Conciliar Sect’s Zionist Compromise Exposes Apostasy at Religious Liberty Hearing
EWTN News reports (February 10, 2026) on a heated exchange at the Trump administration’s Religious Liberty Commission, where panelist Carrie Prejean Boller claimed Catholics reject Zionism based on faith. The article reveals the conciliar sect’s attempt to reconcile Catholic doctrine with Jewish nationalism through ambiguous statements from Nostra Aetate and compromised “clerics,” exposing its fundamental betrayal of Christ’s Social Kingship.
Theological Anarchy Masquerading as Dialogue
The reported debate centers on Boller’s flawed assertion that “Catholics don’t embrace Zionism” while commission members cited the heretical Vatican II document Nostra Aetate to defend Jewish nationalism. Ryan Anderson invoked this conciliar text falsely claiming: “What happened in his passion cannot be charged against all the Jews… nor against the Jews of today.” This directly contradicts the dogmatic teaching of Pope Innocent III at the Fourth Lateran Council: “The Jews, by their own guilt, are consigned to perpetual servitude because they crucified the Lord” (Canon 69).
The conciliar sect’s advisor, “Father” Thomas Ferguson, compounded heresy by declaring: “He’s not dead. He’s alive, he is risen… It’s all of us [responsible for Christ’s death].” This modernist equivocation denies the deicide clearly imputed to Jerusalem’s leaders in Acts 2:23 and 1 Thessalonians 2:15 – truths upheld by Pope Pius XII in Mystici Corporis (1943) as requiring “serious theological consideration.”
“Catholics who affirm Israel’s right to exist and to self-determination… are, in essence, affirming that same principle [Zionism]”
Simone Rizkallah’s defense of Zionism as compatible with Catholicism demonstrates the conciliar sect’s abandonment of extra Ecclesiam nulla salus. Her claim that “the Church recognizes Israel’s fundamental right to exist” as a nation-state constitutes apostasy against Christ’s exclusive reign: “All power is given to me in heaven and in earth” (Matthew 28:18). Pius XI’s Quas Primas (1925) dogmatically declares: “Nations will be happy and prosperous only when they accept Christ’s law, respect His Church, and submit to His reign.”
Naturalism Replaces Supernatural Faith
The entire premise of the “Religious Liberty Commission” embodies the condemned error of religious indifferentism. The article’s focus on “antisemitism” as the primary concern ignores the supreme crime of rejecting Christ’s divinity – the root Jewish unbelief that blinds them to their Messiah. Pius IX’s Syllabus of Errors (1864) condemns as heresy the notion that: “Every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which, guided by the light of reason, he shall consider true” (Proposition 15).
Rabbi Ari Berman’s demand that Catholics accept Zionist claims exposes the conciliar sect’s surrender to Talmudic pressures. His assertion that “anti-Zionism is antisemitism” inverts moral reality – true Catholics must oppose all nationalist movements rejecting Christ’s universal kingship. St. Pius X warned in Lamentabili Sane (1907) against those who “overstep the boundaries set by the Fathers… under the guise of more serious criticism” (Proposition 1), precisely the modernist tactic used here to justify Zionism.
Symptomatic of Conciliar Apostasy
This spectacle reveals three terminal cancers in the conciliar sect:
- Sacramental Invalidity: “Father” Ferguson’s priesthood is suspect given post-1968 ordination rites. His blasphemous denial of Jewish deicide proves he lacks Catholic sensus.
- Doctrinal Bankruptcy: The appeal to Nostra Aetate (1965) – a non-dogmatic Vatican II document – as authoritative demonstrates the sect’s rejection of immutable dogma.
- Masonic Alliance: The Commission’s framework of “religious liberty” directly implements condemned Freemasonic principles denounced in Leo XIII’s Humanum Genus (1884).
While Boller correctly rejects Zionist heresies, her failure to ground opposition in Catholic integralism renders her position incoherent. True Catholics condemn Zionism not as “antisemitic” but as anti-Christ – a rebellion against the Social Reign of Christ the King mandated by Quas Primas. The conciliar sect’s desperate attempts to placate both Zionists and “traditionalists” confirm its status as the “abomination of desolation standing in the holy place” (Matthew 24:15). Until Rome returns to professing Christus Vincit, Christus Regnat, Christus Imperat, such blasphemous dialogues will only multiply.
Source:
Anti‑Zionism claim by Catholic panelist prompts sharp exchange at Religious Liberty Commission (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 10.02.2026