The EWTN News portal (January 22, 2026) reports that antipope Leo XIV, through his false “Secretary of State” Pietro Parolin, addressed the French Catholic media federation. The message urges journalists to focus on “relationships,” “reconciliation,” and amplifying voices of the “vulnerable” amid AI’s rise. It praises the late Fr. Jacques Hamel—murdered by Islamic terrorists in 2016—as a model of “dialogue” and “mutual listening,” while urging media to act as “antennas” for marginalized voices. This revolutionary propaganda masquerades as pastoral care, omitting all reference to Christus Rex and the Church’s divine mission.
Naturalism Replaces Supernatural Faith in “Antichurch” Directive
The message’s core demand—that Catholic media prioritize “matters of the heart” and “good relationships”—constitutes a fundamental betrayal of the Church’s evangelizing mission. Pius XI’s Quas Primas (1925) unequivocally declares: “When once men recognize, both in private and in public life, that Christ is King, society will at last receive the great blessings of real liberty, well-ordered discipline, peace and harmony” (§19). By reducing communication to horizontal human interaction, the Vatican occupiers discard the munus docendi of the Magisterium, instead embracing the naturalist heresy condemned in Pius IX’s Syllabus of Errors: “Human reason, without any reference whatsoever to God, is the sole arbiter of truth and falsehood” (Error 3).
This directive deliberately avoids:
- Any mention of converting souls or combating doctrinal errors (contrary to Canon 1325 §1).
- The necessity of upholding dogmatic truth against modernist distortions (Pius X, Lamentabili Sane, Proposition 22).
- Christ’s command: “Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost” (Matthew 28:19).
False Martyrdom and Syncretism in the Hamel Example
The glorification of Fr. Jacques Hamel as a “witness to the faith” exemplifies the conciliar sect’s corruption of martyrdom. True martyrdom requires death in odium fidei (out of hatred for the Faith)—not mere violence during liturgical rites. As St. Thomas Aquinas teaches: “The martyr’s death involves the shedding of one’s blood for Christ’s sake, or for some Christian truth” (Summa Theologica II-II, q.124, a.5). Hamel’s killers targeted him as a cultural symbol of France, not as a defender of Catholic doctrine against Islamic errors—errors his own interfaith “dialogue” never challenged.
Moreover, the award named after Hamel for “peace and interreligious dialogue” directly contradicts Pius XI’s condemnation: “That false statement which is called ‘Interconfessionalism’ is based on the supposition that all religions are more or less good… All adherents of all religions… equally able to gain eternal salvation” (Mortalium Animos, 1928). By promoting this syncretic narrative, the antipapal regime advances the Masonic ideal of religious indifferentism explicitly anathematized in the Syllabus (Errors 15-18).
AI as Pretext to Abandon Dogmatic Clarity
The appeal to artificial intelligence as justification for “return[ing] to what matters most” reveals the Modernist tactic of using technological change to relativize immutable truth. St. Pius X exposed this maneuver: “The Modernists… lay down the general principle that in a living religion everything is subject to change, and must in fact be changed” (Pascendi Dominici Gregis, §26). While the means of communication evolve, the Church’s message remains unchanging: “Jesus Christ, yesterday, and today; and the same for ever” (Hebrews 13:8).
The call to amplify “voices of the vulnerable” absent doctrinal discernment inevitably leads to promoting anti-Catholic agendas. Consider:
“the experiences of the vulnerable, the marginalized, those who are alone—and those who need to discover the joy of feeling loved.”
This emotionalist language deliberately avoids specifying which moral conditions make one “vulnerable.” Will media now platform LGBT activists, divorced/remarried persons, or abortion advocates under this rubric? The 1917 Code of Canon Law (Canon 1399) explicitly forbids giving publicity to writings that endanger faith or morals—a principle the conciliar sect has systematically dismantled.
Conclusion: Apostolic Authority Versus Revolutionary Noise
True Catholic journalism—exemplified by organs like La Civiltà Cattolica under Pius XII—served as “aids to the Magisterium in making known the truth and refuting error” (Pius XII, Miranda Prorsus, 1957). By contrast, the occupiers of the Vatican reduce media to a social work agency, discarding the sensus fidei for humanitarian platitudes. Leo XIV’s message proves the conciliar sect’s final evolution into a purely natural institution, fulfilling St. Pius X’s warning: “They wish the Church to… be more tolerant… not only of error… [but] to show indulgence to all opinions” (Pascendi, §39). The only proper response remains that of St. Paul: “But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema” (Galatians 1:8).
Source:
Pope Leo XIV to French Catholic media: Keep the heart of communication in an age of AI (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 22.01.2026