Antipope’s False Peace Diplomacy Betrays Catholic Truth
The [Catholic News Agency] portal (November 30, 2025) reports on the usurper Leo XIV’s discussions with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, focusing on geopolitical conflicts in Gaza and Ukraine. The antipope claims both leaders agreed on a “two-state solution” for Israel-Palestine and Turkey’s potential role in Ukrainian “peace efforts.” He praised his ecumenical liturgy with Patriarch Bartholomew I and floated plans for a pan-Christian gathering in 2033. The article frames this as a diplomatic triumph, omitting any reference to Christ’s Social Kingship or the Church’s exclusive mandate to convert nations.
Naturalism Replaces Supernatural Mission
The antipope’s promotion of a “two-state solution” constitutes blasphemous rebellion against divine authority. Pius XI’s Quas Primas (1925) dogmatically declares Christ’s right to reign over “not only private individuals, but also rulers and governments”, condemning all attempts to exclude Him from statecraft. By treating the Holy Land as mere territorial dispute, the Vatican occupiers deny Psalm 2:8’s promise: “I shall give thee the Gentiles for thy inheritance, and the utmost parts of the earth for thy possession.” The article’s silence on Jerusalem’s de jure status as Christ’s royal capital exposes the conciliar sect’s materialist worldview.
Ecumenical Apostasy Masquerading as Peacemaking
Leo XIV’s celebration of Eastern Orthodox liturgy with Patriarch Bartholomew constitutes formal participation in schism. Pius XI’s Mortalium Animos (1928) anathematizes such acts: “The Apostolic See cannot on any terms take part in their assemblies, nor is it anyway lawful for Catholics either to support or to work for such enterprises.” The proposed 2033 gathering in Jerusalem continues Vatican II’s false ecumenism, equating Christ’s Mystical Body with heretical sects – a heresy condemned by Pope Pius IX’s Syllabus of Errors (Errors 17-18).
Turkish Manipulation of Christian Destiny
The article’s praise for Turkey’s “peacemaking role” ignores Ankara’s century-long persecution of Christians. Between 1915-1923, Ottoman Turks slaughtered 1.5 million Armenians, Greeks, and Assyrians – a genocide never mentioned by the conciliar sect. Pius X’s 1907 Lamentabili Sane condemned the error that “truth changes with man” (Error 58), yet the antipope treats Islamist regimes as equal partners in shaping Christendom’s future. This fulfills Pius IX’s warning against those who “place the eternal salvation of all those who are not in the true Church of Christ” (Syllabus, Error 17).
Omission of Christ’s Exclusive Mediation
Nowhere does the article mention repentance, conversion, or the necessity of submitting nations to Christ the King. The antipope’s call for “dialogue” and “ceasefire” replaces the Church’s mandate to “make disciples of all nations” (Matthew 28:19) with UN-style conflict management. St. Pius X’s Pascendi Dominici Gregis (1907) exposed this Modernist tactic: “They put aside the immutable, and spend their time on the mutable.” True peace comes only through the Regnum Christi, not Erdogan’s geopolitical calculations.
Conclusion: Betrayal of the Apostolic Mandate
This diplomatic theater proves the conciliar sect has become a geopolitical NGO. Leo XIV’s actions fulfill Paul IV’s Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio (1559), which declares that prelates promoting heresies “shall be deprived by the law itself of their dignity… and let them be avoided by all as magicians, idolaters, and heresiarchs.” Until true hierarchy restores Christ’s Social Reign, no “peace efforts” can succeed, for “unless the Lord build the house, they labor in vain that build it” (Psalm 127:1).
Source:
Pope Leo says Erdogan talks focused on Gaza and Ukraine, sees Turkish role in peace efforts (catholicnewsagency.com)
Date: 30.11.2025