Apostolic Journey or Apostasy? Bergoglian Heir Plans Monaco Summit Amidst Denial of Christ’s Social Kingship
Vatican News portal reports (February 10, 2026) that antipope Robert Prevost (styling himself “Leo XIV”) is considering a one-day visit to Monaco in late March. This would follow his prior journeys to Turkey and Lebanon, with expressed desires to travel to Algeria for “dialogue” with Muslims and to Latin America. The article highlights discussions with Prince Albert II of Monaco, focusing on environmentalism, humanitarianism, and undefined “human dignity,” framed within the context of “good bilateral relations” between the Vatican occupiers and Monaco’s secular principality.
Naturalism as Substitute for Supernatural Mission
The proposed visit epitomizes the conciliar sect’s reduction of the Church’s mission to a humanitarian NGO. Quas Primas (Pius XI, 1925) establishes that Christ’s Kingship extends to “individuals, families, and states”, demanding their public submission to His reign. Yet Monaco’s ruling dynasty receives no call to recognize Christ as King, nor does the article mention Monaco’s legalized abortion, divorce, and other moral abominations. Instead, the “dialogue” centers on ecological concerns and material aid—priorities condemned by Pius IX’s Syllabus of Errors (1864), which rejects the notion that “the Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself with progress, liberalism, and modern civilization” (Error 80).
Religious Indifferentism Disguised as Peacebuilding
Prevost’s desire for Algerian “dialogue” with Muslims continues the conciliar betrayal. Pius XI’s Mortalium Animos (1928) forbids Catholics from participating in interreligious gatherings that imply all faiths are equally valid: “The Catholic Church alone is keeping the true worship… To favor such opinions, therefore, and to encourage such undertakings is tantamount to abandoning the religion revealed by God.” By seeking common ground with Islam—a heresy denying Christ’s divinity—the Vatican occupiers commit apostasy. The silence on converting non-Catholics reveals a church that no longer believes in the extra Ecclesiam nulla salus dogma defined at the Council of Florence.
Illegitimacy of the Usurper’s “Apostolic Journeys”
Prevost’s claim to the papacy is null under Canon 188 §4 of the 1917 Code, which voids the office of any cleric who “publicly defects from the Catholic faith.” His predecessors—beginning with Roncalli (“John XXIII”)—promulgated heresies like religious liberty (Dignitatis Humanae), condemned by Gregory XVI’s Mirari Vos (1832) as “insanity”. St. Robert Bellarmine’s De Romano Pontifice affirms that manifest heretics automatically lose office without declaration. Thus, Prevost’s travels lack any apostolic authority, serving instead to normalize the conciliar sect’s false ecumenism.
Omission of Monaco’s Moral Bankruptcy
Nowhere does the article address Monaco’s legalized vices—abortion, contraception, fornication—which Pius XI’s Casti Connubii (1930) identifies as societal suicide. True pastors would denounce these evils and demand Monaco’s conversion, as St. Remigius did with Clovis: “Adore what you burned, burn what you adored.” Instead, the usurper’s diplomats discuss “humanitarian assistance,” ignoring that no society can achieve justice without Christ the King.
The Silent Schism: When “Unity” Means Apostasy
The meeting with Prince Albert II exemplifies the conciliar sect’s heresy of collegiality, which undermines the Church’s monarchical constitution. Vatican I’s Pastor Aeternus declares that the Pope possesses “full and supreme power of jurisdiction over the whole Church”—a power Prevost lacks. By treating Monaco’s ruler as an equal partner in governing “social life,” the occupiers deny the Church’s divine right to command civil leaders. This fulfills Error 55 of the Syllabus: “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church.”
Source:
Pope Leo XIV may visit Principality of Monaco (vaticannews.va)
Date: 10.02.2026