Neo-Church’s Construction Site of Apostasy: Bergoglio’s Rome Homery Exposed
VaticanNews portal reports on a homily delivered by antipope Bergoglio (referred to as “Leo XIV”) during a sacrilegious Novus Ordo service at the occupied Lateran Basilica. The article presents Bergoglio’s call for the “construction site” ecclesiology, emphasizing gradual community-building while rejecting “worldly criteria” demanding “immediate results.” Bergoglio invoked Zacchaeus’ conversion narrative to justify modernist incrementalism, claiming Jesus “skillfully shapes us according to his plans for salvation.” The antipope further praised the “implementation phase of the Synod,” urging continued “efforts to grow together” despite acknowledging “complex problems.” The report concludes with Bergoglio’s appeal for liturgy adhering to “established norms” while accommodating “different sensibilities” through “wise inculturation.”
Naturalistic Reduction of Ecclesiology to Human Workshop
Bergoglio’s reduction of the Church to a mere “construction site” constitutes blasphemous rejection of Mystici Corporis Christi (Pius XII, 1943). The One True Church is not human project requiring gradual construction, but the spotless Bride of Christ “against which the gates of hell shall not prevail” (Mt 16:18). By framing ecclesial life as perpetual building process, Bergoglio denies the Church’s divine constitution and perfection bestowed by her Founder. Pius IX’s Syllabus of Errors explicitly condemns such naturalism: “The Church is not a true and perfect society, entirely free…” (Error 19). The Lateran Basilica’s true significance lies not in architectural symbolism but as mater et caput omnium ecclesiarum Urbis et Orbis – the visible seat of Petrine authority now vacated through apostasy.
Systematic Omission of Christ’s Social Kingship
Throughout the homily, Bergoglio avoids any reference to Regnum Christi, despite celebrating the feast of a Papal Archbasilica. This deliberate silence exposes the anti-church’s rebellion against Pius XI’s encyclical Quas Primas establishing Christ’s universal kingship: “When once men recognize, both in private and in public life, that Christ is King, society will at last receive the great blessings of real liberty, well-ordered discipline, peace and harmony.” Bergoglio’s vision of “community building” consciously excludes the Social Reign of Christ the King, instead promoting egalitarian humanism condemned by St. Pius X as “the synthesis of all heresies” (Pascendi, 39). The antipope’s call to overcome “worldly criteria” rings hollow while simultaneously demanding “wise inculturation” – codeword for paganizing Catholic worship.
Sacrilegious Perversion of Liturgical Principles
Bergoglio’s liturgical directives constitute grave violation of Canon Law: “The care for the liturgy… must comply with established norms” while accommodating “different sensibilities” through “wise inculturation.” This doublespeak masks the anti-church’s destruction of Roman Rite, condemned by Pius V’s Quo Primum as inviolable. The mention of “solemn sobriety typical of Roman tradition” is particularly hypocritical coming from the chief promoter of Amazonian Pachamama rites. St. Pius X’s Lamentabili Sane explicitly rejects Bergoglio’s relativism: “Ecclesiastical judgments… prove that Catholic dogmas in no way agree with the real beginnings of the Christian religion” (Error 3). True Roman tradition requires not aesthetic nostalgia but adherence to lex orandi, lex credendi – impossible under Bergoglio’s counterfeit sacraments.
Synodal Process as Vehicle for Doctrinal Corruption
The article reveals the anti-church’s strategic use of “synodal implementation” to advance heresy: “What has matured over years of work now needs to be put to the test.” This incrementalist tactic was foreseen by Pope St. Pius X: “Modernists employ a policy of evolution… that what is immanent may emerge” (Pascendi, 26). Bergoglio’s “uphill journey” metaphor disguises the anti-church’s descent into apostasy, violating the Decretum de fide catholica of Vatican I: “The Holy Spirit was not promised to the successors of Peter to make known new doctrine, but to guard faithfully the deposit of faith.” The Lateran Basilica’s true historical significance lies in hosting five ecumenical councils that defined Catholic dogma against heresies – now desecrated by gatherings plotting doctrine’s overthrow.
Counterfeit Mercy Doctrine in Zacchaeus Narrative
Bergoglio’s misuse of Zacchaeus’ conversion demonstrates modernist corruption of Scripture: “Jesus changes us and calls us to work in God’s great construction site.” This distorts the Gospel’s actual message of immediate restitution (Lk 19:8) into gradualist permissiveness. The Council of Trent anathematizes such distortion: “If anyone says that justifying faith is nothing else than confidence in divine mercy… let him be anathema” (Session VI, Canon 12). Bergoglio’s “encounter theology” replaces sacramental confession with emotional experiences, fulfilling Pius X’s warning about Modernists “corrupting the true sense of biblical texts” (Lamentabili Sane, Error 11). True conversion requires rejection of modern errors, not accommodation as Bergoglio’s “construction site” implies.
Conclusion: Abomination of Desolation in Holy Place
The desecration of Lateran Basilica by antipapal ceremonies manifests the “abomination of desolation standing in the holy place” (Mt 24:15). Catholics must heed Pius XII’s warning: “They who take part in non-Catholic worship are betraying the true Faith and breaking away from the Church” (Instructio de Motione Oecumenica, 1949). The anti-church’s “construction site” builds not Christ’s Kingdom but the “mystery of iniquity” foretold by St. Paul (2 Thes 2:7). Only return to integral Catholic Tradition – not Bergoglio’s synodal revolution – can restore the Church’s visible unity under Christ the King.
Source:
Pope: The Church is a ‘construction site’ for a community to be built without haste (vaticannews.va)
Date: 09.11.2025