EWTN News portal reports that on April 24, 2026, the usurper Robert Prevost, known as “Pope Leo XIV,” granted so-called “ecclesiastical communion” to Mar Paul III Nona, the newly elected patriarch of the Chaldean Catholic Church, thereby formally recognizing him as head of an Eastern Catholic Church “in full communion with Rome.” The article explains that this act of “ecclesiastical communion” is the canonical mechanism by which the conciliar apparatus in the Vatican extends its authority over autonomous Eastern Churches, enabling the new patriarch to exercise his ministry, convene synods, and ordain bishops. The article further notes that this follows the resignation of Cardinal Louis Raphael Sako amid a legal and financial scandal. This entire narrative, presented with liturgical solemnity and bureaucratic precision, is a textbook illustration of how the post-conciliar sect perpetuates its counterfeit ecclesiology, reducing the supernatural reality of the Church’s unity to a mere administrative act within a globalized religious corporation, while remaining utterly silent on the state of apostasy that defines the conciliar era.
The Chimera of “Ecclesiastical Communion” in an Apostate Structure
The article’s central focus is the granting of “ecclesiastical communion” to the new Chaldean patriarch. This term, within the conciliar framework, is presented as the formal bond of unity with the “Apostolic See,” i.e., the usurper in the Vatican. The very need for such a formal act, post-election, reveals a fundamental departure from the Catholic understanding of the Church’s organic unity. In the true Church, unity is not a bureaucratic concession but a supernatural reality, a consequence of professing one faith, receiving the same sacraments, and being under the authority of the true successor of Peter. The conciliar sect, having severed itself from the true faith through its modernist innovations, must invent procedural mechanisms to simulate a unity it no longer possesses. As St. Pius X warned in Pascendi Dominici gregis, the modernists “aim at such a development of dogmas as appears to be their corruption.” The granting of “ecclesiastical communion” is not an act of the true Pope confirming a legitimate patriarch; it is an act of a usurper extending his illegitimate authority over a church structure that has, by and large, followed the conciliar revolution. The silence of the article regarding the doctrinal fidelity of the Chaldean Church to pre-conciliar teaching is deafening. Is this church a bastion of orthodoxy, or has it, like its Latin counterpart, embraced the errors of Vatican II? The article’s uncritical presentation of this act assumes the legitimacy of the entire concilar apparatus, a legitimacy that, from the perspective of integral Catholic faith, is non-existent.
The “Autonomy” That Masks Subservience
The article highlights that the Chaldean Church is “autonomous” in accordance with Canon 27 of the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches, allowing it to manage its internal affairs. This “autonomy” is a hallmark of the conciliar ecclesiology, which, under the guise of “respecting traditions,” effectively fragments the universal Church into a collection of national or ethnic churches, each with its own liturgical and disciplinary variations, yet all ultimately subservient to the central authority of the antipope. This is a direct contradiction to the Catholic understanding of the Church’s unity, where the Pope is not merely a “first among equals” but the Supreme Pontiff, the Vicar of Christ, with universal jurisdiction. As Pope Pius XI taught in Quas Primas, “His reign, namely, extends not only to Catholic nations or those who, by receiving baptism according to law, belong to the Church… but His reign encompasses also all non-Christians, so that most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ.” The conciliar model of “autonomous churches” is a step towards the very religious relativism and indifferentism condemned by Pope Pius IX in the Syllabus of Errors (Proposition 18: “Protestantism is nothing more than another form of the same true Christian religion, in which form it is given to please God equally as in the Catholic Church”). The Chaldean Church, by accepting this “autonomy” from the conciliar sect, implicitly accepts the modernist premise that the Church is a federation of churches rather than a single, divinely instituted society.
The “Resignation” of Cardinal Sako: A Glimpse into the Conciliar Underworld
The article briefly mentions the resignation of Cardinal Louis Raphael Sako “amid a legal and financial scandal surrounding a former bishop.” This detail, presented as a mere footnote, is a telling symptom of the moral and spiritual decay within the conciliar structures. While the article does not elaborate on the nature of the scandal, its very existence is a stark contrast to the sanctity expected of those who hold ecclesiastical office. The conciliar sect, with its emphasis on “dialogue” and “modernization,” has consistently failed to uphold the moral standards of the Church, leading to widespread corruption, both financial and moral. This is not an isolated incident but a systemic problem. As Pope Pius IX lamented in the Syllabus of Errors, “the masonic associations are anathematized by them not only in Europe but also in America and wherever they may be in the whole world.” The presence of such scandals within the very heart of the conciliar church structures is a clear indication of the influence of the “synagogue of Satan” that Pius IX warned against. The article’s failure to condemn this scandal, or even to express surprise, reveals its complicity in the normalization of corruption within the neo-church.
The Liturgical Commemoration: A Hollow Ritual
The article notes that the new patriarch was elected “on the day when the Chaldean liturgy commemorates the encounter of the risen Christ with St. Thomas.” This detail, intended to lend a sense of divine providence and continuity, is rendered meaningless within the context of the conciliar sect. The Chaldean liturgy, like all Eastern liturgies, has been subject to the modernizing pressures of the conciliar revolution. Has this commemoration retained its traditional theological depth, or has it been reinterpreted through the lens of modernist “consciousness”? The article’s silence on this point is telling. Furthermore, the encouragement to persevere as “true believers” in the face of “exceedingly arduous trials” is a hollow platitude when divorced from the means of grace. The “trials” faced by the faithful in Iraq are not merely political or social; they are spiritual, arising from the apostasy of their own church leaders. True perseverance requires the true faith, the true sacraments, and the true priesthood – all of which are compromised or absent within the conciliar structures. As St. Robert Bellarmine taught, “a Pope who is a manifest heretic, by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head.” If the head is corrupt, how can the members be healthy?
The Globalized Diaspora: A Mission Field for Modernism
The article mentions the Chaldean diaspora “becoming increasingly numerous.” This diaspora, scattered across the world, is a mission field not for the true faith, but for the conciar sect’s brand of modernism. The “ecclesiastical communion” granted to the new patriarch ensures that this diaspora remains under the sway of the antipope, receiving a watered-down, modernized version of Christianity that is more compatible with secular humanism than with the Gospel of Christ. The true Church has always sought to evangelize and convert, bringing souls to the knowledge of the true God and His Church. The conciliar sect, however, seeks to “accommodate” and “dialogue,” often at the expense of doctrinal clarity. The Chaldean diaspora, under the leadership of a patriarch recognized by the antipope, will be fed a diet of “ecumenism” and “interreligious dialogue,” rather than the uncompromising message of salvation through Christ alone. As Pope Leo XIII wrote in Satis Cognitum, “the Church is one, and therefore cannot be divided into many.” The conciliar model of multiple “autonomous churches” is a betrayal of this unity.
The Silence on the True Church
Perhaps the most damning aspect of the article is its complete silence on the true Church. There is no mention of the faithful who, adhering to the integral Catholic faith, have separated themselves from the conciliar sect. There is no mention of the bishops and priests who, ordained before 1958 or in the old rite, continue to offer the true Mass and administer the true sacraments. There is no mention of the state of apostasy that defines the conciliar era, as warned by St. Pius X and countless other saints and doctors. The article presents the conciliar sect as the only reality, the only “Church,” thereby perpetuating the illusion that the true Church has ceased to exist or has been absorbed into the modernist abomination. This is a deliberate act of disinformation, designed to prevent souls from finding the true path to salvation. As Our Lord Himself warned, “the time will come when whoever kills you will think he is offering God service” (John 16:2). The conciliar sect, in its persecution of those who cling to the true faith, fulfills this prophecy.
Conclusion: The Abomination of Desolation Continues
The granting of “ecclesiastical communion” to the new Chaldean patriarch is not an act of unity but an act of consolidation by the conciar sect. It is a demonstration of the antipope’s authority over a global network of churches that have abandoned the true faith. The article, by uncritically reporting this event, serves as a mouthpiece for the conciliar propaganda machine, presenting the abomination of desolation as the “Holy Father” and the “Apostolic See.” The faithful must not be deceived by these outward shows of authority and unity. The true Church endures, not in the grand basilicas of the Vatican, but in the hearts of those who profess the integral Catholic faith, receive the true sacraments, and remain faithful to the teachings of the saints and doctors of the Church. As Pope Pius IX declared in Quanta Cura, “the Church is a true and perfect society, entirely free, and endowed with proper and perpetual rights of her own, conferred upon her by her Divine Founder.” The conciliar sect, having rejected these rights and this Founder, is not the Church, but a counterfeit, a synagogue of Satan. Let us pray for the conversion of those ensnared in this deception, and for the restoration of the true Church, the Kingdom of Christ on earth.
Source:
What is ‘ecclesiastical communion,’ which Pope Leo XIV granted to the new Chaldean patriarch? (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 29.04.2026