The National Catholic Register portal, operating as a mouthpiece for the conciliar sect, reports on a gathering of the “Laudato Si’ Movement” Asia-Pacific chapters in Tagaytay City, Philippines, from October 24–27, 2026. The retreat, attended by delegates from Myanmar, South Korea, Timor-Leste, Indonesia, and the Philippines, finalized a strategic roadmap for 2027–2030 aimed at a “Vision 2035,” centering on “ecological conversion,” “synodal” decentralization, fossil fuel divestment, and collaboration with United Nations agencies and Greenpeace veterans. This assembly manifests the complete substitution of the Church’s supernatural mission for a naturalistic, Masonic, political agenda serving the Antichrist’s kingdom.
The “Laudato Si’ Movement”: A Paramasonic Instrument for Global Governance
The cited article reveals the Laudato Si’ Movement not as a Catholic apostolate, but as a non-governmental organization (NGO) masquerading as ecclesial structure. Founded in 2015 under the auspices of the manifest heretic Jorge Bergoglio (“Pope” Francis), it boasts “8,000 trained volunteers” and “nearly 900 member organizations” — metrics of corporate expansion, not spiritual fruit. Its “global strategic road map” was drafted over an “18-month process of listening to grassroots communities,” a purely sociological method condemned by Pope St. Pius X in Lamentabili sane exitu (prop. 59, 60, 64) which rejects the Modernist tenet that “Christ did not proclaim any specific, all-encompassing doctrine suitable for all times and peoples, but rather initiated a certain religious movement, applied or applicable to different times and places” and that “the progress of sciences requires a reform of the concept of Christian doctrine.”
The movement’s board chair, Yeb Saño, is identified as a former Greenpeace Southeast Asia director (2016–2025) and the Philippines’ chief climate negotiator at the United Nations. This is not incidental; it is structural. The Syllabus of Errors (Pope Pius IX, 1864) condemns the proposition: “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (Error 80). Here, the conciliar sect’s “lay leadership” is explicitly drawn from the very Masonic internationalist machinery (UN, Greenpeace) that seeks to “strike it with frequent blows, to shake it, to overthrow it, and, if possible, to make it disappear completely from the earth” (Pius IX, Allocution Quibus quantisque, 1849). The “ichthys” symbol adopted as the roadmap’s centerpiece is stripped of its christological meaning — Iesous Christos Theou Yios Soter — and reduced to a logo for “eco-spirituality,” “sustainable communities,” and “prophetic advocacy.”
Reduction of the Kingship of Christ to “Eco-Spirituality” and UN Advocacy
Pope Pius XI, in Quas Primas (1925), teaches with unshakeable authority: “Peace is only possible in the kingdom of Christ” and “His reign encompasses not only Catholic nations… but His reign encompasses also all non-Christians, so that most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ” (n. 28). The encyclical establishes that the social reign of Christ the King requires “all relations in the state be ordered on the basis of God’s commandments and Christian principles, both in the issuing of laws and in the administration of justice, as well as in the education and formation of youth in sound doctrine and purity of morals.”
The “Laudato Si’ Movement” replaces this divine mandate with “prophetic advocacy, which includes pressing for fair public policies and an end to investment in fossil fuels.” This is not the Church’s potestas indirecta in temporalibus for the salvation of souls; it is lobbying for the Masonic “Green New Deal” agenda. The article notes the South Korea chapter “protested against the Samcheok coal-fired power plant” and presses bishops for “net-zero carbon emissions” ahead of World Youth Day 2027. The Timor-Leste chapter “works with U.N. agencies and the government” and runs the “Local Conference of Youth.” The Indonesia chapter partners with the Archdiocese of Jakarta for mangrove planting and composting training.
This is the laicism condemned in Quas Primas: “the Church’s authority to teach men, to issue laws, to govern nations… was denied. And then, slowly, the Christian religion began to be equated with other false religions and shamelessly placed in the same category; then it was subordinated to secular power.” The “ecological conversion” proposed by Lorna Gold — “a conversion of the whole community, not only of the individual” — is a collectivist, naturalistic counterfeit of supernatural metanoia. True conversion is “turning to God with the whole heart” (Joel 2:12), effected by grace through the sacraments, not “community resilience” via composting workshops.
“Synodality” as Democratic Subversion of Divine Constitution
The article quotes Yeb Saño urging delegates to “decentralize leadership so the movement better reflects the synodal spirit of a Church that walks together.” This “synodal spirit” is the operational principle of the conciliar sect’s demolition of the monarchical constitution of the Church. Pope Pius VI, in Auctorem Fidei (1794), condemned the Jansenist-synodal heresy that “the Church’s power is not from above but from below.” Vatican I defined: “If anyone says that the Roman Pontiff has only an office of supervision and guidance, and not the full and supreme power of jurisdiction over the whole Church… let him be anathema” (DS 3064).
The “Laudato Si’ Movement” mimics this democratic inversion. Its “road map” emerges from “listening to grassroots communities” — the sensus fidelium weaponized by Modernists against the Magisterium. St. Pius X in Pascendi Dominici Gregis exposes this: “The Church listening cooperates in such a way with the Church teaching in defining truths of faith, that the Church teaching should only approve the common opinions of the Church listening” (Lamentabili, prop. 6). The movement’s structure — “animators,” “national chapters,” “Asia-Pacific secretariat,” “global strategic road map” — is a parallel paramasonic hierarchy supplanting the true hierarchy of jurisdiction.
Interfaith Syncretism and the “BEES Network” in Myanmar
The article states the Myanmar chapter “runs the BEES Network, which offers interfaith ecological education for young people.” This is a direct violation of the First Commandment and the dogma Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus. Pope Pius XI in Mortalium Animos (1928) condemns “those who hold the opinion… that all religions are more or less good and praiseworthy… which theory is clearly a step toward naturalism and atheism.” The Syllabus condemns: “Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation” (Error 16) and “Protestantism is nothing more than another form of the same true Christian religion” (Error 18).
“Interfaith ecological education” is religious indifferentism weaponized for climate ideology. It teaches youth that creed is irrelevant provided one cooperates in “care for creation.” This is the syncretism foretold by the False Fatima Apparitions analysis: “The imprecise formulation ‘conversion of Russia’ (without specifying Catholicism) opens the way to religious relativism. It can serve to legitimize dialogue with schismatic Orthodoxy.” Here, the “conversion” sought is not to the Catholic Faith, but to “sustainable development goals.”
Collaboration with the “Synagogue of Satan”: UN, Greenpeace, and Masonic Networks
Pope Pius IX, in the Syllabus allocution Quibus quantisque (1849), identifies the enemy: “anyone who knows the nature, desires and intentions of the sects, whether they be called masonic or bear another name… cannot doubt that the present misfortune must mainly be imputed to the frauds and machinations of these sects. It is from them that the synagogue of Satan… takes its strength.”
The “Laudato Si’ Movement” is thoroughly infiltrated by this machinery:
- Yeb Saño: Greenpeace (founded by Irving Stowe, Dorothy Stowe, Jim Bohlen — Quaker/pacifist/Masonic networks) and UN climate negotiator (UN = Masonic world government prototype).
- Timor-Leste chapter: “works with U.N. agencies and the government… helps run the country’s Local Conference of Youth.”
- Bishop Allwyn D’Silva: Chairs FABC Office of Human Development — the FABC being a conciliar “episcopal conference” structure unknown to Tradition, functioning as a collegialist rival to papal primacy.
- Lorna Gold: Executive director, speaking from Ireland, invoking St. Francis of Assisi’s “repair my house” for “ecological conversion” — a blasphemous misapplication of the saint’s mandate to rebuild the spiritual Church.
The Syllabus condemns: “The civil government, even when in the hands of an infidel sovereign, has a right to an indirect negative power over religious affairs” (Error 41) and “The entire government of public schools… may and ought to appertain to the civil power” (Error 45). Here, the conciliar sect voluntarily submits its “ecological” apostolate to UN agencies and civil governments, seeking their validation and funding.
The “SVD Laudato Si’ Farm”: Idolatry of Creation Replacing Worship of Creator
The retreat concluded at the “SVD Laudato Si’ Farm,” a 5.8-hectare site run by the Society of the Divine Word, described as “an ecological education center, a pilgrimage site, and an ecotourism destination.” St. Paul condemns this inversion: “They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator” (Rom 1:25). A “pilgrimage site” for “ecotourism” replaces the shrine of the Most Holy Sacrifice. The article’s closing quote from Laudato Si’ — “May our struggles and our concern for this planet never take away the joy of our hope” — seals the apostasy: hope is placed in the planet, not in the Beatific Vision.
Pope Pius XI in Quas Primas warns: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed… the entire human society had to be shaken, because it lacked a stable and strong foundation.” The “Laudato Si’ Movement” is the institutionalization of this shaking — a Masonic psychological operation (per the False Fatima analysis: “Stage 3 (1958-2000): Takeover of the narrative by modernists… ecumenical reinterpretation”) diverting the faithful from the one thing necessary (Luke 10:42): the salvation of souls through the Unbloody Sacrifice of Calvary and the social reign of Christ the King.
Sedevacantist Conclusion: The Conciliar Sect is the “Abomination of Desolation”
The “Laudato Si’ Movement” is a manifest fruit of the usurped See. Since John XXIII (1958), the claimants to the papacy have publicly taught heresy (religious liberty, ecumenism, collegiality, evolution of dogma), and by the principle ipso facto lost all jurisdiction (St. Robert Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice; Canon 188.4, 1917 Code; Pope Paul IV, Cum ex Apostolatus Officio). The “bishops,” “priests,” and “lay leaders” cited in this article operate outside the Church, in the conciliar sect / Church of the New Advent / paramasonic structure occupying the Vatican.
Their “eco-spirituality” is idolatry of Pachamama. Their “synodality” is democratic Masonry. Their “prophetic advocacy” is lobbying for the Antichrist’s temporal kingdom. The true Church — the Ecclesia Militans of valid bishops and priests holding the integral Faith — has no part in this apostasy. “You are Christ the King of glory!” (Ps 23:7-10, cited in Quas Primas). All “ecological conversion” that does not begin and end in conversion to the Catholic Faith and the Kingship of Christ is the broad road to perdition (Matt 7:13).
Source:
Wildfire Smoke, Conflict, and Conversion: Asian Laudato Si’ Groups Compare Notes in Philippines (ncregister.com)
Date: 03.11.2026