Apostate’s Pilgrimage: Syncretism Masquerading as Sanctity at St. Charbel’s Tomb
The VaticanNews portal reports on “Pope” Leo XIV’s December 1, 2025 visit to the tomb of St. Charbel Makhlouf at the Monastery of St. Maron in Annaya, Lebanon. Amidst rain-soaked crowds waving Lebanese and Vatican flags, the antipope knelt before the saint’s relics while a choir sang. He declared St. Charbel a teacher of prayer for “those who live without God” and entreated the monk’s intercession for “peace in Lebanon and the Levant” through “conversion of hearts.” The article highlights Muslims venerating St. Charbel and presents the event as an ecumenical gathering promoting interfaith harmony. This spectacle exemplifies the conciliar sect’s sacrilegious marriage of Catholic symbolism with modernist heresy.
Canonical Illegitimacy of Post-Conciliar “Sainthood”
The very premise of this pilgrimage rests on the false canonization of Charbel Makhlouf by Paul VI in 1977. As Pius XII solemnly taught in Munificentissimus Deus (1950), canonizations demand “infallible pontifical definition” (para. 20), which the antipopes lack by virtue of their manifest heresy. St. Robert Bellarmine’s principle applies: “A manifest heretic cannot be pope” (De Romano Pontifice II.30). Paul VI’s promulgation of the blasphemous New Mass alone constitutes formal heresy against the “perpetual and unchangeable position” of the Roman Rite (Pius V, Quo Primum). Thus, Charbel’s “sainthood” remains a theatrical fiction devoid of sacramental validity.
Naturalistic Reduction of Sanctity
The antipope’s speech reduces Charbel’s monastic witness to a mere humanistic exemplar:
“The Holy Spirit formed him so that he could teach those who live without God how to pray… those who seek riches how to be poor.”
Contrast this with Pius XI’s encyclical Quas Primas (1925), which declares that Christ’s Kingship requires nations to “obey not only His laws but His Church” (para. 19). Leo XIV’s omission of Charbel’s conversion of Muslims to Catholicism – the true mark of sanctity – exposes the conciliar sect’s rejection of “no salvation outside the Church” (Boniface VIII, Unam Sanctam). His vague appeal for “conversion of hearts” deliberately avoids specifying conversion to the Catholic Faith, thereby embracing the condemned error of religious indifferentism (Pius IX, Syllabus of Errors, Proposition 15).
Syncretism Disguised as Veneration
The article boasts that “St. Charbel is also venerated amongst Muslims” and that “everyone comes here and asks for help.” This directly violates the First Commandment and Pius XI’s condemnation of false irenicism: “The apostolic mandate warns us to avoid men of perverse minds who proclaim peace when there is no peace.” (Mortalium Animos, 1928). True saints like St. Francis Xavier never sought Muslim veneration but “baptized over 100,000 pagans” (Pius X, Apostolic Letter, 1904) while destroying idols. The spectacle of Muslims kissing Charbel’s image constitutes sacrilege, not sanctity – a fact Leo XIV tacitly endorses through his silence.
Heretical Ecclesiology in Liturgical Gestures
Leo XIV’s kneeling before Charbel’s relics constitutes an act of sacrilegious simulation. As the Holy Office decreed in 1697, valid veneration of relics requires they belong to “true saints recognized by the Church’s infallible judgment” – impossible under antipopes. Moreover, the Code of Canon Law (1917) Canon 1258 forbids Catholics from participating in non-Catholic worship, yet the article describes Muslims engaging in pseudo-Catholic devotions. This violates Pius IX’s condemnation of those who “falsely assert the good of the Church requires the equal treatment of all religions” (Syllabus, Proposition 77).
Omission of Supernatural Realities
Nowhere does the antipope mention Charbel’s Eucharistic devotion, his Masses offered for the conversion of sinners, or his fidelity to the Extraordinary Form. Instead, Leo XIV reduces the saint to a humanitarian symbol: “a sign of hope, faith and peace for Lebanon.” Compare this to Pius XII’s teaching that saints “shine as lights of perfect sanctity before the throne of God, interceding for us who still struggle on earth” (Mediator Dei, 158). The conciliar sect’s silence on Charbel’s combat against heresy proves their agenda: to transform saints into neutered mascots of interfaith dialogue.
Conclusion: Masonic Theater in Monastic Garb
This pilgrimage follows the Masonic strategy outlined in the “False Fatima Apparitions” file: “Stage 3 (1958-2000): Takeover of the narrative by modernists, concealment of truth, ecumenical reinterpretation.” By exploiting Charbel’s reputation while gutting his Catholic substance, the conciliar sect advances its anti-church agenda. As St. Pius X warned in Lamentabili (Proposition 65): “Contemporary Catholicism cannot be reconciled with true knowledge without transforming it into a certain dogmaless Christianity.” Let true Catholics heed Pius XI’s call to “restore all things in Christ” (Ubi Arcano) by rejecting this sacrilegious pantomime.
Source:
Pope Leo, a pilgrim at the tomb of St. Charbel (vaticannews.va)
Date: 01.12.2025