Vatican News portal (January 26, 2026) reports on a meeting between antipope Leo XIV and Barham Salih, UN High Commissioner for Refugees, framing the conciliar sect as a “partner” in refugee assistance while promoting UN-led humanitarianism as the solution to global displacement. The article celebrates “interfaith philanthropy” and “inclusive policies” for refugees while omitting any reference to the Church’s supernatural mission. This represents yet another surrender of Catholic principles to naturalistic globalism.
Naturalism Displaces Supernatural Charity
The article’s exclusive focus on material assistance reveals the conciliar sect’s abandonment of caritas (supernatural charity) in favor of humanitarian activism. When Salih states that refugees “deserve dignity” through “access to legal services and financial services,” he reduces human dignity to socioeconomic factors, directly contradicting Pius XI’s teaching that “the peace of Christ can only be achieved in the Kingdom of Christ” (Quas Primas, 1925). The UN official’s appeal to “our collective humanity” substitutes Enlightenment natural law for the Catholic truth that “there is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12).
“We emphasize the need for our partnership with the Church and with faith-based organizations as we try to deliver on our mandate of helping refugees worldwide.”
This statement exposes the conciliar sect’s complicity in the UN’s secular agenda. The Second Council of Lyons (1274) and Boniface VIII’s Unam Sanctam (1302) declared the Church’s supremacy over temporal powers, yet here the counterfeit Vatican positions itself as a subordinate NGO “partner.” Pius IX condemned this inversion in the Syllabus of Errors, rejecting the notion that “the Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church” (Proposition 55).
Omission of Christ’s Kingship
Not once does the article mention Christ the King or the duty of nations to submit to His social reign. The term “refugee” appears 14 times, while “Jesus Christ” is conspicuously absent – a telling silence that fulfills Pius X’s warning about modernists who “put aside Christ” (Pascendi Dominici Gregis, 18). The conciliar sect’s “inclusive policies” for refugees directly oppose Pius XI’s condemnation of religious indifferentism in Mortalium Animos (1928), which forbade collaboration that “places false religions on the same footing with the true religion.”
“My hope is that we can also work far more with other faith organizations and work on this interfaith philanthropy that can come together to speak to the core values of our faith…”
This call for interfaith collaboration constitutes formal heresy against the extra ecclesiam nulla salus dogma defined at the Fourth Lateran Council (1215). The article’s celebration of “interfaith philanthropy” echoes the condemned proposition that “Protestantism is nothing more than another form of the same true Christian religion” (Pius IX, Syllabus, Proposition 18).
Structural Apostasy in Refugee Policy
The article’s proposed “durable solutions” of integrating refugees into secular host nations constitutes a denial of the Church’s exclusive right to guide nations. When Salih praises Kenya and Chad for “allowing [refugees] into their national system,” he promotes the heresy condemned by Pius IX that “the State, as being the origin and source of all rights, is endowed with a certain right not circumscribed by any limits” (Syllabus, Proposition 39). Nowhere does the conciliar sect demand that host nations recognize Christ as King or establish Catholicism as the state religion – the only true solution to societal disorder.
The monetary focus (“shrinking humanitarian space, and limited resources”) reduces the Church’s mission to material concerns, violating Pius XI’s warning against “those who neglect and hold of no account the things of heaven and eternity” (Divini Redemptoris, 18). Antipope Leo XIV’s collaboration with the UN – an organization promoting abortion and population control – constitutes formal cooperation with evil condemned by the Council of Trent (Session 22).
Symptomatic of Conciliar Revolution
This refugee policy exemplifies the conciliar sect’s wholesale adoption of modernist errors. The article’s vocabulary of “protection,” “human rights,” and “dignity” parrots UN documents rather than Catholic social teaching. Its silence on the salvation of souls proves Benedict XV’s warning that modernists “pervert the eternal concept of truth” (Ad Beatissimi Apostolorum, 3). By positioning the counterfeit Vatican as a UN subsidiary, antipope Leo XIV fulfills St. Pius X’s description of modernists who “want the Church to ally itself with democracy” and “resign itself to these vagrant opinions” (Pascendi, 26).
The true Church continues its uninterrupted mission through validly ordained priests who offer the Traditional Latin Mass and preach the integral faith. As Pius XII declared, “The Church has no use for conditional or half-hearted Catholics” (Mystici Corporis, 70). Those clinging to conciliar structures participate in what St. Augustine called “magna quaedam seditio” – a great rebellion against Christ the King.
Source:
UN High Commissioner for Refugees: Church important partner in helping refugees (vaticannews.va)
Date: 26.01.2026