The recent meeting between the self-styled “Pope” Leo XIV and Mary Simon, Governor General of Canada—a state whose legal framework openly sanctions abortion, euthanasia, and the degradation of the natural family—represents not merely routine diplomacy but a profound theological scandal. The official communiqué from the “Holy See” Press Office speaks of “cordial” discussions and “good existing relations,” lauding the “fruits of the path of mutual understanding begun by ‘Pope Francis.’” This language is a studied omission of the supernatural, reducing the Church’s mission to naturalistic international relations while honoring a regime that stands in manifest opposition to the Social Kingship of Christ.
The Omission of Christ’s Kingship: A Denial of Quas Primas
The encyclical Quas Primas of Pius XI (1925) is unequivocal: the primary duty of rulers and states is public veneration and obedience to Christ the King. “Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ, but let them fulfill this duty themselves and with their people, if they wish to maintain their authority inviolate and contribute to the increase of their homeland’s happiness.” The meeting’s silence on this non-negotiable dogma is deafening. There is no mention of Canada’s obligation to enact laws in conformity with God’s commandments, no reminder of the Final Judgment where Christ will avenge the insult of being “cast out of the state.” Instead, the focus is on “commitment to peace among peoples”—a peace devoid of Christ, which Pius XI condemned as “the secularism of our times, so-called laicism.” The “dialogue” praised is the very “ecumenical reinterpretation” and “religious relativism” warned against in the analysis of the Fatima operation, where external threats are prioritized over the internal apostasy of states that have legally expelled God from public life.
The “Mutual Understanding” of Apostasy: An Embrace of Syllabus Errors
The phrase “mutual understanding” is a euphemism for the Church’s surrender to the errors condemned by Pius IX in the Syllabus of Errors. The Canadian state, by its laws, explicitly embodies numerous condemned propositions:
- Error #39: “The State, as being the origin and source of all rights, is endowed with a certain right not circumscribed by any limits.” Canada’s legal positivism, which makes the state the source of “rights” contrary to the natural law, is a direct implementation of this error.
- Error #54: “Kings and princes are not only exempt from the jurisdiction of the Church, but are superior to the Church in deciding questions of jurisdiction.” The Governor General represents a crown that claims complete autonomy from any higher, supernatural jurisdiction.
- Error #77: “In the present day it is no longer expedient that the Catholic religion should be held as the only religion of the State, to the exclusion of all other forms of worship.” The “good relations” praised exist precisely because the “conciliar sect” has abandoned this truth, treating the state’s official promotion of grave moral evil as a legitimate partner.
The meeting’s “appreciation” for these relations is an implicit approval of the state’s apostasy. As the Syllabus states, the Church “has never disobeyed this divine command” to give to God what is God’s and to Caesar what is Caesar’s, but the post-conciliar church has reversed this, giving to Caesar what belongs to God and remaining silent on God’s rights.
The Naturalistic Heresy of “Peace Among Peoples”
The stated topic of “commitment to peace among peoples” is a pure expression of modernism’s “cult of man.” It is a peace sought on purely natural, political grounds, without reference to the only true source of peace: the reign of Christ. Pius XI in Quas Primas taught that peace is impossible without the Kingdom of Christ: “the hope of lasting peace will not yet shine upon nations as long as individuals and states renounce and do not wish to recognize the reign of our Savior.” The article’s focus on this naturalistic peace is a direct contradiction of Catholic doctrine. It is the peace of the world, which is enmity with God (James 4:4), masquerading as a Christian virtue. This is the “synthesis of all errors”—modernism—condemned by St. Pius X in Pascendi Dominici gregis and Lamentabili sane exitu, which seeks to reconcile the Church with the principles of the Revolution.
The Scandal of “Cordial” Relations with an Abortion State
The adjective “cordial” is a theological obscenity. How can relations with a state that has institutionalized the murder of the innocent in the womb be described with a term implying warmth and friendship? This is the language of apostasy. The true Catholic Church would have issued a prophetic condemnation, not a diplomatic smile. The silence on the fundamental right to life—the first right of the person and the foundation of all other rights—exposes the “conciliar sect” as having exchanged the truth of God for the lie of the world (Romans 1:25). The meeting is an act of scandal, giving the impression that the “Church” approves of or is indifferent to Canada’s grave sins, which cry out to heaven for vengeance.
The Usurper’s Legitimacy: A Foundation on Sand
The entire event presupposes the legitimacy of “Pope Leo XIV” (Robert Prevost). From the perspective of integral Catholic faith, this is a fatal error. As demonstrated in the Defense of Sedevacantism source, a manifest heretic loses the papacy ipso facto. The line of usurpers beginning with Angelo Roncalli (“John XXIII”) introduced the heresies of Vatican II, which are condemned by Pius IX’s Syllabus and Pius X’s Lamentabili. The “mutual understanding” praised is the understanding of apostates, a pact with the enemies of Christ. The meeting is therefore not a diplomatic act of the Catholic Church but a political theater staged by the “paramasonic structure” occupying the Vatican, seeking legitimacy from the very powers that have declared war on the Social Reign of Christ.
Conclusion: The Apostasy of the Conciliar Sect
This article is not news; it is a symptom. It reveals the “Church of the New Advent” as a purely natural, political, and humanistic entity. Its highest act of “diplomacy” is to fraternize with powers that have legally enshrined the culture of death, while omitting any call to repentance, any mention of Christ’s exclusive kingship, and any defense of the immutable moral law. The “good relations” are good only for the enemies of the Faith. The “commitment to peace” is a commitment to a world without Christ. This is the logical outcome of the “hermeneutics of continuity” and the “evolution of dogmas” condemned by Pius X. The only legitimate response of a Catholic is to reject this whole conciliar system, to pray for the conversion of its leaders, and to await the day when the true Church, free from the abomination of desolation, can once again proclaim with Pius XI: “Oh, what happiness we would enjoy if individuals, families, and states allowed themselves to be governed by Christ.”
Source:
Pope Leo receives Governor General of Canada (vaticannews.va)
Date: 05.03.2026