The Vatican News portal reports on the visit of the usurper Robert Prevost (“Pope” Leo XIV) to Argentina (November 7–11, 2026), presenting interviews with the conciliar “Archbishop” Marcelo Colombo of Mendoza, President of the Argentine Episcopal Conference, and the “Archbishop” of Buenos Aires, Jorge García Cuerva. The piece drips with the banal enthusiasm of the neo-church: “joy,” “communion,” “synodal path,” “everyone is welcome,” and a vacuous “dignity of the person” stripped of its supernatural end. The conciliar prelates celebrate the mobilization of crowds for a false pope, explicitly linking his agenda to the apostasy of Jorge Mario Bergoglio (“Pope” Francis), and propose a pastoral program reduced to naturalistic accompaniment, youth entertainment, and vague “family values” — all while maintaining a studious silence on the Social Kingship of Christ, the necessity of the Catholic Church for salvation, the reality of sin, grace, and the Final Judgment. This reportage is not a chronicle of a Catholic event; it is the manifesto of a counterfeit religion that has replaced the regnum Christi with the regnum hominis.
The Usurpation of the Papacy and the Nullity of the Conciliar Hierarchy
The entire edifice of the reported event rests upon a metaphysical lie: that Robert Prevost is the Roman Pontiff. From the perspective of integral Catholic theology, the See of Peter has been vacant since the death of Pius XII (1958). The line of claimants — John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul I, John Paul II, Benedict XVI, Francis, and now Leo XIV — are not popes but manifest heretics who, by their public adhesion to the Modernist synthesis condemned by St. Pius X in Pascendi Dominici Gregis and Lamentabili Sane Exitu, have automatically severed themselves from the Body of the Church. As St. Robert Bellarmine teaches, a manifest heretic, by that very fact, ceases to be Pope and head, just as he ceases to be a Christian and member of the Church (De Romano Pontifice, lib. 2, cap. 30). The “Defense of Sedevacantism” file confirms this: heretics are already outside the Church before excommunication and deprived of all jurisdiction; they have been condemned by their own judgment (Titus 3:10–11). Therefore, the “Archbishops” Colombo and García Cuerva, ordained and appointed within this paramasonic structure, possess no canonical mission. Their “interviews” are the deliberations of laymen usurping ecclesiastical office, devoid of any authority to teach, govern, or sanctify.
“Everyone Is Welcome”: The Dogma of Indifferentism Enthroned
The motto of the visit, “Everyone is welcome,” proclaimed as a triumph by García Cuerva — “I think we have made ‘Everyone is welcome’ a reality” — is the practical application of the heresy of indifferentism condemned by Pope Pius IX in the Syllabus of Errors (1864). Proposition 15: “Every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which, guided by the light of reason, he shall consider true.” Proposition 16: “Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation.” Proposition 18: “Protestantism is nothing more than another form of the same true Christian religion.” The conciliar “Church” has made the Syllabus its pastoral program. By refusing to proclaim Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus, by refusing to call non-Catholics to conversion, by celebrating mere presence as a good in itself, the Argentine hierarchy confirms its apostasy. The “joy” of the crowds is the joy of the world recognizing its own; as Our Lord said, “If you were of the world, the world would love its own” (John 15:19).
The “Synodal Path”: Democratization of the Divine Constitution
Colombo explicitly states that the Argentine hierarchy has been “following the synodal path first proposed to us by Pope Francis, which Pope Leo now invites us to pursue more deeply.” This “synodality” is the ecclesiastical form of the democratic error condemned by Pius IX (Syllabus, Prop. 77–80) and by St. Pius X in Lamentabili (Prop. 52–56): the substitution of the divine, hierarchical constitution of the Church (Episcopus, successores Apostolorum) with a “people of God” governed by consultation, consensus, and the “sensus fidei” of the laity. The Syllabus condemns the proposition that “the civil government… has a right to an indirect negative power over religious affairs” (Prop. 41); the conciliar church has internalized this principle, making the “synodal assembly” a parliament where truth is voted upon. Colombo’s call to “read his words more closely, discuss them, and share them in a spirit of fraternity” is the language of a political party, not the Ecclesia docens receiving the depositum fidei.
Reduction of the Kingship of Christ to Naturalistic Humanism
Pius XI, in Quas Primas (1925), instituted the Feast of Christ the King precisely to combat the plague described in this article: “the secularism of our times, so-called laicism, its errors and wicked endeavors” which “began with the denial of Christ the Lord’s reign over all nations”. The encyclical declares: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed”. The Argentine “bishops” speak of “dignity of the person,” “social dialogue,” “invitation to work together as a society,” and “care of the lives of the poor and vulnerable” — all categories of natural law and secular humanism, utterly emptied of their supernatural reference. There is no mention of the regnum Christi extending over civil society, no call for the State to “publicly honor Christ and obey Him” (Quas Primas), no warning that “the state is happy not by one means, and man by another; for the state is nothing else than a harmonious association of men” (St. Augustine, cited in Quas Primas, n. 30) only when ordered to God. The “family” defended by Leo XIV and García Cuerva is a naturalistic institution; the true Christian family is a domestica ecclesia ordered to the sanctification of souls, indissoluble by divine law (Syllabus, Prop. 67), not a “model” to be “accompanied” amid “storms.”
Youth Ministry as Entertainment: The Cult of Man Replaces the Cult of God
García Cuerva’s description of the youth event — “performance we presented to the Holy Father, put on by young people, brought together art, dance, and music” — reveals the liturgy of the neo-church: anthropocentric spectacle. St. Pius X condemned the Modernist error that “Christ did not proclaim any specific, all-encompassing doctrine suitable for all times and peoples, but rather initiated a certain religious movement” (Lamentabili, Prop. 59). The “restless hearts” of the young (citing St. Augustine) are not directed to the Unbloody Sacrifice of Calvary, to the confession of sins, to the Rosary, to the Catechism of the Council of Trent, but to “art, dance, and music” and “accompaniment in their vulnerability.” This is the cultus hominis prophesied by the Syllabus (Prop. 58: “No other forces are to be recognized except those which reside in matter… and the gratification of pleasure”). The “priests” and “religious” are told to “return to prayer and to our first love” — but which Christ? The Christ of the Modernists, who is “considerably lower than the Christ of faith” (Lamentabili, Prop. 29), a mere man whose “consciousness” evolved? The silence on the Mass, the priesthood, the sacraments, and the state of grace is the loudest condemnation.
Continuity with the Apostasy of Francis: The “Legacy” of a Heretic
Colombo admits the visit is a continuation of the Bergoglian revolution: “he brings us the richness of a legacy that is always the Gospel, translated for our times into the choices of the universal Church.” This “legacy” includes Amoris Laetitia (adultery permitted), Fratelli Tutti (fraternity without Christ), the Abu Dhabi Declaration (pluralism of religions willed by God), and the persecution of the Traditional Mass. The Syllabus condemns the proposition that “the Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (Prop. 80). Francis did exactly that; Leo XIV deepens it. The “new agenda, new emphases” are simply the next stage of the operation described in the “False Fatima Apparitions” file: “Stage 3 (1958–2000): Takeover of the narrative by modernists, concealment of the Third Secret, ecumenical reinterpretation” — now extended to 2026. The “joy” of the people applauding Francis’s name is the joy of those who “have removed Jesus Christ and His most holy law from their customs, from private, family, and public life” (Quas Primas, opening).
The Silence on the Supernatural: The Gravest Accusation
Read the interviews again. Not one word on: the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass (the Unbloody Sacrifice of Calvary), the Real Presence, the necessity of Baptism for salvation, the reality of Hell, the Last Judgment, the Immaculate Conception, the Assumption, the Rosary, the Brown Scapular, the duty of the State to profess the Catholic Faith, the condemnation of Freemasonry, the errors of Communism, the necessity of the Social Kingship of Christ. This is not an omission; it is the definition of the conciliar sect. As Pius XI wrote: “The Kingdom of our Redeemer encompasses all men… His reign extends not only to Catholic nations… but His reign encompasses also all non-Christians” (Quas Primas, citing Leo XIII). The Argentine “bishops” preach a kingdom of man, by man, for man. They are the blind leading the blind into the pit (Matt. 15:14).
Conclusion: The Abomination of Desolation in the Holy Place
The visit of Leo XIV to Argentina, and the enthusiastic collaboration of the local conciliar hierarchy, is a public manifestation of the abominatio desolationis standing where it ought not (Mark 13:14). The structures occupying the Vatican, the cathedrals, and the episcopal palaces are not the Catholic Church; they are a paramasonic structure, a Church of the New Advent, a neo-church that has non est Christus at its center. The faithful who retain the integral Catholic Faith — the remanentes — must have no communion with these men, their “Masses,” their “sacraments” (invalidated by new rites and defect of intention), their “canonizations,” their “synods.” Return to the immutable Tradition. Recognize the vacancy of the See. Pray for a true Pope. Reject the counterfeit. Non praevalebunt.
Source:
Argentine Bishops to take up Pope Leo’s challenges for pastoral work (vaticannews.va)
Date: 11.11.2026