The Vatican News portal (November 6, 2026) reports the departure of the usurper Robert Prevost, styling himself “Pope Leo XIV,” on a twelve-day, 30,000-kilometer junket through Uruguay, Argentina, and Peru. The piece dwells obsessively on the antipope’s pulmonary health, his pride in exercising the “right to vote” in the American midterm elections, and the installation of Montserrat Alvarado as “Prefect of the Dicastery for Communication.” This theatrical voyage manifests the complete substitution of the supernatural mission of the Papacy with a naturalistic, political, and media-driven parody of the Vicariate of Christ.
The Usurper’s Itinerant Spectacle: Health as Propaganda
The article opens with a clinical bulletin: the antipope “underwent lung surgery,” was doubted by “many,” yet remained “convinced that this trip had to go forward.” He boasts of being in “fairly good shape,” attributing his recovery to “good doctors and a healthy lifestyle.” This obsession with biological vitality and medical technology reveals the conciliar sect‘s purely naturalistic anthropology. True Popes, as Vicars of Christ, traveled to confirm the brethren in the faith (Luke 22:32), not to display their pulmonary capacity to a global press corps. The presence of a “medical staff accompanying him” and the detail that he spent his convalescence reading “the breviary, the prayer book, and the newspapers” — placing the ephemeral noise of the world on par with the Divine Office — epitomizes the laicism condemned by Pius XI: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed” (Quas Primas, citing Ubi Arcano). The “82 journalists accompanying him” are not witnesses to the Missio Petri but to a celebrity tour.
The “Right to Vote”: Subversion of Christ’s Kingship by Democratic Idolatry
The most theologically grotesque moment occurs when the usurper declares: “I am proud to be American and to exercise the right to vote.” He adds he would have voted in Peru had remote voting been possible, calling it “a good thing.” Here the antipope explicitly endorses the condemned heresy of Americanism and the democratic principle that authority rises from the multitude, not from God.
Pope Leo said, “I have already made a statement about this. I am proud to be American and to exercise the right to vote.” He explained that he had not voted in Peru, where he also holds citizenship, because there was no way for him to vote remotely. Had it been possible, however, he would have done so. “It is a good thing,” he said.
This statement anathematizes itself. The Syllabus of Errors (Pius IX, 1864) condemns the proposition: “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (Error 80). It condemns the lie that “In the present day it is no longer expedient that the Catholic religion should be held as the only religion of the State” (Error 77) and that “civil liberty of every form of worship… conduce more easily to corrupt the morals and minds of the people” is false (Error 79). By voting, the usurper participates in the myth of popular sovereignty, denying the Social Kingship of Christ taught infallibly in Quas Primas: “Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ… For this reason, the entire human society had to be shaken, because it lacked a stable and strong foundation.” A true Pope cannot “vote” in a system that enshrines religious indifference and the exclusion of Christ from the public square; to do so is to abdicate the Kingship of Christ in favor of the kingship of the ballot box.
The New Prefect of Communication: Consolidating the Narrative of the Neo-Church
The introduction of Maria Montserrat Alvarado as “Prefect of the Dicastery for Communication” — praised for her “wonderful experience, creativity, life and liveliness” — signals the tightening of the paramasonic structure‘s grip on the narrative. The Dicastery for Communication is the Propaganda Fide of the abomination of desolation, tasked not with spreading the Depositum Fidei but with managing the brand of the Church of the New Advent.
The Pope formally introduced the new Prefect of the Dicastery for Communication, Maria Montserrat Alvarado… He praised her “wonderful experience,” “creativity,” “life and liveliness,” saying she would accompany them on the visit and help the Vatican and the Pope “in the very important dimension of communication.”
This “dimension of communication” is the modus operandi of Modernism, condemned in Lamentabili Sane Exitu (Prop. 58: “Truth changes with man, because it develops with him, in him, and through him“) and Pascendi Dominici Gregis. The “creativity” lauded by the usurper is the nova et vetera of the Modernist, corrupting the immutable truth. The isolation of Sister Lucia noted in the False Fatima file — “control of the narrative through Lucia’s isolation” — finds its institutional apex here: a global media apparatus ensuring no dissent from the hermeneutic of rupture reaches the faithful.
Missionary Rhetoric vs. The Silence on the Social Reign of Christ the King
The usurper describes his mission as “sharing the joy of the Gospel, announcing the Good News, and walking together with people.” This vocabulary — “walking together,” “closeness,” “sharing joy” — is the lingua franca of the synodal church, devoid of convert, baptize, condemn error, reign. Pius XI instituted the Feast of Christ the King precisely because “very many have removed Jesus Christ and His most holy law from their customs, from private, family, and public life” (Quas Primas). The antipope’s silence on the public reign of Christ over the nations he visits (Uruguay, Argentina, Peru) is deafening. He speaks of “the message of hope in today’s world,” a horizontal, immanent hope, not the spes contra spem of the Cross.
The visit to Argentina is explicitly framed as “a tribute to Pope Francis… visiting his country, which he was unable to visit.” This is the cult of the antipope canonizing his predecessor in the usurpation. Bergoglio was a manifest heretic who, by the principle articulated by St. Robert Bellarmine and Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code, ipso facto lost all jurisdiction: “A manifest heretic… by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head… he cannot be the head of something of which he is not a member” (Defense of Sedevacantism, citing Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice). To pay “tribute” to a heretic usurper is to legitimize the usurpation.
The “Peace” of the World vs. The Peace of Christ
Regarding Ukraine, the usurper offers the standard secular platitude: “Thank God for what has been achieved, but there is still much work to be done to achieve peace.” This is the peace of the world (John 14:27), severed from the Peace of Christ in the Kingdom of Christ (Quas Primas). Quas Primas teaches: “The hope of lasting peace will not yet shine upon nations as long as individuals and states renounce and do not wish to recognize the reign of our Savior.” The conciliar sect seeks peace through truces and diplomacy (the “Oleshky truce”), ignoring the Syllabus condemnation of the error that “The civil government… has a right to an indirect negative power over religious affairs” (Error 41) and that “The Church ought to be separated from the State” (Error 55). True peace requires the consecratio of nations to the Sacred Heart — not the Masonic caricature of Fatima, but the authentic act commanded by Pius XI and Leo XIII — and the confession of Christ’s Kingship in parliaments and constitutions.
Symptomatic Conclusion: The Abomination of Desolation in Action
This “Apostolic Journey” is a masterpiece of counter-liturgy. The gifts — a Chicago White Sox baseball, an Andean hat, a plaque for a hypothetical 2027 Camino flight — symbolize the inculturation of the Gospel into the trivial and the touristic. The antipope jokes about ruining cassocks with markers; true Popes wept over the ruin of souls.
The False Fatima file identifies the strategy: “Stage 3 (1958-2000): Takeover of the narrative by modernists, concealment of the Third Secret, ecumenical reinterpretation.” We are now in the terminal phase: the total secularization of the Petrine ministry. The usurper votes, travels as a head of state, manages a media conglomerate, and offers humanitarian bromides. He does not teach, not govern, not sanctify. He occupies the See of Peter sine titulo, fulfilling St. Paul’s prophecy of the man of sin… sitting in the temple of God, showing himself as if he were God (2 Thess 2:3-4).
The faithful remnant must recognize this spectacle for what it is: the non serviam of the neo-church paraded before the cameras. “There is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12), and no other King but Christ Jesus. The “right to vote” is a rebellion against His Crown. The “Dicastery for Communication” is a tower of Babel against His Truth. The journey to South America is a pilgrimage to the idols of democracy and progress. Quas Primas remains the condemnation of this age: “When all willingly accept the reign of Christ and obey Him, and every tongue will confess that our Lord Jesus Christ is in the glory of God the Father.” Until then, the abomination of desolation continues its “apostolic journeys,” and the true Church endures in the catacombs of Tradition, sine macula et ruga.
Source:
Pope Leo XIV was ‘confident South America trip would go ahead’ (vaticannews.va)
Date: 06.11.2026