The Vatican News portal (January 9, 2026) reports on antipope Leo XIV’s address to the Diplomatic Corps, lamenting the “spreading zeal for war” while advocating multilateralism, humanitarian law, and “dialogue” as solutions to global conflicts. The usurper of Peter’s throne claims war “gravely threatens the rule of law,” cites Augustine selectively, and demands peace through “humility” divorced from Christ’s Kingship. This modernist manifesto reduces the Church’s mission to NGO-style activism, betraying its divine mandate by omitting the Social Reign of Christ the King.
Reduction of Peace to Naturalistic Humanism
The address commits theological treason by framing peace as a merely earthly construct. When antipope Leo XIV states “peace is increasingly sought through force rather than justice”, he perverts justice into relativistic “dialogue” rather than iustitia in Deo (justice in God). Pius XI’s Quas Primas condemns this naturalism: “The hope of lasting peace will not shine upon nations as long as individuals and states renounce the reign of our Savior” (n.1). The omission of Christ’s Kingship in discussing international order constitutes apostasy from Catholic doctrine that “all power in heaven and on earth has been given to [Christ]” (Matthew 28:18).
False Ecumenism Masquerading as Human Rights
Antipope Leo XIV’s appeal for religious freedom as “the first of all human rights” (attributed to Benedict XVI) contradicts the Syllabus of Errors: “Every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which… he shall consider true” is condemned as error n.15. The 1907 decree Lamentabili Sane anathematizes the notion that “Revelation was merely man’s self-awareness of his relationship to God” (n.20) – the foundation of this false rights framework. By commemorating Nostra Aetate’s sixtieth anniversary, the conciliar sect legitimizes religious indifferentism condemned by Pius IX: “The Church cannot establish limits to the progress of natural and theological sciences” (Syllabus, error n.57).
Undermining Church Authority Through UN Idolatry
The antipope’s praise for the United Nations as “a centre of multilateral cooperation” constitutes blasphemous substitution of divine authority with Masonic globalism. Pius XI’s Quas Primas explicitly rejects such naturalism: “Rulers of states must fulfill their duty to Christ the King… if they wish to maintain authority inviolate” (n.32). The 1864 Syllabus condemns as error n.39 the claim that “The State… is endowed with a certain right not circumscribed by any limits.” By seeking peace through worldly institutions rather than conversion to Catholicism, antipope Leo XIV fulfills Pius IX’s warning against those who “equate the Church with false religions” (Syllabus, error n.21).
Theological Contradictions in Humanitarian Posturing
While feigning concern for migrants and prisoners, the address ignores the primary spiritual catastrophe: souls damned through modernist heresies. The claim that “every migrant is a person with inalienable rights” omits the Church’s teaching that rights derive from duties to God (Pius XII, Summi Pontificatus). The call to abolish the death penalty directly contradicts Scripture (Genesis 9:6, Romans 13:4) and canon law (1917 CIC 1024). When antipope Leo XIV states “prisoners can never be reduced to the crimes they committed”, he rejects the Church’s distinction between sinner and sin – essential for justice and redemption.
Semantic Subversion of Catholic Language
The address weaponizes language against truth, lamenting “a new Orwellian-style language which… ends up excluding those who do not conform” while practicing this very deception. The term “dialogue” replaces conversion as the ecclesial mission, violating Christ’s command “make disciples of all nations” (Matthew 28:19). By condemning “exclusion” of LGBT activists, antipope Leo XIV implements the modernist heresy condemned in Lamentabili Sane n.65: “Contemporary Catholicism cannot be reconciled with true knowledge without transforming into… liberal Protestantism.”
Omission of Supernatural Realities
The complete silence about hell, sin, sacraments, and the Four Last Things reduces the Church’s mission to social work. Pius X’s Pascendi Dominici Gregis identifies this naturalism as the essence of Modernism: “Religious sentiment… is the explanation of everything” (n.14). While quoting Augustine on peace, antipope Leo XIV ignores the Doctor of Grace’s teaching that “true peace is only in the Heavenly City” (De Civitate Dei XIX.17). The refusal to demand nations’ submission to Christ the King constitutes implicit denial of “the universal rights of God over human societies” (Pius XI, Quas Primas n.18).
Antipope Leo XIV’s address completes the conciliar revolution’s betrayal: replacing the Social Kingship of Christ with UN multilateralism, divine law with humanitarian rhetoric, and conversion with dialogue. As Pius IX warned in Quanta Cura, such errors arise when men “usurp the chief authority in the Church” while rejecting her divine constitution. Only return to integral Catholic doctrine before 1958 can restore true peace – pax Christi in regno Christi (the peace of Christ in the kingdom of Christ).
Source:
Pope raises alarm over human rights and a spreading “zeal for war” (vaticannews.va)
Date: 09.01.2026