VaticanNews.va (January 8, 2026) reports on antipope Leo XIV’s homily during an “Extraordinary Consistory” of “cardinals,” focusing on themes of “synodality,” “fraternal love,” and “listening.” The modernist gathering discussed implementing the apostate program of Evangelii gaudium – Bergoglio’s manifesto replacing evangelization with humanistic dialogue. The antipope framed this blasphemous parody of ecclesial governance as a “prophetic gesture” for our “frenetic world,” urging his collaborators to avoid “personal or collective agendas” while distributing “five loaves and two fishes” to humanity struggling with “existential emptiness.”
Subversion of Ecclesiastical Authority Through Masonic “Collegiality”
The very premise of this consistorium constitutes rebellion against the monarchia pontificalis (pontifical monarchy) defined by Boniface VIII’s Unam Sanctam: “Outside of this Church there is neither salvation nor remission of sins…the spiritual power has to establish the earthly power, and to judge it if it be not good.” Pius VI’s condemnation of the Jansenist Synod of Pistoia (1794) explicitly forbids such false collegiality: “The authority of the Roman Pontiff…cannot be subjected to any secular power, nor even to the ecumenical council.” By reducing the Sacred College to a democratic “community of faith” rather than acknowledging it as an extension of papal sovereignty, antipope Leo XIV enacts the conciliar revolution’s core heresy – the false equality of bishops proclaimed in Vatican II’s Lumen Gentium.
“Our College…is not called, first of all, to be a team of experts, but a community of faith…the greatest fruit.”
This perversion directly contradicts Pius X’s Vehementer Nos (1906): “The Church is essentially an unequal society. It comprises two categories of persons: the Pastors and the flock…The one duty of the multitude is to allow themselves to be led…to follow their Pastors.” The article’s emphasis on “sharing their burden of pastoral care” reveals the neo-church’s fundamental error: replacing the hierarchical mediation of grace with horizontal human solidarity.
Naturalism Replacing Supernatural Faith
Nowhere does antipope Leo XIV mention the munera triplex (threefold office) of teaching, sanctifying, and governing – the essential duties of shepherds entrusted with souls. Instead, the gathering obsesses over sociological management of the “great crowd” suffering “existential emptiness.” This reduction of religion to therapeutic humanism fulfills Pius X’s warning in Pascendi Dominici Gregis (1907): “For the Modernists, both as author and finisher, faith is fed and grows…not by perpetual adoration of Truth revealed, but by internal experience and religious sentiment.”
The antipope’s call to become “a voice for all those whom the Lord has entrusted to their pastoral concern” inverts the Church’s mission. As Pius XI declared in Quas Primas (1925): “When once men recognize, both in private and in public life, that Christ is King, society will at last receive the great blessings of real liberty, well-ordered discipline, peace and harmony.” The consistory’s focus on distributing material “loaves and fishes” while ignoring the Sacrificium Novum (New Sacrifice) confirms the neo-church’s apostasy from its Eucharistic foundations.
Symptomatic Silence on Doctrinal Apostasy
The article’s complete omission of doctrine, conversion, or eternal salvation exposes the conciliar sect’s true nature. When antipope Leo XIV references “the multifaceted beauty of the Church,” he parrots the modernist relativism condemned in Pius IX’s Syllabus of Errors (1864): “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization.” (Error #80).
The blasphemous invocation of St. Leo the Great – defender of Christ’s divinity against the monophysite heresy – to promote this humanitarian agenda constitutes spiritual theft. True Catholic shepherds would echo Leo I’s words to Flavian: “Without detriment therefore to the properties of either nature…the lowliness of the manhood was absorbed into magnificence.” Instead, antipope Leo XIV reduces the Church’s mission to feeding the naked and hungry – a materialist distortion echoing Marx’s critique of religion.
Ritual Parody Confirming the Desolation
The sacrilegious “Mass” celebrated by antipope Leo XIV and his false cardinals cannot be the Sacrificium Crucis (Sacrifice of the Cross) as defined by Trent (Session XXII), since they lack valid orders and orthodox intent. This masonic gathering fulfills Our Lady of La Salette’s prophecy: “Rome will lose the faith and become the seat of the Antichrist.” The very structure of the “consistory” – with its emphasis on dialogue and discernment – apes the 1782 Wilhelmsbad Masonic Congress where Illuminati plotted the French Revolution’s anti-clerical pogroms.
As St. Pius V warned in Quo Primum (1570): “Let all everywhere adopt and observe what has been handed down by the Holy Roman Church…nothing whatsoever is to be added, omitted, or altered.” The neo-church’s rejection of this immutable principle confirms its status as the “abomination of desolation” (Matt 24:15) foretold in Scripture. Only return to the integral Catholic faith professed before 1958 can end this diabolical disorientation.
Source:
Pope at Mass: Consistory a time for Cardinals to reflect on Church’s path (vaticannews.va)
Date: 08.01.2026