The Pillar Catholic portal (February 14, 2026) promotes a podcast episode titled “Bonus: Scatology and Eschatology” featuring JD Flynn and Ed. Condon. The title alone reveals the naturalistic and irreverent spirit of the post-conciliar sect: it reduces the supernatural realities of the last things (eschatology) and the integrity of the human person (scatology) to the level of crude, biological commentary, utterly divorced from the Catholic sense of the sacred, the redemptive value of suffering, and the absolute primacy of the soul’s salvation. This framing is not a harmless rhetorical device but a symptom of the theological bankruptcy that defines the Novus Ordo religion, where divine mysteries are discussed in the same casual, often vulgar, register as bodily functions, reflecting the modernist principle that all things, including Revelation, must be “updated” into immanent, humanistic categories.
The Naturalistic Reduction of Supernatural Truths
The very coupling of “scatology” (the study of excrement) with “eschatology” (the study of the last things) is a profound theological error. It implicitly equates the physical, transient, and often shameful reality of bodily waste with the eternal, glorious, and terrifying realities of death, judgment, heaven, and hell. This is a classic Modernist tactic, condemned by St. Pius X in Lamentabili sane exitu: it treats sacred doctrines as mere “modes of explanation” and “stages in the evolution of Christian consciousness” (Proposition 54), subject to the same casual, even crude, discussion as any natural science. The Catholic Church, before the revolution, taught that the body, while good, is destined for corruption (Genesis 3:19), and its functions are to be governed by modesty and the virtue of temperance. To place discussions of the Sacraments, grace, and the Four Last Things on the same plane as discussions of excretion is to strip the supernatural of its transcendence and to profane the sacred. It is the logical outcome of the “hermeneutics of continuity” which pretends to be “Catholic” while emptying Catholic terms of their supernatural meaning and refilling them with naturalistic, often psychological, content.
The Omission of the True Catholic Eschaton
The term “eschatology” in the conciliar sect’s discourse is a shell. It almost never refers to the concrete, terrifying, and glorious realities defined by the Church: the particular judgment immediately after death (Heb. 9:27), the threefold state of the Church (militant, suffering, triumphant), the resurrection of the body, the final judgment (Matt. 25:31-46), and the eternity of heaven and hell. Instead, it is reduced to social concerns, “signs of the times” interpreted through the lens of modern politics, or vague spiritual feelings. This omission is damning. Pope Pius XI, in Quas Primas, established the Feast of Christ the King precisely to combat the secularism that “denied Christ the Lord’s reign over all nations” and to remind rulers and states of “the final judgment, in which Christ… will very severely avenge these insults.” The conciliar sect, by contrast, speaks of “dialogue,” “encounter,” and “accompaniment,” while remaining silent on the absolute necessity of the Catholic faith for salvation (Dogma of Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus) and the terrifying reality of eternal damnation for those who die in mortal sin or in false religions. The “eschatology” of Flynn and Condon is a bloodless, modernized version that serves the “abomination of desolation” standing in the holy place—the false church that has replaced the Catholic Church.
The Profanation of the Human Person and the Body
The invocation of “scatology” is not merely a poor choice of words; it is a manifestation of the conciliar sect’s descent into the profane. Catholic theology, as expressed by St. Thomas Aquinas, holds that the body and its functions, while natural, are to be governed by reason and faith, and their disordered discussion is a sin against the virtue of modesty. The modern approach, inherited from the sexual revolution and embraced by the post-conciliar hierarchy, is to “demystify” everything by reducing it to biology and psychology. This is a direct assault on the Catholic understanding of the human person as a substantia composita—a unity of soul and body, both destined for either glory or damnation. The body is not a biological machine to be discussed crassly; it is a temple of the Holy Ghost (1 Cor. 6:19), to be treated with reverence. The casual, even humorous, pairing with “eschatology” demonstrates that the modern “Catholic” mind no longer perceives the profound connection between the body’s integrity, the call to purity, and the soul’s eternal destiny. It is the spirit of the world, not the Spirit of God, that finds humor in such juxtapositions.
The Heretical Context of the Speakers
JD Flynn and Ed. Condon are prominent figures within the conciliar sect’s media apparatus. Their very platform, “The Pillar Catholic,” is an oxymoron. They operate within and fully recognize the legitimacy of the “paramasonic structure” occupying the Vatican, from John XXIII through the current usurper, “Pope” Leo XIV (Robert Prevost). They accept the false ecumenism, religious liberty, and collegiality of Vatican II—all doctrines condemned by the pre-1958 Magisterium. Therefore, their discussion of any Catholic topic, even if it uses traditional vocabulary, proceeds from a foundation of apostasy. They are like the “false apostles” of whom St. Paul warned (2 Cor. 11:13-15), transforming themselves into “apostles of Christ.” Their analysis cannot be Catholic because their ecclesiology is not Catholic. They acknowledge a man who publicly and notoriously holds heretical propositions (on the death penalty, the death of souls in Hell, the non-exclusivity of the Catholic Church, etc.) as the Vicar of Christ. According to St. Robert Bellarmine and Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code, such a manifest heretic has ipso facto lost the papacy. To recognize him is to be in schism from the true Church. Thus, Flynn and Condon’s entire enterprise is a work of deception, making the conciliar revolution palatable to those who have an emotional attachment to Catholic trappings but have rejected Catholic doctrine.
The Systematic Omission of the Social Kingship of Christ
The most glaring omission in any modern “Catholic” discussion of eschatology is the doctrine so clearly taught by Pius XI in Quas Primas: the social reign of Christ the King. The Pope taught that “the Kingdom of our Redeemer encompasses all men” and that “states… have the duty to publicly honor Christ and obey Him.” He condemned the secularism that “removed Jesus Christ and His most holy law from… public life” as the cause of societal decay. The conciliar sect, following the errors of the Syllabus of Errors (especially propositions 39, 77, 80), has embraced the separation of Church and State and religious liberty. Therefore, its members cannot preach the social kingship of Christ without contradicting the foundational principles of the sect they serve. Flynn and Condon’s podcast, by its very title’s focus on the individual and the biological, implicitly rejects the Catholic social order. They discuss “scatology” (a private, bodily matter) and a privatized “eschatology,” while remaining utterly silent on how Christ must reign in constitutions, laws, schools, and economies. This silence is a denial of the Faith as taught by all pre-1958 Pontiffs.
Conclusion: The Spirit of the Antichrist
The title “Scatology and Eschatology” is a perfect microcosm of the post-conciliar apostasy. It takes the highest mysteries of faith and drags them into the mire of the natural and the mundane. It is a form of sacrilege—the profane treatment of sacred things. The true Catholic eschatology is a doctrine of terror and hope, centered on the mysterium fidei of the Sacrifice of the Mass, the Particular Judgment, and the eternal consequences of our actions. The true Catholic anthropology teaches that the body, redeemed by Christ, is to be kept chaste and pure as a member of Christ. The conciliar sect, by contrast, has made its peace with the world, the flesh, and the devil. Its “theology” is a dialogue with the modern age, a reduction of the supernatural to the psychological, and a desecration of all that is holy. The only appropriate response to such content is total rejection and a return to the immutable Tradition of the Catholic Church, which endures outside the walls of the conciliar Babylon, in the faithful who hold the Faith of Pius IX, Pius X, and Pius XI.
Source:
Bonus: Scatology and eschatology (pillarcatholic.com)
Date: 14.02.2026