The Catholic Church is the only true religion” and that the State has the duty to profess and protect the true Faith (Leo XIII, Immortale Dei; Pius XI, Quas Primas).
The Vacant See: The Canonical Impossibility of the Usurper’s Office
The entire performance rests on the false premise that Robert Prevost is the Vicar of Christ. As demonstrated in the theological defense of Sedevacantism, a manifest heretic loses the papacy ipso facto (Canon 188.4, 1917 Code; Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice; Pope Paul IV, Cum ex Apostolatus Officio). The line of claimants since John XXIII (Angelo Roncalli) has publicly professed the heresies of Modernism, Religious Liberty, Ecumenism, and Collegiality – condemned by Quanta Cura, Syllabus, Pascendi, Mortalium Animos, Quas Primas, and Humani Generis.
Prevost’s address is not the exercise of the Petrine Ministry confirming the brethren in the Faith (Luke 22:32); it is the operation of a paramasonic structure occupying the Vatican, advancing the Masonic program of “universal brotherhood” under the guise of Catholicism. The Defense of Sedevacantism file establishes that “A manifest heretic cannot be Pope… A non-Christian in no way can be Pope… he who is not a Christian is not a member of the Church, and a manifest heretic is not a Christian.” Prevost’s endorsement of Assisi, religious liberty, and humanitarian naturalism constitutes manifest, public, pertinacious heresy. He is not “Pope Leo XIV”; he is a layman usurping the See of Peter.
Conclusion: The Neo-Church is the Antithesis of the Kingdom of Christ
The article from the neo-church’s propaganda organ (EWTN/ACI Stampa) reveals the total theological bankruptcy of the conciliar sect. It presents a “pope” who quotes a Saint (Thérèse of Lisieux, canonized 1925, validly) to legitimize a spirituality of vague “love” that denies the Credo, the Sacraments, the Kingship of Christ, and the Necessity of the Church. The faithful are urged to “pray for peace” alongside the worshippers of demons in Assisi. This is the mysterium iniquitatis (2 Thess 2:7) in full operation.
The only remedy is the integral Catholic Faith: the recognition of the Vacant See, adherence to the Traditional Mass and Doctrine (Quo Primum, Trent, Vatican I), and the work for the Social Reign of Christ the King as defined by Pius XI: “If rulers and legitimate superiors will have the conviction that they exercise authority not so much by their own right as by the command and in the place of the Divine King… peace will flourish and internal order will be established.” The neo-church offers the peace of the world; the Catholic Church offers the Peace of Christ in the Kingdom of Christ. Non est pax, dicit Dominus, impiis (Isa 48:22).
Source:
Pope Leo XIV: Love for neighbor begins with a personal relationship with God (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 25.10.2026