Vatican Labor Dispute Exposes Apostate Hierarchy’s Naturalism
EWTN News (January 23, 2026) reports on the Holy See’s dismissal of claims regarding worker discontent following an internal survey by the Association of Vatican Lay Employees (ADLV). Monsignor Marco Sprizzi, president of the Office of Labor of the Apostolic See (ULSA), asserts that “discontent is not widespread,” despite survey findings alleging managerial distrust and workplace harassment. The conciliar sect’s labor office insists it maintains “constructive and frequent” dialogue while implementing new statutes approved by antipope Leo XIV.
Naturalism Replaces Catholic Labor Doctrine
The dispute centers on material grievances—salaries, harassment protocols, and management transparency—while wholly omitting the supernatural purpose of labor. Sprizzi cites antipope Leo XIV’s daycare centers and disability accommodations as achievements, reducing the Church’s mission to secular humanitarianism. This directly violates Pope Leo XIII’s encyclical Rerum Novarum (1891), which rooted workers’ rights in eternal law:
“Rights must be religiously respected wherever they are found; and it is the duty of the public authority to prevent and punish injury.” (RN §33)
By contrast, ULSA’s focus on “dialogue” and “constructive solutions” echoes Freemasonic conflict resolution models, prioritizing institutional harmony over justice. Sprizzi’s orchestra metaphor (“each instrument must contribute to harmony”) reveals a collectivist mindset alien to Catholicism’s hierarchical vision.
Suppression of Truth Through Bureaucratic Obfuscation
Sprizzi dismisses the ADLV survey—representing 250 employees—as statistically insignificant, claiming awareness of no harassment cases. Yet his admission that “even a single complaint must be taken seriously” contradicts his earlier minimization. This doublespeak mirrors the conciliar sect’s systemic suppressio veri (suppression of truth), condemned by Pius X in Pascendi Dominici Gregis:
“They make the whole of religion rest… on religious sense… so that there is nothing stable, nothing solid in the Church.” (§6)
The ULSA president’s appeal to “rumors vs. verification” ignores canonical procedures for investigating abuses (1917 CIC cc. 1933-1941). By suggesting antipope Leo XIV would “intervene first” in harassment cases, Sprizzi replaces juridical order with personality cult dynamics.
Reduction of Church Mission to Naturalistic Humanism
ULSA’s new statutes allegedly promote labor rights “in line with the Church’s social teaching.” Yet Sprizzi’s sole reference to Magisterium—Rerum Novarum—is weaponized to legitimize bureaucratic appeasement. Missing entirely is Pius XI’s condemnation of naturalistic labor movements in Quadragesimo Anno:
“No genuine cure can be furnished for this lamentable ruin of souls, which… has led so large a section of mankind to reject Christianity, except by restoring Christian life.” (§135)
The conciliar administrators boast about pandemic-era job security but ignore the true crisis: the near-total disappearance of sacramental life in Vatican offices. No mention is made of ensuring Mass access, confession availability, or spiritual direction—the actual remedies for workplace discord.
Ecclesial Communism Masquerading as “Dialogue”
Sprizzi’s claim that Vatican employees share a “common mission” rings hollow when the ULSA itself operates under antipope Leo XIV—a usurper promoting heresies like universal salvation and religious indifferentism. The ADLV’s demands for wage equity and anti-harassment protocols mirror Marxist class struggle, rejecting Pius XI’s warning in Divini Redemptoris:
“Communism is intrinsically perverse, and no one who would save Christian civilization may collaborate with it in any way whatsoever.” (§58)
The conciliar sect’s labor relations model—technocratic working groups, vague “dialogue”—embodies the modernist heresy of ecclesial democratization. Contrast this with true Catholic social order: bishops governing authoritatively while ensuring just wages (1917 CIC c. 1524) and dignified conditions.
Conclusion: Apostate Structure Incapable of Justice
This labor dispute exposes the conciliar sect as a bureaucratic entity, not the Mystical Body of Christ. When Sprizzi cites Gospel and “social magisterium” while ignoring the Kingship of Christ (Pius XI, Quas Primas), he confirms Vatican II’s betrayal of Catholic integralism. The absence of references to sin, grace, or final judgment in ULSA’s policies proves these administrators worship not God but human resource management. As Our Lord warned: “Every plant which my heavenly Father has not planted will be uprooted” (Matthew 15:13).
Source:
Vatican rejects claims of widespread worker discontent after internal survey (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 23.01.2026