Senate’s Neglect of Pregnant Students Exposes Modernist Indifference to Life
EWTN News reports on the failure of the U.S. Senate to pass the Pregnant Students’ Rights Act, which would have mandated colleges to inform pregnant students about resources to carry pregnancies to term. Concurrently, it details Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s lawsuit against Debra Lynch of Her Safe Harbor for mailing abortion drugs into Texas, allegedly used in a poisoning incident resulting in fetal death.
Naturalistic Reduction of Maternal Support
The article frames the stalled bill as a mere informational measure about “rights” and “resources,” omitting any reference to the moral obligation to protect life grounded in divine law. This reflects the conciliar sect’s embrace of secular humanism, reducing the Church’s mission to social services rather than sanctification. As Pius XI declared in Quas Primas, civil authorities must recognize Christ’s reign by aligning laws with His commandments—including the absolute prohibition of abortion (“Thou shalt not kill”). The bill’s failure underscores a society that, having ejected God from public life, now refuses even minimal support for motherhood.
Kristan Hawkins’ statement—“No student should have to choose between her child and her education”—implicitly accepts the false dichotomy of career versus motherhood, a modernist distortion alien to Catholic teaching. The Church affirms motherhood as the highest vocation for women (Pius XII, Allocution to Italian Mothers, 1941), yet the article reduces pregnancy to a logistical challenge solvable by campus accommodations.
Legalistic Substitution for Moral Clarity
Paxton’s lawsuit against abortion pill distributors is presented as a pro-life victory, but the article’s focus on “illegal drugs” and criminal penalties sidesteps the intrinsic evil of abortion. Nowhere does it cite the Church’s infallible condemnation of abortion as murder (Council of Trent, Session XXIV; Pius XI, Casti Connubii). By reducing the issue to legal technicalities (“alleged poisoning”), the report adopts the naturalistic language of secular jurisprudence, ignoring the eternal consequences for souls involved in abortion.
The attorney general’s declaration—“No one… will be freely allowed to aid in the murder of unborn children”—echoes Catholic truth but lacks doctrinal precision. True justice demands not only punitive action but public repentance and reparation, as required by Canon 2350 §1 of the 1917 Code, which excommunicates those procuring abortion.
Omissions Revealing Apostasy
Silence pervades the article on critical points:
– No mention of sacramental support for pregnant students (e.g., access to Confession to absolve abortion-related guilt).
– No call for colleges to promote chastity, as taught by Pius XI’s Divini Illius Magistri (1929), which condemns coeducation for fostering impurity.
– No warning that receiving “services” from institutions that also provide contraception or abortion referrals constitutes cooperation with evil.
The conciliar sect’s obsession with “rights” language—“discrimination complaint based on pregnancy”—further betrays its capitulation to feminist ideology. Contrast this with Leo XIII’s Rerum Novarum (§14), which upholds the family’s primacy over the state and rejects the notion that women require state intervention to fulfill their God-given roles.
The Masonic Roots of Abortion Advocacy
Paxton’s legal battles against abortion pill traffickers inadvertently expose the Masonic underpinnings of the abortion industry. The Syllabus of Errors (1864) condemned Freemasonry’s pursuit of religious indifferentism (§77), which manifests today in the “choice” rhetoric enabling abortion. Her Safe Harbor’s cross-state pill trafficking exemplifies the universal revolution Pius IX warned against—a coordinated assault on life and family by secret societies.
Yet the article ignores this historical context, treating abortion as isolated criminal acts rather than systemic apostasy. As the False Fatima Apparitions file notes, Masonic operations often co-opt seemingly pious causes to advance relativism. Here, the stalled pro-life bill becomes a tool to normalize the conciliar sect’s inaction against abortion.
Conclusion: A Call for Integral Catholic Action
True Catholics must reject both the Senate’s neglect and the conciliar sect’s timid advocacy. As the Defense of Sedevacantism file affirms, no authority contradicting divine law can claim legitimacy. Let us demand not merely informational pamphlets for pregnant students, but the restoration of Christus Rex over education—banning abortion collaborators from campuses, mandating daily Rosaries, and expelling professors who deny fetal personhood. Only then will justice prevail.
Source:
Bill to inform pregnant college students about their rights and resources stalls in Senate (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 31.01.2026