Vatican News portal reports that on May 4, 2026, the usurper antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) received in audience the President of Iceland, Halla Tómasdóttir, who subsequently held talks with the so-called “Cardinal” Pietro Parolin and “Archbishop” Paul Richard Gallagher. The statement mentions “cordial discussions” about bilateral relations, the “positive contribution of the local Church,” “dialogue,” and “prospects for peace.” This entire spectacle is a textbook example of the conciliar sect’s reduction of the Catholic Church to a diplomatic NGO, devoid of any supernatural mission, engaged in the worship of “dialogue” and “peace” — the very hallmarks of modernist apostasy condemned by every Pope up to Pius XII.
The Apostolic Office Reduced to Diplomatic Protocol
The language of the Vatican News report is revealing in its utter vacuity. The antipope “received in audience” the President of Iceland, and “cordial discussions” were held. This is the language of secular diplomacy, not of the Vicar of Christ exercising the authority given to him by Our Lord Jesus Christ: “Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost” (Matthew 28:19).
Pius XI, in his encyclical Quas Primas (1925), taught with unmistakable clarity that the reign of Christ the King extends over all nations and all peoples, and that rulers have the duty to publicly honor Christ and obey Him. The State is nothing else than a harmonious association of men, and Christ is the author of prosperity and true happiness for individual citizens as well as for the state. Pius XI explicitly warned: “When God and Jesus Christ — as We lamented — were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed.”
What, then, did the usurper Leo XIV say to the President of Iceland about the Kingship of Christ? Did he demand, as was the duty of every true Pontiff, that Iceland publicly recognize the social reign of Our Lord Jesus Christ? Did he insist that Icelandic law be conformed to the commandments of God? The report is deafeningly silent on any such matter. Instead, we are offered the banalities of “good bilateral relations” and “dialogue.” This is not the language of Peter; it is the language of the United Nations.
The Omission of the Supernatural: The Gravest Accusation
The most damning aspect of this entire report is what it omits. There is no mention whatsoever of the supernatural mission of the Church. There is no mention of the salvation of souls, the necessity of baptism, the obligation of conversion to the Catholic Faith, the reality of sin, the need for repentance, or the eternal consequences of rejecting Christ and His Church.
Pius IX, in the Syllabus of Errors (1864), condemned the proposition that “In the present day it is no longer expedient that the Catholic religion should be held as the only religion of the State, to the exclusion of all other forms of worship” (Proposition 77). He further condemned the idea that “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (Proposition 80).
Yet this is precisely what the concilar sect does with every audience, every diplomatic meeting, every “dialogue.” The usurper sits in the chair of Peter — or rather, in the chair of an antipope occupying the Vatican — and discusses “regional and international issues” and “situations of conflict” as though the Church were merely another humanitarian organization. The entire apparatus of the Secretariat of State functions as a foreign ministry for a non-existent state, pursuing “peace” without Christ, “dialogue” without truth, and “the common good” without reference to the supernatural end of man.
St. Pius X, in Lamentabili Sane Exitu (1907), condemned the modernist proposition that “The Church is an enemy of the progress of natural and theological sciences” (Proposition 57) and that “Contemporary Catholicism cannot be reconciled with true knowledge without transforming it into a certain dogmaless Christianity, that is, into a broad and liberal Protestantism” (Proposition 65). The meeting between the antipope and the Icelandic President is a living embodiment of this condemned proposition: a dogmaless, creedless engagement with the world on the world’s own terms.
“The Local Church” and the Promotion of the Common Good
The report notes that “appreciation was expressed for the good bilateral relations, emphasizing the positive contribution of the local Church to the promotion of the common good of society and particularly of young people.”
This language is saturated with modernist assumptions. The phrase “the local Church” is conciliar code — a deliberate fragmentation of the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church into autonomous “local churches,” each supposedly adapting to its own culture. This stands in direct contradiction to the perennial teaching of the Magisterium. The Church is not a federation of local communities; it is a single, visible, hierarchical society founded by Christ, with the Roman Pontiff as its supreme head.
Furthermore, what does the conciliar sect mean by “the common good of society”? For the Catholic Magisterium, the common good is inseparable from the supernatural end of man. Leo XIII, in Immortale Dei, taught that the common good of the state requires the profession of the Catholic religion and the subordination of civil authority to the authority of the Church in matters pertaining to the salvation of souls. But for the conciliar sect, “the common good” has been stripped of all supernatural content and reduced to humanitarianism — feeding the hungry, comforting the afflicted, and promoting “dialogue” between conflicting parties.
And what of “particularly of young people”? What is the “local Church” in Iceland offering to young people? The new liturgy, which is a Protestantized assembly rather than the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass? The social teaching of Vatican II, which enshrines the heresy of religious liberty? The “dialogue” with modernity that St. Pius X identified as the very essence of Modernism? The young people of Iceland — and of every nation — need the true Faith, the true sacraments, and the true doctrine of the Kingship of Christ. They do not need the diplomatic niceties of an antipope and his secretary of state.
“Dialogue” and “Peace” Without Christ
The report states that “the conversation also focused on regional and international issues, especially situations of conflict, on the need for dialogue, and on prospects for peace.”
This is the litany of the conciliar revolution. “Dialogue” has become the supreme virtue of the neo-church, replacing the preaching of the Gospel. “Peace” has been redefined as the absence of conflict rather than “the tranquility of order” (St. Augustine) that can only exist when Christ reigns.
Pius XI warned in Quas Primas: “If men were ever to recognize Christ’s royal authority over themselves, both privately and publicly, then unheard-of blessings would flow upon the whole society, such as due freedom, order, and tranquility, and concord and peace.” Peace is not achieved through diplomatic negotiations between the antipope and secular rulers. Peace is achieved through the recognition of the Kingship of Christ and the conformity of all laws and institutions to the commandments of God.
The conciliar sect’s obsession with “dialogue” was condemned in advance by Pius IX, who anathematized those who claim that “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (Syllabus, Proposition 80). The entire diplomatic apparatus of the Vatican under the line of usurpers — from John XXIII through Leo XIV — is a machinery for the reconciliation of the Church with the world, which is nothing less than the betrayal of Our Lord Jesus Christ.
The Paramasonic Structure in Full Operation
This audience is not an isolated event. It is part of a systematic pattern that has characterized the conciliar sect since its inception. The usurpers sitting in the Vatican engage in endless diplomatic meetings with heads of state, participate in interreligious gatherings, promote “ecumenism,” and position the Church as a mediator in world affairs — all while never demanding the conversion of nations to the Catholic Faith, never proclaiming the social reign of Christ the King, and never condemning the errors that are destroying civilization.
Pius IX, in the Syllabus, identified the root of all these errors: “There exists no Supreme, all-wise, all-provident Divine Being, distinct from the universe” (Proposition 1), and “Human reason, without any reference whatsoever to God, is the sole arbiter of truth and falsehood, and of good and evil” (Proposition 3). The entire diplomatic activity of the conciliar sect operates on these modernist premises. God is not mentioned. The Church’s supernatural mission is not mentioned. The Kingship of Christ is not mentioned. Only “dialogue,” “peace,” and “the common good” — all defined in purely naturalistic terms.
The audience with the President of Iceland is thus not merely a diplomatic formality. It is a sacrament of the new religion — the religion of humanitarianism, dialogue, and world peace that the conciliar sect has erected in place of the Catholic Faith. It is the abomination of desolation operating in the holy place, speaking lies in the name of Him who is Truth itself.
Conclusion: The Duty of the Faithful
The faithful who still profess the integral Catholic duty must see these events for what they are: not the acts of the true Church, but the machinations of the conciliar sect — the paramasonic structure occupying the Vatican and perpetuating the revolution that began with John XXIII. Every audience, every diplomatic meeting, every “dialogue” conducted by the usurper antipopes is a further betrayal of the mission entrusted to the Church by Our Lord Jesus Christ.
The remedy is not reform of the conciliar structures — it is the uncompromising profession of the integral Catholic Faith, the rejection of all modernist novelties, and the restoration of the social reign of Christ the King over all nations. As Pius XI declared: “The Kingdom of our Redeemer encompasses all men… His reign extends not only to Catholic nations… but His reign encompasses also all non-Christians, so that most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ.”
Until that reign is recognized — in Iceland, in the Vatican, and in every nation — there will be no true peace, no true dialogue, and no true common good. There will only be the endless diplomatic theater of an antipope and his conciliar sect, playing at being the Church while the world rushes toward perdition.
Source:
Pope Leo XIV meets President Tómasdóttir of Iceland (vaticannews.va)
Date: 04.05.2026