Vatican News portal reports that on April 22, 2026, the usurper Robert Prevost, known as “Pope” Leo XIV, visited the “Pope Francis Technology School” in Mongomo, Equatorial Guinea, during his apostolic journey to Africa. The article describes the institution as one that “works to help young people in Equatorial Guinea develop technological skills and training,” and notes that the visit occurred one day after the first anniversary of Jorge Mario Bergoglio’s death. Leo XIV is quoted as calling Bergoglio “a devoted shepherd who touched so many hearts” and praising his “courageous witness” during “a change of era.” The article further mentions that Leo XIV invited journalists aboard the papal flight to join him in thanking the Lord for “the great gift of Francis’ life to the whole Church and the world.” This entire spectacle — a visit to a technology school named after a manifest heretic, on the anniversary of his death, accompanied by effusive praise for his destruction of Catholic doctrine — is not merely a diplomatic courtesy but a revelatory window into the spiritual bankruptcy of the conciliar sect and its complete abandonment of the Church’s supernatural mission.
The Technology School as Symbol: The Neo-Church’s Substitution of Grace with Worldly Competence
The choice of a “Pope Francis Technology School” as a destination for a papal visit is not accidental. It is a deliberate statement of priorities. The Church founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ exists for one purpose: “Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost” (Matt. 28:19). Her mission is the salvation of souls through the preaching of the Gospel, the administration of the sacraments, and the guidance of men toward eternal life. Pius XI, in Quas Primas, declared with absolute clarity that Christ’s kingdom “is primarily spiritual and relates mainly to spiritual matters” and that the Church’s authority “to teach men, to issue laws, to govern nations, which authority she received from Christ the Lord to lead men to eternal happiness,” must never be subordinated to secular power or reduced to naturalistic ends.
What does a technology school have to do with any of this? The answer is nothing — and that is precisely the point. The conciliar sect has so thoroughly abandoned the supernatural mission of the Church that it now openly celebrates institutions dedicated to “technological skills and training” as though they were instruments of the Gospel. This is the logical terminus of the modernist error condemned by St. Pius X in Lamentabili sane exitu, where he rejected the proposition that “the progress of sciences requires a reform of the concept of Christian doctrine concerning God, creation, Revelation, the Person of the Incarnate Word, and Redemption” (proposition 64), and the further proposition that “contemporary Catholicism cannot be reconciled with true knowledge without transforming it into a certain dogmaless Christianity, that is, into a broad and liberal Protestantism” (proposition 65). The technology school is the material embodiment of this dogmaless Christianity: a Church that has nothing to offer the world but vocational training, having emptied itself of all supernatural content.
Pius IX, in the Syllabus of Errors, condemned the proposition that “the best theory of civil society requires that popular schools open to children of every class of the people… should be freed from all ecclesiastical authority, control and interference, and should be fully subjected to the civil and political power” (proposition 47). Yet here we see the neo-church not merely submitting to secular control of education but actively celebrating it, naming its institutions after its own leaders, and treating technological formation as though it were a papal concern. The Church’s proper role in education, as defined by the same Pontiff, is to form youth in “sound doctrine and purity of morals” — not to equip them for participation in the global economy.
The Anniversary of Bergoglio’s Death: A Liturgical Calendar of Apostasy
The article notes with deliberate emphasis that the visit took place “one day after the first-year anniversary of Pope Francis’ passing.” This detail is not incidental; it is programmatic. The conciliar sect has constructed its own liturgical calendar of apostasy, commemorating the deaths of its architects with the same reverence that the true Church reserves for her martyrs and confessors. Leo XIV’s message, sent to the Mass celebrated at Santa Maria Maggiore, describes Bergoglio as “a devoted shepherd who touched so many hearts” and praises his “courageous witness” during “a change of era.”
Let us examine these phrases with the precision they deserve. A “devoted shepherd” in the Catholic sense is one who guards the flock against wolves, who defends the deposit of faith, who refuses to compromise doctrine for the sake of human approval. Bergoglio was the precise opposite: he was a wolf in shepherd’s clothing who systematically undermined Catholic doctrine on marriage, the moral law, the salvation of souls, and the nature of the Church itself. To call him a “devoted shepherd” is not merely false — it is blasphemous, for it attributes to a destroyer of souls the qualities that belong exclusively to Christ and His true ministers.
The phrase “a change of era” is particularly revealing. In the mouth of a Catholic pontiff, such language would be meaningless or heretical, for the Church does not undergo “changes of era” — she is the same yesterday, today, and forever (Heb. 13:8). But in the mouth of Leo XIV, praising Bergoglio, it is an honest admission: the conciliar revolution was precisely a “change of era,” a rupture with everything that came before, a new religion masquerading under the old name. St. Pius X warned of this in Pascendi Dominici Gregis, describing the modernists as those who seek “such a development of dogmas as appears to be their corruption.” Bergoglio was the culmination of this corruption, and Leo XIV’s praise for his role in the “change of era” is an unambiguous endorsement of the entire modernist project.
The Invitation to Journalists: Manufacturing Consent for Apostasy
Perhaps the most cynical detail in the entire article is the report that Leo XIV “invited journalists aboard the papal flight to join him in thanking the Lord for the great gift of Francis’ life to the whole Church and the world.” This is not piety — it is propaganda. The conciliar sect has always understood that its survival depends not on the grace of God but on the management of public perception. By inviting journalists to participate in a collective act of thanksgiving for Bergoglio, Leo XIV is using the apparatus of the secular media to sanctify a heretic, to create the impression that the entire “Church” — and indeed “the world” — is grateful for his life and work.
This is the same strategy that has been employed since the earliest days of the conciliar revolution. The Syllabus of Errors condemned the proposition that “the Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (proposition 80). This reconciliation has been achieved not through theological argument but through media manipulation, through the constant repetition of slogans — “mercy,” “dialogue,” “encounter,” “change of era” — designed to make apostasy appear as renewal and destruction as development. The journalists aboard the papal flight are not witnesses to a spiritual reality; they are participants in a staged spectacle designed to legitimize the illegitimate.
The Absence of the Supernatural: What the Article Does Not Say
The most damning aspect of this article is not what it says but what it does not say. There is no mention of the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass as the center of the papal visit (though a Mass is mentioned in passing, its nature — whether the true Mass or the Protestantized Novus Ordo — is left characteristically vague). There is no mention of the sacraments, of the state of grace, of the necessity of baptism for salvation, of the reality of hell, of the obligation of nations to submit to the social reign of Christ the King. There is no mention of sin, of repentance, of conversion, of the supernatural virtues of faith, hope, and charity.
Instead, we have technology schools, vocational training, and effusive praise for a dead heretic. This silence is not accidental — it is the defining characteristic of the conciliar sect. As the Defense of Sedevacantism document demonstrates, a manifest heretic ceases to be Pope and head, just as he ceases to be a Christian and member of the body of the Church (Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice). Bergoglio was a manifest heretic. Leo XIV, by recognizing him as a legitimate predecessor, praising his pontificate, and visiting institutions named after him, manifests his own heresy and his own exclusion from the Church. The article, in its studied silence about all things supernatural, merely confirms what doctrine already establishes: these men are not Catholic, their “Church” is not the Church of Christ, and their activities, however well-publicized, have no supernatural efficacy whatsoever.
The African Journey: Colonialism Repackaged as Apostolate
The article notes that this visit was part of Leo XIV’s “11-day four-nation Apostolic Journey to Africa.” The word “apostolic” is grotesquely misapplied here. True apostolate involves the preaching of the Gospel, the administration of the sacraments, and the establishment of the Church in communion with the Successor of Peter. What Leo XIV is doing in Africa is not apostolate but neo-colonialism — the extension of the conciar sect’s institutional presence into the developing world, offering technological training and naturalistic humanitarianism in exchange for the allegiance of local populations.
Pius XI, in Quas Primas, described the true expansion of Christ’s Kingdom through the work of missionaries who gained regions for the Catholic faith “with their sweat and blood.” The contrast with Leo XIV’s journey could not be starker. Where the true missionaries brought the grace of God, the sacraments, and the unchanging deposit of faith, the conciliar sect brings technology schools and vocational training. Where the true missionaries sought the conversion of nations to Catholicism, the conciliar sect seeks dialogue with all religions and the promotion of a universal naturalistic humanism. The “apostolic journey” is not apostolic at all — it is a public relations exercise designed to maintain the illusion that the conciliar sect is still the Catholic Church.
Conclusion: The Abomination of Desolation Continues
Every element of this article — the technology school, the anniversary of Bergoglio’s death, the praise for his “courageous witness,” the invitation to journalists, the silence about supernatural realities, the African journey — points to the same conclusion: the conciliar sect continues its relentless march toward the complete abandonment of the Catholic faith. Leo XIV is not a Pope visiting a school; he is the current figurehead of a paramasonic structure visiting an institution that symbolizes everything the true Church rejects: the subordination of the supernatural to the natural, the replacement of grace with technology, the worship of human progress instead of the adoration of God.
The faithful who still profess the integral Catholic faith must see these events for what they are: not merely errors or abuses, but the systematic destruction of the Church from within. As the False Fatima Apparitions document warns, the greatest danger to the Church has always been “modernist apostasy within the Church since the beginning of the 20th century” — the “enemies within” against whom St. Pius X warned. Leo XIV’s visit to the Pope Francis Technology School is simply the latest manifestation of this apostasy, and it must be rejected with the same firmness with which the Church has always rejected heresy: “A heretic, after the first and second admonition, avoid” (Titus 3:10).
Source:
Pope Leo visits Pope Francis Technology School in Equatorial Guinea (vaticannews.va)
Date: 22.04.2026