The EWTN News portal reports the death of the conciliar “Bishop” Jorge Pedro Carrión Pavlich of Puno, Peru, at age 76, occurring merely two days after the demise of “Archbishop” Richard Daniel Alarcón Urrutia of Cusco. Both functionaries of the neo-church perished less than two weeks before the scheduled arrival of the usurper antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) for a November 11–16 “apostolic journey.” The article notes Prevost’s two-decade tenure in Peru as “missionary” and “bishop of Chiclayo” under the previous usurpers, framing the visit as a homecoming. The conciliar “bishops’ conference” issued a statement of condolence, thanking God for Carrión’s “life and his dedication to the service of the Church.” This report, stripped of all supernatural reference, reveals the conciliar sect for what it is: a purely human institution managing personnel transitions while the true Church of Christ endures its passion in the catacombs.
The Vacancy of the See and the Nullity of the Hierarchy
The article speaks of “Bishop Jorge Pedro Carrión Pavlich” and “Archbishop Richard Daniel Alarcón Urrutia” as if they held legitimate ecclesiastical office. From the perspective of integral Catholic theology, this is a radical fiction. Since the usurpation of the papal throne by the Modernist clique in 1958 with the election of Angelo Roncalli (John XXIII), the See of Peter has been vacant, and the sacramental hierarchy has been decimated by the introduction of the invalid *Novus Ordo* rites of ordination and episcopal consecration (1968). Pope Pius XII, in *Sacramentum Ordinis* (1947), defined the matter and form of Holy Orders with dogmatic precision; the post-conciliar rites, fabricated by the freemason Annibale Bugnini and his cohorts, altered the essential form, removing the explicit signification of the sacerdotal power to offer the *Propitiatory Sacrifice* and the episcopal power to govern. As Leo XIII taught in *Apostolicae Curae* (1896), a defect in form renders the sacrament *null and void* (*irritum et inane*). Consequently, Carrión and Alarcón were never true bishops, but mere laymen clad in purple, exercising a juridical fiction within a paramasonic structure. Their “ordination” and “consecration” in the years 2000 and prior, under the “pontificate” of the heretic Wojtyła (John Paul II), utilized a rite that *ipso facto* cannot transmit the character of Order. The “Church” they served is not the *Una, Sancta, Catholica et Apostolica* but the *ecclesia novae adventus*, the Church of the New Advent, the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place (Matt. 24:15).
Linguistic Naturalism: The Vocabulary of an NGO
The language of the EWTN report is strikingly devoid of the *sensus fidei*. It reads like a corporate press release: “led the Diocese of Puno for more than 24 years,” “helping prepare for the pope’s stop,” “published schedule,” “bishops’ conference issued a statement of condolence.” There is not a single mention of the *Missa Tridentina*, the *Unbloody Sacrifice of Calvary*, the state of grace, the Last Rites (*Extrema Unctio*), the salvation of souls, or the judgment of God. The word “Church” is used equivocally to denote the visible, sociological structure occupying the buildings. This is the *lex loquendi* of the *novus ordo* religion: a bureaucratic, horizontal, immanentist idiom that has expelled the vertical, the sacrificial, the eternal. St. Pius X condemned this spirit in *Pascendi Dominici Gregis* (1907) as the Modernist reduction of religion to “vital immanence” and historical evolution. The article’s focus on the “itinerary” of the antipope — “Puno is not on the itinerary” — reduces the Vicar of Christ (or his counterfeit) to a head of state on a diplomatic tour. *Lex orandi, lex credendi, lex vivendi*: the prayer of the neo-church is the Novus Ordo Missae, a Protestantized memorial; its belief is Modernism; its life is worldly administration.
The Antipope’s “Homecoming”: Consolidation of the Usurpation
The article highlights that Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) “served for two decades in Peru as a missionary and later as bishop of Chiclayo.” This biographical detail is deployed to legitimize his claim to the papacy, suggesting a pastoral continuity that masks the doctrinal rupture. Prevost, a creature of the Bergoglian revolution, was “elected” by a “conclave” of cardinals almost all of whom were appointed by the heretics Wojtyła, Ratzinger, and Bergoglio — men who publicly professed the condemned errors of religious liberty (*Dignitatis Humanae*), false ecumenism (*Unitatis Redintegratio*), and collegiality (*Lumen Gentium*). As the Syllabus of Pius IX (1864) anathematizes: “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (Error 80). Prevost *is* that reconciliation incarnate. His visit to Peru is not a pastoral visitation *in nomine Domini* but a political tour by the head of a rival religion to consolidate his control over the South American franchise of the conciliar sect. The deaths of Carrión and Alarcón merely clear the deck for new appointments by the usurper, ensuring the *sede vacante* at the local level is filled by men fully committed to the *aggiornamento* of apostasy.
The Theological Impossibility of “Service to the Church” in the Sect
The “bishops’ conference” statement thanks God for Carrión’s “dedication to the service of the Church.” This is the supreme blasphemy of the conciliar era: the identification of the *Mystical Body of Christ* with a visible society that teaches heresy, worships invalidly, and disciplines immorally. Pius XI, in *Quas Primas* (1925), proclaimed: “His reign extends not only to Catholic nations… but His reign encompasses also all non-Christians, so that most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ.” The conciliar sect, by its *Dignitatis Humanae*, denies this Kingship, placing the state above the Church and conscience above Revelation. To “serve” this sect is to serve the *mysterium iniquitatis* (2 Thess. 2:7). Carrión and Alarcón, if they died in the internal forum adhering to the false magisterium of Vatican II, died outside the *arcana salutis*. The Church teaches *Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus* (Fourth Lateran Council, 1215; Boniface VIII, *Unam Sanctam*, 1302). The “Church” of the “bishops’ conference” is not the Church of Christ. The article’s silence on the eternal destiny of these men — no mention of prayers for the *repose of the soul* in the traditional sense, no *Requiem Mass*, no *Libera me, Domine* — is the silence of the grave. They have been processed by the machine.
EWTN: The Propaganda Arm of the Abomination
The source, EWTN News, founded by the “Mother Angelica” (Rita Rizzo) under the “pontificate” of Wojtyła, has always been the media flagship of the “conservative” wing of the conciliar sect. Its function is to legitimize the usurpers by wrapping the novelties in a veneer of piety and “orthodoxy” defined by adherence to the *current* “pope.” It practices the *hermeneutic of continuity* condemned by Archbishop Lefebvre (himself a contradictory figure who recognized the usurpers) as a trap. The article’s translation from “EWTN News Español” and adaptation by “EWTN News English” shows the industrial scale of this disinformation. The reporter, Diego F. López Marina, a “Communication Sciences” graduate, functions as a secular journalist covering a secular beat. There is no *sensus Catholicus* in the byline, only professional credentials. This is the *laicization* of the apostolate foretold by St. Pius X: “The Church listening cooperates… the Church teaching should only approve the common opinions of the Church listening” (*Lamentabili Sane Exitu*, 1907, Prop. 6). EWTN is the voice of the “Church listening” to the world.
The Symptomatic Significance: A House of Cards
Two “bishops” die in forty-eight hours. The antipope arrives in eleven days. The “schedule” proceeds. This is the *modus operandi* of a human institution: *the show must go on*. There is no sense of *vacans sedes*, no interregnum, no penitential mourning for the death of shepherds (true or false). The Syllabus of Pius IX (Error 55) condemns: “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church.” The conciliar sect has achieved the inverse: it has become a state, a Vatican City State recognized by the UN, conducting diplomacy, managing “dioceses” as administrative districts, processing “bishops” as middle managers. The deaths of Carrión and Alarcón are “vacancies” to be filled by the “Dicastery for Bishops” (formerly Congregation). The *Canon 188.4* of the 1917 Code — “Every office becomes vacant by the mere fact and without any declaration by reason of tacit resignation… if the cleric publicly defects from the Catholic faith” — applies *a fortiori* to the entire conciliar hierarchy. They defected at Vatican II. Their offices have been vacant for sixty years. The “deaths” reported are merely the biological cessation of functionaries in a vacant structure. The true Church, *Ecclesia militans*, continues in the *remanentes* — the faithful priests and laity who keep the *Traditio* intact, celebrating the *Mass of All Time*, adhering to the *Quo Primum* of St. Pius V, rejecting the *Novus Ordo* and its ministers. *Non praevalebunt* (Matt. 16:18). The gates of hell shall not prevail against *Her* — not against the neo-church, which is their masterpiece.
Source:
Peru loses second bishop in two days as Pope Leo's visit nears (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 01.11.2026