Vatican News portal (December 24, 2025) presents a retrospective of Christmas messages from post-1958 usurpers of the Apostolic See, framing their modernist deviations as authentic papal teaching. The article attempts to manufacture continuity between Pius XII’s wartime radio address and the blasphemous “Holy Year of Hope” proclaimed by antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost). This synthetic narrative constitutes nothing less than historical revisionism sacralizing the conciliar revolution.
Pius XII’s Compromised Witness Against Nazi Barbarism
The article selectively quotes Pius XII’s 1942 radio message decrying persecution based on “nationality or ancestry,” while omitting his failure to explicitly condemn the Judeocide by name. This diplomatic ambiguity stands condemned by Catholic principles requiring in odium fidei clarity when confronting evil. As Pius XI declared in Mit Brennender Sorge (1937): “None but superficial minds could stumble into concepts of a national God, of a national religion.” The wartime pontiff’s muted response to systematic deicide foreshadowed the conciliar sect’s later doctrinal equivocations.
John XXIII’s Naturalistic Reduction of the Incarnation
The 1958 hospital visit exemplifies the emerging conciliar shift toward horizontalism. By reducing Emmanuel (“God with us”) to a sentimentalized encounter with sick children, Roncalli undermined the mysterium tremendum of the Word Made Flesh. Contrast this with Pius XII’s Mystici Corporis (1943): “The Word of God… assumed a human nature liable to sufferings in order to teach men by His example… but also that He might offer Himself a spotless Victim on the altar of the Cross.” The Incarnation’s sacrificial dimension disappears in John XXIII’s therapeutic Nativity.
Paul VI’s Marxist-Liturgical Syncretism
The 1968 “worker’s Christmas” at Taranto steelworks epitomizes the conciliar betrayal. Montini’s lament – “work and religion… are two separate things” – reveals his modernist presuppositions. Catholic social doctrine had always integrated labor and faith through the principium unitatis of Christ’s Kingship. As Leo XIII taught in Rerum Novarum (1891): “When religion… is removed from the workshop, the Church of Jesus Christ is violently excluded.” Paul VI’s theatrical Mass amid factories normalized the very secularization he pretended to lament.
“Workers, listen to us: Jesus, the Christ, is for you. We speak to you from the heart.”
This demagogic address substitutes proletarian flattery for the Church’s maternal admonitions. Compare with Pius XI’s Quas Primas (1925): “Kings and princes are bound to give public honor to Christ… that they may preserve their authority and promote the prosperity of their country.”
Wojtyła’s Jubilee Syncretism and the Cult of Man
The article celebrates John Paul II’s millennial theatrics without noting their theological vacuity. His cry “You are our hope” directed toward a crucifix inversionally replaces Deus Spes Nostra with anthropocentric messianism. This violates the Council of Trent’s condemnation (Session VI, Canon 13) of those who “assert that man may be justified before God by his own works.” The “open arms” rhetoric extends the post-conciliar program of replacing conversion with inclusion, damnation with dialogue.
Benedict XVI’s Sentimentalized Migrant Christology
Ratzinger’s 2012 Midnight Mass homily exemplifies the conciliar sect’s immigration idolatry. By equating the Holy Family’s divinely-ordained journey with modern migration patterns, he dissolves the scandalum crucis into social work. Pius XII’s Exsul Familia (1952) distinguished true refugees from economic migrants, insisting migration policy must serve the bonum commune rather than globalist agendas. Benedict’s rhetorical question – “Do we have room for God?” – replaces supernatural faith with humanitarian emotivism.
Bergoglio’s Desecration of the Holy Year
The article’s culmination in Francis’ 2024 “Holy Year of Hope” unveils the anti-church’s ultimate apostasy. His call to “bring hope wherever hope has been lost” constitutes a Pelagian negation of redemption through Christ’s Sacrifice alone. This “hope” detached from penance and conversion mocks Pius IX’s Syllabus condemning the proposition that “the Church is unable efficaciously to protect… the salvation of souls” (Error 40). The conciliar sect’s Nativity has become a pagan winter solstice celebration.
Antipope Leo XIV: Lighting Darkness with Newchurch’s False Dawn
The current usurper’s Peruvian Christmas message during the “pandemic” completes this diabolical inversion. When Prevost claims Christmas remains “a feast of light on earth” amid global tyranny, he apes the ancient serpent’s promise: “You will not die” (Genesis 3:4). Contrast this with Pius XI’s Quas Primas: “When once men recognize… that Christ is King… society will at last receive the great blessings of real liberty, well-ordered discipline, peace and harmony.”
The Vatican News retrospective constitutes a sacrilegious parody of the Church’s Magisterium. From Pacelli’s diplomatic ambiguities to Prevost’s therapeutic blasphemies, the conciliar sect has systematically replaced the Regnum Christi with humanitarian psychodrama. As the Holy Office decreed in Lamentabili (1907): “Truth changes with man, because it develops with him, in him, and through him” (Error 58). This evolutionary dogma underlies every Christmas message emitted from occupied Rome since 1958. Only by rejecting the conciliar anti-church can Catholics truly adore the newborn King in spirit and truth.
Source:
Christmas, ‘sorrowing humanity,’ and the voice of the popes (vaticannews.va)
Date: 24.12.2025