---

The Apostasy of “Papal” Diplomacy: Christ the King Excluded from International Relations

The Vatican News portal reports on a routine diplomatic audience: the head of the post-conciliar sect, “Pope Leo XIV,” received the President of Hungary, Tamás Sulyok. The statement from the “Holy See Press Office” emphasizes “solid bilateral relations,” the “contribution that the Catholic Church makes to the life of the country in various social areas,” and “the central role of the family.” The discourse culminates in a generic hope for “an ever greater commitment to the promotion of peace” in conflict zones. This sterile exchange, devoid of supernatural reference, epitomizes the complete theological and spiritual bankruptcy of the conciliar revolution, which has replaced the immutable mission of the Church—the salvation of souls through the exclusive reign of Christ the King—with a naturalistic, humanistic project of social engineering and interfaith dialogue.

Factual Deconstruction: The Usurper’s Diplomacy

The article presents “Pope Leo XIV” as the legitimate Vicar of Christ. From the perspective of integral Catholic faith, this is a categorical falsehood. The line of post-Conciliar popes, beginning with the arch-heretic Angelo Roncalli (“John XXIII”), constitutes a line of public, manifest heretics. As St. Robert Bellarmine definitively taught, a manifest heretic ipso facto ceases to be Pope: “A manifest heretic… by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head, just as he ceases to be a Christian and member of the body of the Church.” The 1917 Code of Canon Law (Canon 188.4) confirms that any cleric who “publicly defects from the Catholic faith” automatically loses all ecclesiastical office. The “Pope Leo XIV” (Robert Prevost), like his predecessors, publicly embraces the errors of Modernism condemned by St. Pius X in Lamentabili sane exitu and Pascendi Dominici gregis—notably the evolution of dogma, religious liberty, and ecumenism. Therefore, his audiences, his “magisterium,” and his entire public ministry are null and void. He is a private individual, an apostate, occupying the Vatican but utterly lacking jurisdiction or authority.

Linguistic Analysis: The Language of Naturalism and Apostasy

The vocabulary of the Vatican statement is a textbook case of Modernist, naturalistic rhetoric:

• “Solid bilateral relations“: Reduces the Church to a mere diplomatic actor among nations, a “non-governmental organization” (NGO) as Bergoglio (“Francis”) openly stated. This directly contradicts the Syllabus of Errors of Pius IX, which condemns the notion that the Church is “not a true and perfect society, entirely free… endowed with proper and perpetual rights of her own” (Error 19). The Church’s rights are divine, not negotiated with secular powers.
• “The contribution that the Catholic Church makes to the life of the country in various social areas“: This language of “contribution” and “social areas” is the language of the abomination of desolation. It silences the Church’s primary role: the preaching of the Gospel for the salvation of souls and the establishment of the social reign of Christ the King. Pius XI’s encyclical Quas Primas, instituting the feast of Christ the King, explicitly links the peace and order of states to their public recognition of Christ’s royal authority: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states… the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” The conciliar sect speaks only of temporal “contribution,” not of the obligation of states to recognize Christ’s law.
• “The central role of the family“: While the natural family is indeed central, this phrase, in the mouth of the post-conciliar hierarchy, is a cynical code for a naturalistic, demographic agenda divorced from the supernatural purpose of the family as a “domestic Church” and a nursery for vocations to the priesthood and religious life. It omits any reference to the family’s duty to form children in the faith, to avoid “perverse” education (Syllabus, Error 48), and to be subordinate to the Church’s authority in matters of faith and morals.
• “Promotion of peace“: This is the hollow, pantheistic peace of the United Nations, not the peace of Christ. Pius XI in Quas Primas states that true peace flows from Christ’s reign: “Then at last… so many wounds can be healed, then there will be hope that the law will regain its former authority, sweet peace will return again, swords and weapons will fall from hands, when all willingly accept the reign of Christ and obey Him.” The conciliar “peace” is a peace without Christ, a peace of mere diplomatic agreements, which Pius IX condemned as stemming from the error that “the civil power… has a right to an indirect negative power over religious affairs” (Syllabus, Error 41).

Theological Confrontation: Omission of the Supernatural as the Gravest Sin

The most damning aspect of the article is not what it says, but what it systematically omits. In a meeting between the self-proclaimed head of the Church and a head of state, there is:

• No mention of Jesus Christ. The name of the Divine Founder, the King of kings, is absent. This is the sin of the “silent apostasy” foretold by St. Pius X. The Church’s entire mission is to “bring forth Christ to all” (Quas Primas). Silence on His name is the mark of the synagogue of Satan (Apoc. 2:9, 3:9) infiltrating the Vatican.
• No mention of the salvation of souls. The “talks” concern “bilateral relations,” “social areas,” and “peace.” The eternal destiny of the Hungarian people—whether they are in the state of grace, whether they are being fed the true doctrine, whether they are warned of the errors of Modernism—is utterly ignored. This is a direct rejection of the Church’s supreme law: “the salvation of souls, which must always be the supreme law in the Church” (1917 Code of Canon Law, Canon 1355). The post-conciliar sect operates on the principle of the “natural good” of society, condemned by Pius IX.
• No mention of the Sacraments. The article speaks of the “Catholic Church’s contribution,” but never of the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, the source and summit. It never mentions the Sacrament of Penance, essential for salvation, or the duty of rulers to publicly profess the Catholic faith. This omission reveals the sect’s true nature: it has replaced the supernatural worship of God with a “meal” and a “community celebration” (as per the Protestantized Novus Ordo).
• No mention of duty, law, or judgment. Pius XI in Quas Primas insists that Christ’s reign implies “a threefold authority”: legislative (“Lawgiver, to whom men owe obedience”), judicial (“the right of the judge to reward and punish”), and executive (“all must obey His commands”). The article’s language of “shared interest” and “dialogue” is the language of equals, not of sovereign and subject. It is the language of Modernist immanentism, where authority flows from “the people” (collegiality) rather than from Christ the King.

Symptomatic Analysis: The Conciliar Revolution’s Synthesis of All Errors

This simple news item is a microcosm of the entire apostasy. It manifests the synthesis of all heresies, as St. Pius X defined Modernism:

1. Naturalism: The discourse is entirely horizontal, between two human powers (the Vatican state and the Hungarian state). There is no vertical reference to God, to grace, to the supernatural order. The Church is presented as one “actor” among many in the “international community.” This is the naturalism condemned in the Syllabus (Errors 1-7) and by Pius X.
2. Indifferentism: By focusing on generic “peace” and “family values” without confessing the exclusive truth of Catholicism, the sect practices practical indifferentism. Pius IX condemned the idea that “man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation” (Syllabus, Error 16). The post-conciliar church, by its silence and its “dialogue,” implies that non-Catholic religions have a role in God’s plan, a direct echo of this error.
3. Ecclesiastical Liberalism: The Church is depicted as a “partner” of the state, not as its superior and the source of its legitimacy. This is the liberal error that the Church should be “separated from the State, and the State from the Church” (Syllabus, Error 55), or that the state has “a right to an indirect negative power over religious affairs” (Error 41). Pius IX excommunicated those who held such views.
4. Evolution of Dogma: The very concept of “papal diplomacy” as practiced today—focused on temporal peace, interreligious encounters, and social issues—is a new doctrine, an evolution from the pre-1958 Catholic doctrine of the social reign of Christ. Pius XI in Quas Primas would have demanded that the Hungarian president publicly recognize Christ as King. Instead, the “Pope” discusses “common interest.” This is the “living tradition” of Modernism, where doctrine “evolves” and “develops” into its opposite.

The True Catholic Response: Christ the King or Chaos

Contrast the apostate silence of the Vatican statement with the thunderous, unequivocal doctrine of Quas Primas:

“If men were ever to recognize Christ’s royal authority over themselves, both privately and publicly, then unheard-of blessings would flow upon the whole society… For what we wrote at the beginning of Our Pontificate about the diminishing authority of law and respect for power, the same can be applied to the present times: ‘When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states… the foundations of that authority were destroyed.'”

The true Catholic faith, held by the remnant in the catacombs, teaches that every state has the obligation to publicly profess the Catholic religion, to enact laws in conformity with the Ten Commandments and the laws of the Church, and to suppress public dissent and false religions. Pius IX’s Syllabus condemns the idea that “it is no longer expedient that the Catholic religion should be held as the only religion of the State” (Error 77). The Hungarian state, therefore, has a grave duty to crown Christ as King in its constitution, laws, and public life. The “dialogue” offered by the usurper in Rome is a diabolical distraction from this absolute, non-negotiable demand.

Furthermore, the “central role of the family” must be understood in its proper, supernatural context: the family is the “domestic Church,” where the father is the priest, prophet, and king of his household, under the authority of the Church. It is the school of sanctity, not a mere biological unit for social stability. The post-conciliar sect’s talk of “family” is a naturalistic, Masonic concept, designed to create a stable society without Christ, a “civilization of love” without grace.

Conclusion: The Abomination Stands Exposed

This article is not a report on a diplomatic meeting. It is a clinical document of apostasy. It reveals a sect that:

1. Operates without a valid pontiff (the See is vacant, occupied by a series of public heretics).
2. Has completely naturalized its mission, reducing the Church to a humanitarian NGO.
3. Has obliterated the supernatural goal of all human activity: the glory of God and the salvation of souls.
4. Practices the indifferentism and ecumenism condemned by Pius IX and St. Pius X.
5. Omits, with criminal consistency, the very name of Jesus Christ and His royal sovereignty over all nations.

The true Catholic, adhering to the faith of all time, must reject this entire spectacle with contempt. He owes no allegiance, no respect, no “dialogue” to the man in the white cassock. He owes total allegiance to Christ the King, whose reign is “not of this world” in its origin (John 18:36) but must be made manifest in its effects in every sphere of human life, from the family to the state. The peace promised by the “Leo XIV” sect is the false peace of the Antichrist. The only peace is that which comes from the public and solemn acknowledgement: Christus Vincit, Christus Regnat, Christus Imperat.

---

Source:
Hungary's President Tamás Sulyok received by Pope Leo XIV   (vaticannews.va)
Date: 21.02.2026