Neo-Church’s Migrant Narrative Exposes Apostate Priorities
Portal CNA reports that antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) declared on November 4, 2025: “I would certainly invite the authorities to allow pastoral workers to attend to the needs of those people” detained in U.S. immigration facilities. The article details how Auxiliary “Bishop” José María García-Maldonado attempted to bring “Communion” to detainees at Broadview facility, claiming they endure “inhumane” conditions including “sleeping on floors” and denied medications. Antipope Leo invoked Matthew 25 to justify this activism: “Jesus is very clearly, at the end of the world, we’re going to be asked, ‘How did you receive the foreigner?’” This modernist exploitation of Christ’s words to promote borderless globalism exemplifies the conciliar sect’s rejection of Catholic social order.
Naturalistic Reduction of Christ’s Doctrine
The antipope’s selective citation of Matthew 25 omits Christ’s precondition: “For I was hungry, and you gave me to eat… you did it to one of these my least brethren” (Matthew 25:40). The Church has always understood “my brethren” as the baptized faithful, not ideological constructs of global migration. Pius XI’s Quas Primas (1925) condemns this distortion: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states… the entire human society had to be shaken” (n. 18). By divorcing charity from truth, the neo-church reduces Christianity to humanitarian activism – precisely the “naturalism” condemned in Pius IX’s Syllabus of Errors (1864) as error #63: “It is lawful to refuse obedience to legitimate princes.”
Sacrilegious Simulation of Sacraments
The claim that García-Maldonado sought to “bring holy Communion to detainees” constitutes blasphemy for three reasons:
1. The Novus Ordo “Mass” invalidly confects the Eucharist per Lamentabili Sane (1907), which condemns sacraments as “merely modes of explanation” (n. 54)
2. The detainees’ baptismal status remains unverified – a grave violation of Canon 731 §2 (1917 CIC)
3. The conciliar sect’s “pastoral workers” lack valid orders, rendering their “Communion” mere bread.
Pius XII’s Mediator Dei (1947) warns: “No one… may arbitrarily set aside the liturgical laws” (n. 58). This sacramental theater serves political ends, not souls.
Omission of Migrants’ Spiritual Duties
Nowhere does the article mention migrants’ obligation to obey host nations’ laws or convert to Catholicism. This violates Pius IX’s condemnation of religious indifferentism: “Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation” (Syllabus, error #15). The true Church teaches asylum seekers must “submit to the governing authorities” (Romans 13:1) while nations retain the right to “prevent foreigners from governing the people” (Leo XIII, Immortale Dei, 1885). The conciliar sect’s silence on these truths exposes its Marxist inversion of morality.
Subversion of National Sovereignty
By decrying “inhumane” conditions while ignoring detainees’ illegal entry, the neo-church advances the UN’s border abolition agenda. St. Robert Bellarmine’s De Laicis (1586) establishes: “Kings have the power to exclude foreigners… as may be conducive to the public good” (Ch. VI). Antipope Leo’s demand for “pastoral workers” access mimics Masonic tactics condemned in Humanum Genus (1884): “To penetrate into the heart of states… under pretext of public utility” (n. 20). This is revolution disguised as religion.
Perverted Hierarchy of Values
The article prioritizes temporal comfort over eternal salvation. While decrying “sleeping on floors,” it ignores whether detainees receive valid sacraments or know Catholic doctrine. Compare this to Pius X’s Vehementer Nos (1906): “It is necessary that the State should everywhere place the law of God… as foundation of its laws” (n. 3). The conciliar sect’s inversion fulfills Pius X’s warning about Modernists: “They presume to subordinate the authority of the Church… to civil authority” (Pascendi, 1907, n. 6).
Conclusion: Apostasy Disguised as Compassion
This migrant narrative epitomizes the neo-church’s apostasy. By reducing Matthew 25 to social work, invalidating sacraments, and rejecting Catholic states’ rights, antipope Leo proves himself “the man of sin… who opposeth and is lifted up above all that is called God” (2 Thess 2:3-4). As the true Church teaches in Quas Primas: “Nations will be reminded by the annual celebration of this feast that not only private individuals but also rulers and princes are bound to give public honor and obedience to Christ” (n. 32). Until nations bow to Christ the King, such crises will multiply.
Source:
Pope Leo XIV says spiritual needs of detained migrants deserve attention (catholicnewsagency.com)
Article date: 04.11.2025