Vatican News portal reports on an audience granted by antipope Leo XIV (Prevost) to the organizing committee of the “From Crisis to Care: Catholic Action for Children” initiative (February 5, 2026). The text frames children’s welfare through the lens of secular human rights discourse rather than Catholic doctrine, exemplifying the conciliar sect’s abandonment of supernatural priorities.
Human Rights as Substitute for Divine Law
The initiative’s stated goal of ensuring “every child grows up in safe, nurturing family care” employs the naturalistic language of UN sustainable development goals rather than the Church’s eternal teaching on the regnum sociale Christi (social kingship of Christ). Pius XI’s Quas Primas (1925) established that peace comes only when “individuals and states renounce and do not wish to recognize the reign of our Savior.” Yet the article substitutes this with bureaucratic appeals to “strong, coherent systems,” ignoring that no temporal structure can replace the societas perfecta (perfect society) of the Church.
Antipope Leo’s lament that children lack “access to the basic necessities of life” focuses exclusively on material poverty while omitting spiritual destitution. The true crisis lies not in inadequate social programs but in the mass apostasy enabled by conciliar churchmen who’ve abandoned Pius X’s condemnation of modernism in Lamentabili Sane (1907). When antipope Francis’ quoted message speaks of “cleans[ing] the world of bad things,” it parodies exorcism rites while denying the reality of sin requiring sacramental purification.
Family Subversion Through False Rights Language
The article’s claim that antipope Leo “reaffirmed the importance of the family” constitutes theological fraud. While quoting his statement about a child’s “right to receive love from a mother and a father,” the text ignores how conciliar authorities have systematically undermined parental rights through:
“Working directly with children and families across five continents”
This globalist framework violates Pius IX’s condemnation in the Syllabus of Errors (1864) that “The State, as being the origin and source of all rights, is endowed with a certain right not circumscribed by any limits” (Error #39). By positioning church structures as partners with secular agencies in family matters, the initiative enacts the condemned proposition that “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church” (Error #55).
Omission of Supernatural Realities
Nowhere does the text mention children’s need for baptism, catechesis, or protection from heresy – the sine qua non of Catholic charity. The “physical, psychological, and spiritual welfare” triad deceives by equating natural well-being with supernatural salvation. Compare this to Pius XII’s actual teaching: “The family… has the duty… to protect the children against religious indifference” (Mystici Corporis, 1943). The initiative’s silence on preventing children from receiving invalid sacraments in conciliar rites constitutes pastoral malpractice.
The article’s concluding prayer – “We ask the Lord’s blessings upon all of you, and we remember in prayer especially children” – embodies the empty ritualism of those who’ve lost the faith. True Catholic prayer for children begins with the ex opere operato (by the work performed) efficacy of sacraments, not the conciliar sect’s anthropocentric activism. When antipope Leo speaks of children’s “God-given potential,” he reduces imago Dei (image of God) to human development metrics rather than sanctifying grace.
Structural Apostasy in Conciliar Methods
The involvement of the “Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors” exposes this initiative’s rotten foundations. This disgraced body has never addressed the root cause of abuse: the infiltration of modernist clergy who reject the priestly character defined in Sacramentum Ordinis (1947). True Catholic action would mandate:
- Rejection of the new mass rite that obscures the propitiatory sacrifice
- Restoration of clerical discipline per Vetitum Sodaliciorum (1917 Code of Canon Law)
- Repudiation of the false ecumenism enabling predator transfer between denominations
Instead, the committee partners with “religious unions” and “lay experts” – classic modernism’s elevation of experience over dogma. The call for “greater harmony and collaboration” between church structures constitutes the condemned error that “The Church is incapable of effectively defending evangelical ethics” (Lamentabili Sane, Error #63).
As St. Pius X warned: “The Modernist sustains and comprises within himself many personalities; he is a philosopher, a believer, a theologian, a critic, an apologist, a reformer” (Pascendi, 19). This initiative perfectly embodies that diabolical synthesis – using children’s suffering as emotional leverage to advance globalist governance under Antichurch auspices.
Source:
Pope reiterates need to respect rights of children, protect them from danger (vaticannews.va)
Date: 05.02.2026