Conciliar Sect Complicit in Canada’s Culture of Death
The EWTN News portal (February 7, 2026) reports that the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops (CCCB) endorsed Bill C-218, which seeks to prohibit euthanasia for individuals with mental illness as their sole condition, while Conservative MP Garnett Genuis introduced Bill C-260 to criminalize state coercion in MAiD discussions. The CCCB statement selectively cites U.N. disability-rights concerns but avoids categorical condemnation of euthanasia as intrinsically evil, thereby aiding the normalization of state-sanctioned murder.
Naturalism Replaces Supernatural Faith
The conciliar sect’s statement reduces the Church’s mission to humanitarian activism, framing opposition to MAiD through secular arguments about mental illness being “not necessarily irremediable” and U.N. committee recommendations. This omits the de fide teaching that euthanasia constitutes homicide against divine law, regardless of the patient’s condition (Pius XII, Address to Doctors, 1957). The syllabus of errors condemned the proposition that “human reason… is the sole arbiter of truth and falsehood” (Pius IX, Syllabus, §3), yet the CCCB subordinates eternal truths to psychiatric pragmatism.
Coercion as Symptom of Apostate Governance
Genuis’ Bill C-260 acknowledges systemic coercion but fails to address the theological root: Canada’s embrace of MAiD flows from rejecting Christ’s kingship over civil law. Pius XI’s Quas Primas (1925) declared that rulers must “publicly honor Christ” lest society collapse into “injustice, discord, and peace.” By collaborating with parliamentarians to “improve safeguards,” the CCCB legitimizes a regime that institutionalizes murder as healthcare—a betrayal of Quas Primas‘ mandate to restore social kingship of Christ.
Silence on Sacramental Reality
No mention is made of the eternal consequences for souls involved in euthanasia: patients risk dying in mortal sin, while facilitators become cooperators in evil. The CCCB’s call for “free conscience voting” ignores the Church’s infallible condemnation of religious liberty as “insanity” (Gregory XVI, Mirari Vos, §14). True shepherds would demand excommunication for legislators supporting MAiD, not parliamentary tweaks.
Modernist Language Exposes Doctrinal Bankruptcy
Bureaucratic phrases like “constructive step” and “profound moral implications” mask apostasy. Contrast this with St. Pius X’s Lamentabili Sane (1907), which condemned the claim that “dogmas… are not truths of divine origin” (§22). By treating euthanasia as a policy issue rather than defiance of God’s authority, the CCCB confirms its alignment with the conciliar sect’s naturalistic revolution.
Conclusion: False Shepherds Enable Slaughter
The Canadian bishops’ refusal to condemn MAiD in principle—coupled with their appeal to U.N. committees—exposes their membership in the counter-church. As Pius XI taught, “When God and Jesus Christ are removed from laws… the foundations of authority are destroyed” (Quas Primas). Until Canada submits to Christ the King, all “safeguards” are demonic deceptions—and the CCCB’s complicity damns souls.
Source:
Canadian Catholic bishops join members of Parliament in push to restrict medical aid in dying (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 07.02.2026