The VaticanNews portal (January 25, 2026) reports on an Angelus address by “Pope” Leo XIV (Robert Prevost), wherein he claims Christ’s public ministry began amidst “unfavourable circumstances” after John the Baptist’s arrest. The antipope asserts this demonstrates God works in “every time” regardless of conditions, urging listeners to “proclaim the Gospel in every context of human life” as a “leaven of fraternity and peace among all individuals, cultures, religions and peoples.” This represents a complete inversion of the Gospel’s supernatural purpose into a vehicle for naturalistic universalism.
Naturalistic Reduction of Divine Mission
The assertion that Christ chose Capernaum because it was a “multicultural region” (“traversed by people of diverse origins and religious affiliations”) constitutes theological malpractice. Scripture specifies Christ dwelt there “that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Isaias the prophet: Land of Zabulon and land of Nephthalim… the people that sat in darkness, hath seen great light” (Matthew 4:14-16). The divine intent centered on fulfilling Messianic prophecy – not embracing cultural pluralism. Leo XIV’s omission of this prophetic dimension exposes his modernist hermeneutic, reducing Scripture to sociological commentary rather than revelation.
“He is a God who excludes no one… enters fully into the complexity of human situations.”
This statement embodies the conciliar sect’s fundamental heresy condemned by Pius IX: “Everyone is free to embrace and profess that religion which, guided by the light of reason, he shall consider true” (Syllabus of Errors, #15). The true Christ explicitly excludes the unrepentant: “He that believeth not shall be condemned” (Mark 16:16). The counterfeit “god” proclaimed here bears no resemblance to the “Lord of lords and King of kings” (Revelation 17:14) who demands submission to His absolute reign.
Erasure of Repentance and Judgment
Nowhere does Leo XIV mention Christ’s inaugural command: “Do penance, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand” (Matthew 4:17). This deliberate omission continues Bergoglio’s pattern of suppressing the sine qua non of salvation – contrition for sin. Pius XII condemned such pastoral negligence: “The sin of the century is the loss of the sense of sin” (Radio Message, 1946). By transforming the Gospel into a message of indiscriminate inclusion, the Vatican apparatus fulfills Pius X’s warning about Modernists making religion “a mere sentiment” (Pascendi Dominici Gregis, 6).
False Ecumenism as Antichurch Dogma
The injunction to bring “fraternity and peace among all… religions” constitutes formal apostasy from Catholic soteriology. Leo XIII established infallibly: “It is quite unlawful to employ… arguments in defense of dogmas which have the analogy of nature and reason… [or] to accept any opinion contrary to any point of divine revelation” (Providentissimus Deus, 91). This call for interreligious “fraternity” directly violates the Oath Against Modernism: “I entirely reject the heretical misrepresentation that dogmas evolve… and that they may be reconciled with science” (Sacrorum Antistitum, 1910).
Gnostic Reinterpretation of Divine Providence
The claim that “every moment is ‘God’s time'” irrespective of circumstances perverts the Catholic understanding of kairos. True missionary activity requires discernment of “opportune time” (2 Timothy 4:2) through prayer and obedience – not Bergoglian improvisation. Pius XI defined authentic evangelization as establishing “the reign of our Lord… over individuals, families, and states” through submission to Christ the King (Quas Primas, 33). The “new evangelization” peddled by Vatican occupiers replaces conquest of nations with surrender to secularism.
Conclusion: Apostasy Wrapped in Christian Vocabulary
This Angelus exemplifies the conciliar sect’s modus operandi: using traditional Christian terminology to propagate anti-Christian doctrines. By divorcing evangelization from repentance, judgment, and exclusive salvation through the Church, Leo XIV continues the destruction wrought by his predecessors. As the Holy Office decreed under Pius X: “The magisterium of the Church… was established by God to guard and interpret revealed truth. Hence nobody is permitted to interpret Scripture contrary to this sense” (Lamentabili Sane, #4). Those still attending Novus Ordo services participate in this subversion each time they hear such homilies.
Source:
Pope at Angelus: Trust God’s timing, bring the Gospel everywhere (vaticannews.va)
Date: 25.01.2026