The EWTN News portal reports that the usurper “Pope” Leo XIV (Robert Prevost), on his first day in Argentina, delivered a purely naturalistic address to the Masonic republic’s president, Javier Milei, and the assembled civil authorities, focusing exclusively on temporal social ills—crime, inequality, polarization, migration—while maintaining a studied silence on the Social Kingship of Christ, the necessity of the Catholic confession of states, and the salvation of souls. This spectacle of a false pontiff legitimizing a liberal dictatorship and reducing the Church’s mission to humanitarian NGO activism constitutes the quintessence of the post-conciliar apostasy.
The Farce of a “Pastoral” Visit to a Masonic Republic
The cited article relates that the antipope Prevost presented himself “as a pastor” yet immediately surrendered the supernatural mandate of the Keys to the temporal agenda of a self-described “anarcho-capitalist” head of state. The meeting at the Casa Rosada—the very seat of the anti-Catholic Argentine republic born from the Masonic revolutions of the 19th century—symbolizes the complete capitulation of the conciliar sect to the Civitas Diaboli. Milei, who publicly blasphemed the previous antipope Bergoglio as a “filthy leftist” and wields a chainsaw as a symbol of his liberal economic violence, is now hailed by the current usurper as a legitimate interlocutor for the “common good.” This is not pastoral charity; it is political collaborationism with the enemies of Christ the King. As Pius XI thundered in Quas Primas: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” The antipope’s presence validates the Masonic principle that the State is the source of all rights (Syllabus, Error 39), betraying the regnum Christi for a mess of democratic pottage.
Reduction of the Divine Mission to Secular Humanitarianism
The speech enumerated “organized crime, human trafficking networks, arms and drug trafficking together with corruption” as evils undermining “social cohesion.” Nowhere does the text record a single mention of sin, eternal damnation, the necessity of Baptism, or the rights of Christ the King over nations. The “common good” invoked is the bonum commune temporale of the pagans, stripped of its supernatural finality. The antipope speaks of “families facing an uncertain future, the unemployed, the elderly” and “young people driven to emigrate”—purely sociological categories. This is the heresy of humanitarianism condemned by St. Pius X in Lamentabili Sane Exitu (Prop. 58, 59, 65): the reduction of Christian doctrine to a “certain religious movement… applicable to different times and places” (Prop. 59), the transformation of the Church into a “broad and liberal Protestantism” (Prop. 65). The “Church” of the New Advent has no Gospel to preach, only the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals dressed in ecclesiastical purple.
The Democratic Idolatry and the Silence on Christ’s Kingship
The antipope explicitly praised “democracy” as strengthened “through willingness to listen… through the patient search for agreement… ability to see those who think differently as fellow citizens.” This is a direct endorsement of the condemned errors of the Syllabus: “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church” (Error 55); “In the present day it is no longer expedient that the Catholic religion should be held as the only religion of the State” (Error 77); “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself… with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (Error 80). By praising the “spirit of trust” of democratic pluralism, Prevost places the vox populi above the vox Dei. He ignores Pius XI’s decree in Quas Primas that “rulers of states… have the duty to publicly honor Christ and obey Him” and that “the state must leave the same freedom to the members of Orders… who contribute most to the expansion and establishment of Christ’s Kingdom.” The antipope’s democracy is the antithesis of the Social Kingship of Christ; it is the laicism which Pius XI called “the plague that poisons human society.”
Scandalous Complicity with the Cult of the Heretic Bergoglio
The article notes that Milei lauded the deceased antipope Francis (Jorge Bergoglio) as “an exceptional figure who inspired us all with his humanity, regardless of our creed.” The phrase “regardless of our creed” is the essence of indifferentism (Syllabus, Errors 15-18). The antipope Prevost, far from correcting this blasphemy, “opened his own speech by recalling his predecessor, saying the universal Church had ‘listened to the voice of an Argentinian pope’ for years.” This is a canonization of a manifest heretic by implication. Bergoglio, the architect of Amoris Laetitia, the Abu Dhabi declaration, and the Pachamama idolatry, is enshrined as a model of “humanity.” St. Robert Bellarmine teaches (De Romano Pontifice) that a manifest heretic “by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head… as he ceases to be a Christian.” To praise him is to praise the destroyer of the Faith. The applause of the diplomats and politicians—“reminiscent of a parliament or a political convention”—confirms the nature of this assembly: a synagogue of Satan (Apoc. 2:9) celebrating the triumph of the ecclesia novae adventus over the Ecclesia Catholica.
The Token Mention of the Unborn: Hypocrisy as Strategy
The article states the antipope “urged the country’s leaders to make room for the unborn.” This solitary, fleeting reference—buried amidst the worship of democracy and economic equity—functions as a fig leaf for apostasy. The conciliar sect uses the unborn as a bargaining chip in the political arena while denying the principium of their defense: the Kingship of Christ and the infallible moral law. Pius XI taught that “Christ received from the Father unlimited right over all that is created” (Quas Primas). A “defense of life” detached from the Social Reign of Christ the King is mere philanthropic sentimentalism, acceptable to the Masonic lodges because it poses no threat to the novus ordo saeculorum. The antipope’s call is not a prophetic “Non possumus” against the culture of death, but a whisper in the ear of the powerful to manage the slaughter slightly more humanely.
Symptomatic Diagnosis: The Abomination of Desolation in Action
This visit is not an anomaly; it is the modus operandi of the paramasonic structure occupying the Vatican since 1958. The “Church” of the New Advent has no authority to teach, govern, or sanctify (Lamentabili, Props. 21, 22, 54), having defected from the Faith (Cum ex Apostolatus Officio, Canon 188.4). Its “pope” is a layman (invalidly “ordained” in the Pauline rite, consecrated in the Montinian rite), a manifest heretic who ipso facto lost any putative office (Bellarmine, Wernz-Vidal). His travels are not apostolic journeys but diplomatic tours of a false religion, seeking modus vivendi with the Civitas Terrena. The silence on the Mass, the Sacraments, Grace, the Last Things, and the Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus is the gravest accusation. The antipope Prevost offers Argentina not the Pax Christi in Regno Christi, but the pax diaboli in regno hominis. Vae qui vocant malum bonum, et bonum malum (Is. 5:20). The true Church of Christ endures only in the catacombs of Tradition, professing the integral Faith, awaiting the restoration of the Sacerdotium and the Imperium under the true Vicar of Christ.
Source:
In Argentina, Pope Leo XIV highlights social problems (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 08.11.2026