Jesuit Appointment to Honolulu Exposes the Neo-Church’s Anti-Catholic Agenda

The National Catholic Register reports that on May 6, 2026, the antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) appointed Jesuit priest Michael T. Castori as the sixth “bishop” of the Honolulu “diocese.” The appointment follows the accepted resignation of the previous usurper, Clarence Silva, aged 76. Castori, born in 1960, holds degrees from Harvard, Berkeley, and Fordham, and has served in academic and pastoral roles, including chaplaincy to Tongan communities and San Quentin prison. This appointment is not merely administrative; it is a deliberate reinforcement of the conciliar sect’s modernist and naturalistic agenda, continuing the systematic destruction of authentic Catholic hierarchy and doctrine.


The Jesuit Order: A History of Subversion

The Society of Jesus, founded by Ignatius of Loyola in 1540, has a complex history within the Church. While initially established to combat Protestantism and promote Catholic education, the order has been repeatedly implicated in political intrigue, theological deviation, and even suppression by the Holy See (notably by Clement XIV in 1773). In the modern era, particularly after Vatican II, the Jesuits have become synonymous with liberation theology, religious indifferentism, and outright dissent from Catholic moral teaching. Their emphasis on “social justice” often eclipses the primary mission of the Church: the salvation of souls through the preaching of the Gospel and the administration of the sacraments. The appointment of a Jesuit to any episcopal see, especially in the current climate of total apostasy, signals a commitment to furthering the revolutionary agenda rather than upholding immutable truth.

Academic Credentials vs. Supernatural Faith

The press release highlights Castori’s impressive academic pedigree: a classics degree from Harvard, a master of divinity from Berkeley, a Ph.D. in Near Eastern religions from UC Berkeley, and a licentiate in sacred theology from Fordham. This emphasis on secular and non-Catholic academic achievements reveals the neo-church’s prioritization of worldly wisdom over supernatural faith and orthodoxy. As Pope Pius IX condemned in the Syllabus of Errors, “Human reason, without any reference whatsoever to God, is the sole arbiter of truth and falsehood” (Proposition 3), and “The method and principles by which the old scholastic doctors cultivated theology are no longer suitable to the demands of our times” (Proposition 13). A doctorate in Near Eastern religions from a secular university is particularly suspect, as it likely involves the study of non-Christian religions from a relativistic perspective, fostering the very indifferentism that the true Church condemns. The focus on academic credentials from institutions like Harvard and Berkeley, known for their liberal and often anti-Catholic biases, underscores the conciar sect’s alignment with worldly intellectual trends rather than the perennial philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas.

Pastoral Experience: Social Work Over Souls

Castori’s pastoral experience includes chaplaincy to Tongan Catholic communities and San Quentin State Prison. While caring for the spiritual needs of the faithful is commendable, the context of the neo-church often transforms such roles into platforms for social activism rather than the conversion of souls and the administration of valid sacraments. The mention of San Quentin, a notorious prison, without any reference to the necessity of repentance, conversion, or the supernatural grace of the sacraments, suggests a focus on temporal welfare and social integration rather than the eternal destiny of the inmates. This aligns with the modernist error condemned by St. Pius X in Pascendi Dominici Gregis, which reduces religion to a mere “sentiment” or “experience” aimed at improving earthly conditions rather than achieving union with God. The true Church has always taught that the primary purpose of pastoral care is to lead souls to Heaven, not to make their earthly existence more comfortable.

The Vacancy of the Episcopal See: A Symptom of Apostasy

The acceptance of Bishop Silva’s resignation at age 76 follows the conciliar practice of mandatory retirement, a disciplinary innovation not rooted in divine law. This practice allows for the rapid turnover of “bishops” and the appointment of individuals more aligned with the current antipode’s agenda. The fact that Silva led the “diocese” since 2005 means he was appointed by Benedict XVI (Joseph Ratzinger), another antipode whose pontificate was marked by the continuation of the conciliar revolution. The seamless transition from one modernist “bishop” to another demonstrates the systemic nature of the apostasy; there is no room for genuine orthodoxy within the structures of the neo-church. As the Defense of Sedevacantism argues, a manifest heretic loses his office automatically (ipso facto) by virtue of his heresy, and thus Silva’s resignation is merely a formality, as he never possessed true jurisdiction in the first place.

The Name “Our Lady of Peace”: A Modernist Invocation

The Cathedral Basilica of Our Lady of Peace in Honolulu bears a title that, while traditionally associated with the Blessed Virgin Mary, has been co-opted by the neo-church to promote its false ecumenism and religious indifferentism. In the context of the conciliar sect, “peace” often refers to a worldly harmony devoid of the supernatural peace that comes from submission to Christ the King. Pope Pius XI, in Quas Primas, explicitly stated that “the hope of lasting peace will not yet shine upon nations as long as individuals and states renounce and do not wish to recognize the reign of our Savior.” The emphasis on “peace” without the explicit acknowledgment of Christ’s kingship and the necessity of conversion to the Catholic faith is a hallmark of modernist diplomacy, which seeks unity at the expense of truth. The use of such titles in the neo-church’s liturgy and architecture serves to obscure the true nature of the Blessed Virgin Mary as the Mediatrix of all graces and the Queen of Heaven, reducing her to a symbol of vague spiritual comfort.

The Role of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops

The press release originates from the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), the official assembly of the conciliar sect in the United States. The USCCB has been a primary vehicle for the implementation of the conciar agenda, promoting religious liberty, interfaith dialogue, and social justice initiatives that contradict Catholic doctrine. Its communication apparatus, including outlets like the National Catholic Register, serves to legitimize the appointments and actions of the antipode and his collaborators. The USCCB’s role in disseminating this appointment is not neutral; it is an act of propaganda designed to maintain the illusion of continuity and legitimacy for the neo-church. As the Syllabus of Errors condemns, “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church” (Proposition 55), yet the USCCB actively engages in political lobbying and social activism, blurring the lines between the spiritual and temporal realms in a manner contrary to Catholic teaching.

The Absence of Supernatural Criteria

Throughout the announcement, there is no mention of the supernatural qualifications necessary for a true bishop: sanctity of life, orthodoxy of doctrine, zeal for the salvation of souls, and a firm commitment to the propagation of the Catholic faith. Instead, the criteria are entirely naturalistic: academic degrees, pastoral experience in social contexts, and administrative competence. This reflects the modernist heresy that the Church is merely a human institution subject to evolution and adaptation to contemporary needs. The true Church has always taught that the episcopacy is a sacramental office conferred by the Holy Ghost for the governance of souls, not a managerial position to be filled based on secular credentials. The appointment of Michael T. Castori is thus a further step in the de-Catholicization of the hierarchy, replacing shepherds with administrators and prophets with social workers.

Conclusion: A Call to Reject the Neo-Church

The appointment of Jesuit priest Michael T. Castori as “bishop” of Honolulu by the antipope Leo XIV is not a cause for concern among the faithful; it is yet another confirmation of the complete apostasy of the conciar sect. The emphasis on secular academic achievements, social pastoral experience, and the absence of supernatural criteria reveal the true nature of the neo-church: a human institution dedicated to the promotion of naturalistic humanism under the guise of religion. The faithful must reject these appointments and the entire structure of the conciar sect, clinging instead to the immutable Tradition of the Catholic Church. As Pope Pius IX declared in Quas Primas, “The State must leave the same freedom to the members of Orders and Congregations, both male and female, who are indeed the most valiant helpers of the Pastors of the Church and contribute most to the expansion and establishment of Christ’s Kingdom.” The true Church endures in the faithful who profess the integral Catholic faith and are led by bishops with valid sacraments and validly ordained priests, not in the structures of the Antichrist.


Source:
Pope Leo XIV Appoints Jesuit Priest As Bishop of Honolulu
  (ncregister.com)
Date: 06.05.2026

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top
Antichurch.org
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.