Vatican News portal (January 24, 2026) reports that antipope Leo XIV’s message for the 60th World Day of Social Communications emphasizes “protecting human dignity” in digital communication while framing artificial intelligence as an “anthropological challenge” requiring “responsibility, cooperation and education.” The text warns that AI risks “altering essential dimensions of human communication” and calls for technological development to “serve the human person rather than replacing or diminishing human dignity.” The message concludes with vague appeals for “renewed care for face and voice” to preserve “the human dimension of communication.”
Naturalism Disguised as Human Dignity
The document’s repeated references to “human dignity” and “authentic relationships” constitute a modernist sleight-of-hand, substituting natural virtue for supernatural order. Pius XI’s Quas Primas (1925) explicitly taught that “nations will be happy only when they accept the reign of Our Savior with willing minds,” establishing Christ’s Social Kingship as the sole foundation for human dignity. By reducing communication ethics to anthropocentric concerns, the conciliar sect continues its systematic erasure of the Rex Regum from social discourse – precisely fulfilling Pius IX’s condemnation in the Syllabus of Errors (1864) that “the Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (Error 80).
Pope Leo highlights the difficulty of distinguishing between reality and simulation in digital environments…
This technological anxiety reveals deeper doctrinal bankruptcy. Where St. Pius X’s Lamentabili Sane (1907) condemned the proposition that “truth changes with man, because it develops with him, in him, and through him” (Error 58), the current message accepts the post-conciliar premise that human nature requires protection from technology rather than recognizing technology as a symptom of humanity’s fallen state. The true crisis lies not in algorithms but in the conciliar sect’s refusal to proclaim technology’s subjection to the Eternal Law, as mandated by Leo XIII’s Immortale Dei: “States cannot without crime behave as if God did not exist.”
Omission of Sacramental Reality
Nowhere does the document mention the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass – the source of all authentic communication between God and man. This silence proves the message’s theological nullity, for as the Council of Trent decreed: “Through the Mass, that clean oblation is offered which alone can propitiate God’s wrath” (Session 22, Chapter 2). The pseudo-pontiff’s concern for “media literacy” becomes diabolical inversion when divorced from lex orandi, reducing salvation history to digital ethics workshops.
The message’s call for “collaboration among institutions” constitutes ecclesiastical suicide when “institutions” include governments persecuting true Catholics. Pius IX’s Quanta Cura (1864) anathematized those who claim “the best condition of human society is that wherein no duty is acknowledged by the Government of restraining offenders” (Error 3). Yet this document implicitly endorses pluralistic governance by avoiding any reference to the Duty of States to Restrain Heretics – a cornerstone of Catholic statecraft from Theodosius to St. Louis IX.
Gnostic Anthropology Replaces Divine Order
Antipope Leo’s reduction of human identity to “face and voice” exposes the conciliar sect’s gnostic anthropology. Contrast this with Pius XII’s Mystici Corporis (1943): “In the Holy Eucharist, faithful are nourished and grow at the same table, and in a divine way are brought into union with each other and with the Divine Head.” The true foundation of human dignity lies not in biological traits but in sanctifying grace – systematically dismissed by neo-modernists who reduce man to his material components.
Education in media, information, and artificial intelligence literacy… fostering critical awareness
This pedagogical proposal constitutes apostasy when divorced from doctrina christiana. The 1917 Code of Canon Law (Canon 1373) mandated Catholic schools teach “nothing contrary to faith or morals,” requiring theology professors to swear the Anti-Modernist Oath. The current message’s secularized “education” mirrors the condemned 1907 proposition: “The Church is an enemy of the progress of natural and theological sciences” (Lamentabili Sane, Error 57), inverting truth by implying progress occurs outside Sedes Sapientiae.
No Warning Against Spiritual Dangers
The document’s silence on three critical issues exposes its diabolical disorientation:
1. No mention of the demonic manipulation possible through AI-generated blasphemies (deepfake Marian apparitions, simulated sacraments)
2. No condemnation of transhumanism seeking digital immortality – a satanic parody of resurrection
3. No call for repentance from technocrats developing AI systems that track Traditional Catholics
Moreover, the message’s appeal to “common good” rings hollow from an institution that allows communion for public adulterers. As St. Augustine warned: “Without justice, what are kingdoms but great robberies?” The conciliar sect’s embrace of UN Sustainable Development Goals – which include abortion access and gender ideology – renders its technological ethics a Trojan horse for globalist depopulation agendas.
Conclusion: A Call to Reject Technocratic Idolatry
True Catholics must recognize this message as another brick in the neo-church’s Babylon – a naturalist prison where “human dignity” means radical autonomy from God’s Law. Against this, we proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King, commanding the destruction of all technologies opposing divine law as per Deuteronomy 7:5: “Destroy their altars, break their statues, cut down their groves.” Let us smash the AI idols being erected in Vatican II’s temple and restore the Only Necessary Communication: The Holy Mass, where Verbum caro factum est – not “data made algorithm.”
Source:
Pope Leo: Technology must serve the human person, not replace it (vaticannews.va)
Date: 24.01.2026