The portal Catholic News Agency reports on Leo XIV’s November 9, 2025 homily at St. John Lateran Basilica, wherein he urged building the Church on “solid foundations” of Christ rather than “worldly criteria.” The antipope emphasized humility, patience, and a “construction site” ecclesiology while invoking the Synod’s “concrete efforts” and John Paul II’s description of the Church as “mom.” The liturgy was described as requiring “wise inculturation” while maintaining “solemn sobriety” of Roman tradition. This syncretistic message epitomizes the conciliar sect’s rejection of the Social Kingship of Christ.
Theological Subversion Through Naturalistic Language
The article’s emphasis on “solid foundations” employs a deliberate naturalistic metaphor that obscures regnum Christi (the reign of Christ) as defined by Pius XI: “If princes and magistrates duly elected are filled with the persuasion that they rule, not by their own right, but by the mandate and in the place of the Divine King, they will exercise their authority piously and wisely” (Quas Primas, 19). By reducing ecclesial construction to mere “humility and patience,” the conciliar sect suppresses the Church’s divine constitution as the societas perfecta (perfect society) possessing all juridical powers necessary for man’s supernatural end (Pius IX, Syllabus, Errors 19-21).
Leo XIV’s injunction to “dig deep within ourselves” replaces the Church’s missionary mandate with psychologized interiority condemned by Pius X: “Under the guise of more serious criticism and in the name of historical method, they aim at such a development of dogmas as appears to be their corruption” (Lamentabili Sane, Intro). This echoes Modernist subjectivism condemned as heretical: “Revelation was merely man’s self-awareness of his relationship to God” (Lamentabili, 20).
Syncretism Disguised as Liturgical “Sobriety”
The article’s liturgical directives epitomize the conciliar revolution’s destruction of Catholic worship:
“It must comply with the established norms, be attentive to the different sensibilities… and keep with the principle of wise inculturation… faithful to the solemn sobriety typical of the Roman tradition.”
This doublespeak attempts to syncretize the immemorial Mass with Protestantized ritual condemned by St. Pius V’s Quo Primum. Pius XII explicitly forbade such equivocation: “They are, therefore, forbidden any deviation whatsoever from the formulas of the sacramental… any word, gesture, or rite of their own inclination” (Sacramentum Ordinis, 4).
The invocation of John Paul II’s infantilized “mom” ecclesiology compounds this blasphemy, contradicting Leo XIII’s definition: “The Church is a society chartered as such by the Creator… perfect in its nature and its rights” (Satis Cognitum, 3). By elevating “sensibilities” alongside tradition, the antipope advances the Modernist heresy that “truth changes with man, because it develops with him, in him, and through him” (Lamentabili, 58).
Omission of Christ’s Social Reign as Apostasy
The complete silence regarding Christ’s Kingship over nations constitutes material heresy. Pius XI unambiguously taught: “When once men recognize, both in private and in public life, that Christ is King, society will at last receive the great blessings of real liberty, well-ordered discipline, peace and harmony” (Quas Primas, 19). Leo XIV’s reduction of the Church to a “construction site” of “charity in action” denies her divine constitution, fulfilling Pius X’s warning: “The abolition of the Church’s temporal power… would contribute in the greatest degree to the liberty and prosperity of the Church” (Syllabus, Error 76).
The antipope’s Synod references continue this apostasy by substituting divine authority with democratic processes condemned by Pius VI: “The Church listening cooperates… that the Church teaching should only approve the common opinions of the Church listening” (Lamentabili, 6). This inversion subverts the depositum fidei (deposit of faith) into collective opinion, denying the Church’s monarchical constitution established jure divino (by divine law).
Conclusion: Masonic Ecclesiology Unveiled
The article’s naturalized ecclesiology exposes the conciliar sect’s Masonic roots. By omitting the Unam Sanctam doctrine that “outside the Church there is no salvation” (Boniface VIII), Leo XIV advances religious indifferentism condemned by Gregory XVI as “insanity” (Mirari Vos, 13). His appeal to “inculturation” implements the Masonic strategy documented in the Alta Vendita: “Make the young accustom themselves to the broadest principles of Catholicism… but in such a way that they may be prepared to water them down later” (Permanent Instruction, 1820). True Catholics must reject this abomination and cling to the Missale Romanum and pre-1958 magisterium as the sole ark of salvation.
Source:
Pope Leo XIV: Build the Church on the solid foundations of Christ, not on worldly criteria (catholicnewsagency.com)
Date: 09.11.2025