Vatican’s Dozulé Apparition Rejection Exposes Conciliar Sect’s Doctrinal Bankruptcy
The Catholic News Agency portal reports on the conciliar sect’s Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith declaring alleged apparitions in Dozulé, France “not supernatural.” Cardinal Victor Manuel “Fernández” claims these 1972 visions – where Madeleine Aumont purportedly received messages about a “glorious cross” and Christ’s “imminent return” – contain doctrinal errors incompatible with their modernist interpretation of Catholicism. The declaration objects to comparing Dozulé’s cross with Jerusalem’s, warns against “material sacrality,” and rejects claims about remission of sins through contemplating this cross while dismissing predictions of Christ’s imminent Second Coming. This verdict exemplifies the conciliar sect’s theological incoherence and abandonment of true Catholic principles.
Illegitimate Authority Presumes to Judge Supernatural Realities
The very notion of “Cardinal” Fernández’s dicastery pronouncing on supernatural matters constitutes blasphemous presumption. As Pope Pius X decreed in Lamentabili Sane (1907): “The Church listening cooperates in such a way with the Church teaching in defining truths of faith, that the Church teaching should only approve the common opinions of the Church listening” (Proposition 6). The conciliar sect’s pseudo-clergy – invalidly ordained under Paul VI’s sacramental rites – lacks jurisdiction to bind or loose. Their “declaration” carries no theological weight, being issued by men who themselves propagate heresies condemned in Pope Pius IX’s Syllabus of Errors, particularly the notion that “human reason is the sole arbiter of truth and falsehood” (Proposition 3).
Modernist Contradictions in Rejecting Sacramentals While Promoting Novelty
The pseudo-dicastery’s condemnation of “material sacrality” directly opposes Catholic tradition. Pope Pius XI’s encyclical Quas Primas (1925) established Christ’s social kingship, declaring: “Nations will be reminded by the annual celebration of this feast that not only private individuals but also rulers and princes are bound to give public honor and obedience to Christ”. The Church has always honored sacramentals like the True Cross – a devotion spanning from St. Helena to the 1862 Monitum against rationalist attacks on relics. Fernández’s statement that “no cross, no relic… can replace the means of grace established by Christ” creates a false dichotomy, ignoring how sacramentals dispose souls toward sacramental grace (Council of Trent, Session XIII).
“To compare the cross requested at Dozulé with the cross of Jerusalem risks confusing the sign with the mystery”
This bureaucratic language exposes the conciliar sect’s naturalism. True Catholic theology distinguishes without separating sign and mystery – precisely why the Council of Ephesus (431 AD) defended sacred images against Nestorian rationalism. The real danger lies not in venerating crosses but in the conciliar sect’s own material desacralization witnessed in stripping altars, removing crucifixes, and turning churches into modernist meeting spaces.
Millenarianism Accusation Reveals Eschatological Apostasy
The declaration’s condemnation of predictions about Christ’s “imminent return” constitutes theological malpractice. While indeed “no one knows the day or hour” (Matthew 24:36), Our Lord commanded vigilance for “the signs of the times” (Matthew 16:3). The Apocalypse describes specific eschatological markers – including apostasy (2 Thessalonians 2:3) and the reign of Antichrist – which Catholic exegetes from St. Augustine to Cornelius a Lapide properly investigated. By dismissing all prophetic interpretation as “millenarian,” the conciliar sect fulfills St. Paul’s warning about “scoffers following their own passions saying ‘Where is the promise of His coming?'” (2 Peter 3:3-4).
Silence on True Heresies While Manufacturing False Orthodoxy
Most damning is the pseudo-dicastery’s selective outrage. It condemns Aumont’s claim that “all those who repent at the glorious cross will be saved” as contrary to sacramental theology – yet remains silent about conciliar sect leaders like “Pope” Leo XIV granting television interviews claiming non-Catholics achieve salvation without conversion. The 2025 “Synod on Synodality” promotes Eucharistic sharing with heretics, directly violating the Council of Trent’s anathema: “If anyone says that faith alone is sufficient preparation for receiving the Eucharist, let him be anathema” (Session XIII, Canon 11). This hypocrisy exposes the conciliar sect as not a guardian of doctrine but an agent of doctrinal dissolution.
Theological Bankruptcy of Private Revelation Criteria
The entire discernment process relies on the conciliar sect’s 2023 Norms for Discerning Alleged Supernatural Phenomena – a modernist document replacing supernatural criteria with sociological considerations like “theological hermeneutics” and “ecclesial reception.” Contrast this with Pope Benedict XIV’s rigorous threefold test in De Servorum Dei Beatificatione (1734-1738): 1) Doctrinal orthodoxy, 2) Moral probity of visionaries, 3) Verified miracles. The conciliar sect applies subjective standards while rejecting authentic apparitions like La Salette (1846) – where Our Lady warned of Rome becoming “the seat of the Antichrist” – precisely because their message indicts the conciliar apostasy.
Fatima Reference Exposes Conciliar Double Standards
The article’s embedded promotion of Fátima’s “Miracle of the Sun” reveals the conciliar sect’s epistemological chaos. As documented in the file False Fatima Apparitions, Fátima constitutes a Masonic psychological operation with “mass optical manipulation (natural phenomenon) and mass panic and autosuggestion.” The conciliar sect alternately suppresses or exploits Fátima based on political expediency – Bergoglio consecrated Russia to an “Immaculate Heart” without specifying Catholic conversion, fulfilling the file’s warning about “imprecise formulation ‘conversion of Russia’ opening the way to religious relativism.”
Conclusion: False Shepherds Judging False Visions
Ultimately, this Dozulé declaration represents wolves in shepherds’ clothing presuming to judge private revelations while propagating public heresies. As Pope Pius IX proclaimed in Qui Pluribus (1846): “The enemies of divine revelation extol human progress to the skies… to attack with more pertinacity and confidence the Catholic faith.” The conciliar sect’s theological incoherence – rejecting sacramentals while inventing novel eco-idolatries, condemning millenarianism while promoting apocalyptic climate cultism – proves its complete rupture from Catholic Tradition. True believers recognize neither Fernández’s decrees nor the conciliar anti-church’s false magisterium, cleaving instead to the unchanging depositum fidei guarded by pre-1958 popes and councils.
Source:
Vatican declares alleged apparitions of Jesus in France ‘not supernatural’ (catholicnewsagency.com)
Date: 12.11.2025