The Vatican News portal reports on the October 23, 2026, attack on the Greek Orthodox Church of Saint George in Hammoud, Jordan, where nine people were killed during a funeral. The article, authored by “Father” Rifat Bader, director of the Catholic Center for Studies and Media in Jordan, frames the subsequent “wave of solidarity between Muslims and Christians” as a triumph of “dialogue and coexistence.” “Pope” Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) is cited praising Jordan as a model of “coexistence and respect for religions.” King Abdullah II, the Grand Imam of Al-Azhar, and various “interfaith” initiatives (Amman Message, A Common Word, World Interfaith Harmony Week) are paraded as evidence of Jordan’s role as a “homeland of dialogue.” The piece concludes with “Fr.” Bader praying to the “new martyrs” for intercession that “love remains stronger than hatred.” This spectacle of naturalistic humanitarianism, masquerading as Catholic witness, exposes the absolute bankruptcy of the conciliar sect’s false ecumenism and its betrayal of the Social Kingship of Christ.
The Antichurch’s Exploitation of Tragedy for False Ecumenism
The cited article is not a Catholic response to persecution; it is a press release for the Masonic religion of “Human Fraternity.” The author, a functionary of the neo-church occupying the Vatican, does not mourn the dead as a son of the Church Militant mourning souls potentially lost outside the Ark of Salvation. He celebrates the “extraordinary display of unity and respect that brought Christians and Muslims together” as the primary fruit of the massacre. This is the fruit of the conciliar revolution: the reduction of the Church’s mission from the salvation of souls through the preaching of the Gospel and the administration of the Sacraments to the promotion of “social cohesion” and “religious diversity” as a “source of richness.”
The Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX condemns the proposition: “Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation, and arrive at eternal salvation” (Error 16). It condemns: “Protestantism is nothing more than another form of the same true Christian religion, in which form it is given to please God equally as in the Catholic Church” (Error 18). The article’s entire narrative is a practical application of these condemned errors. The “solidarity” described is not the unity of the Faith (unitas fidei), but the unity of the world (unitas mundi), forged in the fires of indifferentism. The blood of the victims is used to cement the “cultural and educational” battle against “fundamentalism” — a code word for the exclusive claims of the Catholic Faith.
“Pope” Leo XIV’s Blasphemous Praise of Religious Indifferentism
The antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost), during the Angelus, described Jordan as characterized by “coexistence and respect for religions.” This statement is a formal adhesion to the heresy of religious liberty condemned by Gregory XVI (Mirari Vos), Pius IX (Quanta Cura, Syllabus), Leo XIII (Immortale Dei, Libertas), and St. Pius X (Vehementer Nos). The Syllabus condemns: “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church” (Error 55) and “In the present day it is no longer expedient that the Catholic religion should be held as the only religion of the State, to the exclusion of all other forms of worship” (Error 77).
By praising a Muslim monarchy for “respect for religions,” the usurper on the throne of Peter implicitly endorses the Quranic denial of the Divinity of Christ, the Trinity, and the Redemption. He legitimizes the status quo of a state where the public profession of the Catholic Faith is restricted, where apostasy from Islam is legally impossible, and where the Church does not enjoy the libertas ecclesiastica demanded by the King of Kings. As Pius XI teaches in Quas Primas: “His reign encompasses also all non-Christians, so that most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ.” There is no “coexistence” between the Truth and the father of lies (John 8:44); there is only the conquest of the former over the latter. The antipope’s words are a betrayal of the Royal Rights of Christ the King.
The Heresy of “Human Fraternity” vs. the Social Kingship of Christ
The article’s keywords — “Human Fraternity,” “peace,” “dialogue,” “coexistence” — are the liturgical vocabulary of the Masonic Counter-Church. The “Document on Human Fraternity” signed by Bergoglio in Abu Dhabi (2019), which declared that “the pluralism and the diversity of religions… are willed by God in His wisdom,” is the magna carta of this apostasy. The Jordan article is a local implementation of that global deception.
Pius XI, in Quas Primas, identifies the plague poisoning human society: “the secularism of our times, so-called laicism, its errors and wicked endeavors.” He traces its origin: “It began with the denial of Christ the Lord’s reign over all nations; the Church’s authority to teach men, to issue laws, to govern nations… was denied. And then, slowly, the Christian religion began to be equated with other false religions and shamelessly placed in the same category.” This is precisely the trajectory celebrated in the article. The “Amman Message” (2004), “A Common Word” (2007), and the UN-adopted “World Interfaith Harmony Week” (2010) are the stages of this equating. They construct a civitas terrena without God, where the “common good” is defined by consensus among false religions, not by the lex aeterna revealed in Christ.
The author speaks of “raising generations who understand that religious diversity is not a threat but a source of richness.” This is a direct contradiction of the First Commandment and the dogma Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus. St. Pius X in Lamentabili Sane Exitu condemned the Modernist proposition: “The dogmas of faith should be understood according to their practical function, i.e., as binding in action, rather than as principles of belief” (Error 26). The “Human Fraternity” narrative treats dogmas as mere cultural artifacts useful for social harmony, stripping them of their veritas revelata.
The Amman Message and “A Common Word”: Masonic Bridges to Apostasy
The article boasts of Jordan’s pioneering role in “interfaith dialogue”, citing the Amman Message and “A Common Word” (developed “in collaboration with the Holy See”). These initiatives are not Catholic evangelization; they are theological surrender. The Amman Message seeks to define “true Islam” in opposition to “extremism,” effectively legitimizing Islam as a valid path to God. “A Common Word” bases Muslim-Christian dialogue on the “Two Great Commandments” (Love of God, Love of Neighbor), deliberately omitting the sine qua non of Christian faith: the confession of Jesus Christ as the Incarnate Son of God, the Second Person of the Trinity.
St. John warns: “Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father” (1 John 2:23). Dialogue that brackets this denial is not dialogue; it is treason. The “Holy See” referenced as a collaborator is the post-conciliar counterfeit, which, as the Defense of Sedevacantism file demonstrates, has been occupied by manifest heretics since 1958 who have lost office ipso facto (Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice; Canon 188.4; Cum ex Apostolatus Officio). Their “collaboration” is the collaboration of the synagoga Satanae (Apoc. 2:9) against the Kingdom of Christ.
The False Martyrdom Narrative: Invoking the Dead as Intercessors Outside the Church
The article concludes with “Fr.” Bader praying at the church: “Dear new martyrs, you who prayed last Friday in the church of the martyr Saint George and watered his land with your blood, we ask for your prayers and intercession for us…” This is a triple scandal.
First, it bestows the title of “martyr” on victims of a terrorist attack who were attending a Greek Orthodox (schismatic) funeral. While their deaths are tragic, martyrdom in the strict theological sense requires odium fidei (hatred of the Catholic Faith) on the part of the persecutor and the profession of the Catholic Faith by the victim. To call them “martyrs” indiscriminately empties the term of its meaning and canonizes those outside the visible unity of the Church.
Second, it invokes their intercession. The Church teaches that we may ask the intercession of the Saints canonized by the Church’s infallible authority. To solicit the intercession of unverified, non-Catholic dead is superstition and a violation of the First Commandment. It is the cultus falsus condemned by the Council of Trent (Sess. XXV).
Third, the prayer asks them to intercede “for Jordan, for its Hashemite leadership, for its people, and for all humanity. Help us ensure that love remains stronger than hatred, unity stronger than division.” The telos of this prayer is not the conversion of Jordan to the Catholic Faith, nor the establishment of the Social Kingship of Christ, but the perpetuation of the Masonic “coexistence.” It is a prayer to the dead for the success of the civitas diaboli.
Jordan as “Homeland of Dialogue”: A Modernist Utopia Built on the Ruins of Truth
The article presents Jordan as a “holy land of pilgrimage and a living message of peace and harmony” preparing for the 2000th anniversary of the Baptism of Christ in 2030. This is the ultimate blasphemy: using the mystery of the Baptism of the Lord — which institutes the necessity of baptismus flaminis and baptismus sanguinis for salvation (John 3:5; Council of Trent, Sess. VII, Can. 4) — as a backdrop for a celebration of religious indifferentism.
The “contribution of Christians to building Jordanian society” is praised, while their primary duty — to bear witness to the unica salus in Christ — is silenced. The author explicitly rejects the term “minority” for Christians, preferring a nationalist identity over their supernatural identity as peregrini et viatores (1 Pet 2:11). This is the laicization of the laity condemned by Pius XI: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states… the foundations of that authority were destroyed.”
The Silence on the Necessity of Conversion and the Catholic Faith
The gravest accusation against this article is its total silence on the supernatural order. There is no mention of:
– The necessity of Baptism of Water for salvation.
– The duty of Muslims to convert to the Catholic Faith.
– The reality of Hell for those who die in original sin or mortal sin (including the sin of unbelief/infidelity).
– The Kingship of Christ over the State, requiring the civil law to conform to the Divine Law.
– The Immaculate Sacrifice of the Mass as the only true worship pleasing to God.
– The unique mediation of the Blessed Virgin Mary.
This silence is the modus operandi of the conciliar sect. As the False Fatima Apparitions file notes regarding the Fatima operation: “The message focuses on external threats (communism), omitting the main danger: modernist apostasy within the Church.” Here, the external threat is “terrorism/extremism,” and the proposed remedy is “dialogue/education,” while the internal apostasy of the neo-church — which refuses to preach the Gospel to Muslims — is the true cause of the spiritual desolation.
Conclusion: The Only Solidarity Is in the Unity of the True Faith
The “wave of solidarity” in Jordan is a wave of apostasy. It is the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place (Matt 24:15), where the worship of the True God is replaced by the worship of Man and “Human Fraternity.” The antipope Leo XIV, the Hashemite King, the Grand Imam of Al-Azhar, and “Fr.” Bader are united in a common front against the Regnum Christi.
True Catholic solidarity with the victims in Hammoud would consist in:
1. Offering the Holy Mass (the Unbloody Sacrifice of Calvary) for the repose of their souls, conditional on their baptismal state.
2. Praying for the conversion of their killers and of the Muslim nation of Jordan to the One True Faith.
3. Denouncing the false “interfaith” initiatives as instruments of the Devil to lull souls into the sleep of death.
4. Proclaiming the Social Kingship of Christ the King, demanding that the State publicly confess Him and order its laws according to His Commandments.
“Non est pax, dicit Dominus, impiis” (Isa 48:22). There is no peace for the wicked. The “peace” celebrated in the article is the peace of the world, which Christ explicitly refused to give (John 14:27). The only true solidarity is in Unum Corpus (1 Cor 10:17), in the Unity of the Faith, under the one Head, Christ Jesus, represented on earth by a true Pope — not the usurpers of the Vatican since 1958. The blood of the Jordanian victims cries out not for “dialogue,” but for the Vindex Sanguinis, the Avenger of Blood, who will judge the living and the dead at His Coming in Majesty.
Source:
Wave of solidarity between Muslims and Christians following attack in Jordan (vaticannews.va)
Date: 27.10.2026