Neo-Church’s “Charity” Exposes Its Denial of Supernatural Grace
The Catholic News Agency portal (January 20, 2026) reports on “Pope” Leo XIV’s message for the 34th World Day of the Sick, urging the faithful to “rediscover the beauty of charity” through social compassion modeled on the Good Samaritan. The article emphasizes concrete actions for the suffering while omitting any reference to sanctifying grace, the sacraments, or the soul’s salvation. This reduction of Christian charity to mere humanitarianism epitomizes the conciliar sect’s apostasy from Catholic truth.
The Naturalization of Supernaturally Infused Virtue
Leo XIV’s message declares: “Love is not passive; it goes out to meet the other” and frames charity as “a force that leads to real service.” This corrupts the Catholic understanding of caritas — the theological virtue “infused by God into the souls of the faithful to make them capable of acting as His children and of meriting eternal life” (Catechism of St. Pius X). By divorcing charity from sanctifying grace, the antipope reduces it to a naturalistic impulse. Pius XI condemned this error, teaching that true charity “flows from the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus Christ” and requires union with God through prayer and the sacraments (Caritate Christi Compulsi, 1932).
The message’s claim that “the social dimension of compassion” constitutes authentic Christian love directly contradicts Pope Pius XI’s warning against those who “pervert the very idea of charity and undermine its very nature” by focusing exclusively on temporal relief while ignoring the salvation of souls (Quadragesimo Anno, 1931). Nowhere does Leo XIV mention that spiritual works of mercy — instructing the ignorant, praying for the living and dead — take precedence over corporal works, as taught by the Council of Trent (Session XIV).
Omission of the Necessary Means of Salvation
The article highlights Leo XIV’s appeal for “concrete gestures” toward the sick but remains silent on the sacramental economy. This omission exposes the neo-church’s abandonment of Catholic soteriology. St. Alphonsus Liguori teaches: “The sacrament of Extreme Unction is so necessary that without it… salvation would be morally impossible for the sick” (The Sacrament of Extreme Unction, 1756). The pre-conciliar Roman Ritual mandated that priests bring Viaticum to the dying “without any delay” as “the most necessary preparation for the final journey.”
By contrast, Leo XIV promotes a purely horizontal compassion detached from the Church’s raison d’être: “For there is no other name under heaven given to men, whereby we must be saved” (Acts 4:12). Pius XII condemned this modernistic inversion: “There are some who neglect the fact that the primacy of the spiritual is required… by the very Author of salvation” (Summi Pontificatus, 1939).
Relativizing Divine Law Through False Ecumenism
The message’s emphasis on becoming “a neighbor” regardless of creed advances the conciliar heresy of universal brotherhood. Leo XIV quotes Bergoglio’s Fratelli Tutti — a document declaring all religions “worthy of honor and respect” (§279) — thereby endorsing its denial of the Social Kingship of Christ. Pius IX anathematized this position: “They are in error who assert that all religions are more or less good and praiseworthy” (Quanta Cura, 1864, §3). The Good Samaritan parable cannot justify indifferentism, since Christ concludes: “Go, and do thou likewise” (Luke 10:37) — commanding adherence to Divine Law, not relativizing it.
Illegitimate Authority Cannot Preach Virtue
The article presents Leo XIV as a valid teacher despite his manifest heresies. St. Robert Bellarmine’s De Romano Pontifice states: “A manifestly heretical pope automatically ceases to be pope” (II.30). Having publicly affirmed that “God wills the diversity of religions” (Bahrain interfaith meeting, 2022), the antipope lacks jurisdiction to preach on Christian charity. Pius V’s bull Regnans in Excelsis (1570) declares that heretics “by authority itself… are deprived of every power and dignity.”
The World Day of the Sick itself — instituted by the modernist WojtyÅ‚a — exemplifies the neo-church’s psychologization of religion. Traditional Catholicism observes the Commendation of the Dying ritual and the Last Rites, not therapeutic “awareness days.” As St. Augustine teaches: “What does love look like? It has hands to help others, feet to hasten to the poor, eyes to see misery, ears to hear sighs” — but only when grounded in the “love of God poured forth in our hearts by the Holy Ghost” (Romans 5:5).
Omission of the Cross as Source of Redemptive Suffering
Nowhere does the message mention uniting sufferings with Christ’s Passion — the heart of Catholic sickbed spirituality. St. Louis de Montfort’s Letter to the Friends of the Cross states: “You must suffer as Christians… in union with Jesus Christ crucified.” Pius XII’s Mystici Corporis (1943) teaches that the sick “are united with the sufferings of Christ for the building up of the Church” (§22). By reducing illness to a problem of social compassion, the conciliar sect denies “the fellowship of His sufferings” (Philippians 3:10).
The article’s closing invocation to Mary as “Health of the Sick” perverts her true role as Mediatrix of Graces. Traditional litanies honor her as “Help of Christians” and “Refuge of Sinners” — titles emphasizing supernatural aid, not medical cure. As the Raccolta prayers attest, authentic Marian devotion always seeks “the grace of final perseverance” through her intercession, not mere physical healing.
Source:
Pope Leo XIV urges faithful to rediscover the beauty of charity (catholicnewsagency.com)
Date: 20.01.2026