VaticanNews portal reports on May 10, 2026, that the usurper Robert Prevost, styling himself “Pope Leo XIV,” delivered a Regina Coeli address expressing “concern” over escalating violence in the Sahel region of Africa, particularly in Chad and Mali, where al-Qaida-linked terrorist attacks have killed dozens. The address was timed to coincide with a meeting in the Vatican of the John Paul II Foundation for the Sahel. The antipope assured his “prayers for the victims,” expressed “closeness to all who suffer,” and “encouraged every effort for peace and development in that beloved land.” The article contextualizes the crisis in terms of climate change, food and water shortages, government corruption, coups, insurgencies, terrorism, migration, and geopolitical competition, citing analysts and security networks. It is a masterclass in the conciliar religion’s reduction of every human catastrophe to purely naturalistic categories, while the supernatural order — the only order that truly matters — is rendered invisible.
The Complete Absence of the Supernatural Order
The most immediately striking feature of this address, and of the VaticanNews article that reports it, is the total, absolute, and deafening silence on the supernatural causes of the Sahel’s suffering. Not a single word is mentioned about sin, the state of grace, the necessity of conversion to the Catholic faith, the reality of demonic influence, or the divine punishments that inevitably befall nations and peoples who abandon God’s laws. This is not a minor omission — it is the defining characteristic of the conciliar apostasy, the very essence of the Modernism condemned by Saint Pius X in Pascendi Dominici gregis as “the synthesis of all errors.”
When Leo XIV speaks of “violence,” “terrorism,” “instability,” and “humanitarian crisis,” he does so in the exact same language as any secular head of state, any United Nations bureaucrat, or any CNN commentator. There is nothing — nihil — in his words that would distinguish his address from that of a purely naturalistic humanist organization. This is precisely what the Syllabus of Errors condemned in Proposition 80: the notion that the Roman Pontiff “can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization.” The antipope has done exactly this: he has reconciled himself with the world, and in doing so, he has abdicated the only mission that legitimizes the existence of the Holy See — the salvation of souls through the preaching of the integral Catholic faith.
“Peace and Development” — The Conciliar Mantra
The phrase “peace and development” appears repeatedly in the article and in the antipope’s quoted words. This is not accidental. It is the standard liturgical formula of the post-conciliar sect, deployed in every address, every encyclical, and every “papal” intervention since the abomination of Vatican II. It is a phrase that sounds virtuous to modern ears but is, in reality, a direct repudiation of the teaching of Pope Pius XI in Quas Primas.
Pius XI taught with absolute clarity: “the hope of lasting peace will not yet shine upon nations as long as individuals and states renounce and do not wish to recognize the reign of our Savior.” He further stated: “the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ” and that “the state is happy not by one means, and man by another; for the state is nothing else than a harmonious association of men.” The peace Pius XI spoke of was explicitly and exclusively the peace of Christ in the Kingdom of Christ — a peace that can only be achieved through the recognition of Christ the King’s authority over all nations, all rulers, and all aspects of public and private life.
By contrast, Leo XIV’s “peace” is a purely horizontal, temporal, and naturalistic concept. It is the peace of the United Nations Charter, not the peace of the Gospel. It is a peace that requires no conversion, no repentance, no submission to the Social Kingship of Christ. It is, in the words of Pius XI, the false peace that comes from “removing Jesus Christ and His most holy law from customs, from private, family, and public life” — the very thing the antipope perpetuates with every such address.
The John Paul II Foundation for the Sahel: Apostasy Institutionalized
The article notes that the Regina Coeli address was delivered “on the day after a meeting in the Vatican with representatives of the John Paul II Foundation for the Sahel.” This foundation, named after the arch-heretic and apostate Karol Wojtyła, is itself a product of the conciliar revolution. John Paul II, as documented extensively, was a manifest heretic who embraced religious liberty, false ecumenism, and the democratization of the Church — all condemned by the pre-conciliar Magisterium. A foundation bearing his name, operating within the structures occupying the Vatican, can only perpetuate his errors.
The very existence of such a foundation, dedicated to “development” in a region where the primary need is evangelization and the establishment of Christ’s Kingdom, reveals the complete inversion of the Church’s mission. As Pius XI taught in Quas Primas, the Church’s mission is “to teach, govern, and lead all to eternal happiness” — not to manage humanitarian crises, not to promote “development” in the secular sense, and not to serve as a supplementary agency to the United Nations. The foundation’s work, whatever its temporal benefits may be, is built on the heretical premise that the Church’s primary concern is earthly welfare rather than eternal salvation.
The Silence on Islam: Cowardice or Complicity?
The article mentions that the attacks in Mali were “claimed by the al-Qaida-linked JNIM” — an explicitly Islamic terrorist organization. Yet neither the antipope nor the article makes any reference to the religious dimension of this violence. Islam is not mentioned. The reality that these attacks are motivated by a false religion that explicitly rejects the divinity of Christ, the Holy Trinity, and the Redemption is completely suppressed.
This silence is not neutrality — it is complicity with religious indifferentism, the very error condemned by Pius IX in the Syllabus of Errors (Proposition 15: “Every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which, guided by the light of reason, he shall consider true”) and by Vatican I’s Dei Filius. The Catholic Church has always taught that there is no salvation outside the Church (extra ecclesiam nulla salus) and that false religions are not paths to God but obstacles to salvation. By refusing to name Islam as a false religion and by treating the violence in the Sahel as a purely political and humanitarian problem, the antipope implicitly endorses the conciliar heresy of religious liberty proclaimed in Dignitatis Humanae — a document that directly contradicts the perennial Magisterium.
Climate Change and Naturalistic Reductionism
The article devotes significant attention to “ecological and climatic significance,” “the climate crisis,” “frequent shortages of food and water,” and “worsening environmental stress.” While the Church certainly acknowledges that God governs the natural order and that environmental stewardship is a legitimate concern, the reduction of a spiritual and moral crisis to primarily environmental and climatic factors is a hallmark of Modernist naturalism.
The Sahel’s suffering is not primarily caused by climate change. It is caused by sin — by the rejection of God, by the prevalence of false religions, by the abandonment of Christian moral law, by the corruption of rulers who serve themselves rather than God, and by the failure of the Church’s lawful pastors to preach the Gospel integrally and without compromise. As Saint Pius X warned in Lamentabili sane exitu (Proposition 20): “Revelation was merely man’s self-awareness of his relationship to God” — this is precisely the error that underlies the conciliar approach to every crisis. When the antipope and his media apparatus interpret human suffering through the lens of climate change, migration, and geopolitical competition rather than through the lens of sin, grace, and divine judgment, they reveal themselves as naturalists, not Catholics.
The Rhetoric of “Concern” and “Closeness”
The article reports that Leo XIV “expressed concern” and “expressed his closeness to all who suffer.” This is the bureaucratic, therapeutic language of the post-conciliar sect — language designed to simulate compassion without requiring any supernatural action. True pastoral concern, in the Catholic sense, would involve:
- Preaching repentance — calling sinners to conversion, warning of eternal punishment, and urging the reception of the sacraments.
- Condemning error — naming Islam as a false religion, condemning terrorism as a moral evil, and calling for the establishment of Catholic states that recognize Christ the King.
- Offering the true means of grace — promoting the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, the sacraments, and Catholic devotion as the only true sources of peace and justice.
- Warning of divine judgment — reminding rulers and peoples that God punishes nations that abandon His law and that no amount of “development” or “cooperation” can substitute for obedience to the divine commandments.
None of this is present. Instead, we have the empty, performative empathy of a man who occupies the Vatican but possesses no authority from Christ — a man whose words are indistinguishable from those of any secular humanitarian organization.
The Geopolitical Blindness of the Conciliar Sect
The article notes that “international counterterrorism missions have receded in recent years, and regional cooperation has weakened, creating openings for armed groups to consolidate control in rural areas.” It also mentions that “the Sahel remains a major corridor for migrants traveling from sub-Saharan Africa toward North Africa and Europe” and that “analysts warn that renewed violence could sharply increase displacement, adding pressure on coastal states and European destinations.”
This framing reveals the conciliar sect’s complete absorption into the globalist worldview. The concern is not for the souls of the people of the Sahel, not for the establishment of Christ’s Kingdom in that region, not for the conversion of its inhabitants to the Catholic faith — but for the stability of European borders and the management of migration flows. This is the logic of the secular state, not the logic of the Church. As Pius XI taught, the Church’s mission encompasses “all non-Christians, so that most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ” — not as a problem to be managed, but as souls to be saved.
Conclusion: The Abomination of Desolation Speaks
Every word of this address, every line of this article, confirms what the faithful have long known: the structures occupying the Vatican are not the Catholic Church. They are a paramasonic structure dedicated to the destruction of the faith and the establishment of a one-world religion of naturalistic humanism. The antipope’s appeal for “peace and development” in the Sahel is not a Catholic act — it is a humanitarian gesture devoid of supernatural content, devoid of doctrinal substance, and devoid of any reference to the only true source of peace: Our Lord Jesus Christ, King of kings and Lord of lords.
The faithful must reject this counterfeit “concern” and return to the immutable teaching of the Church: that peace is only possible in the Kingdom of Christ (Pius XI, Quas Primas); that there is no salvation outside the Church; that false religions must be condemned, not accommodated; and that the primary mission of the Church is not “development” but the salvation of souls through the preaching of the Gospel and the administration of the sacraments. The Sahel — and all the world — does not need the empty words of an antipope. It needs the integral Catholic faith, preached without compromise by true pastors with valid authority and valid orders. Ad maiorem Dei gloriam.
Source:
Pope appeals for peace and development efforts in the Sahel region (vaticannews.va)
Date: 10.05.2026