EWTN News portal reports on the response to the encyclical *Magnifica Humanitas* by the antipope Leo XIV, which warns against the unchecked development of artificial intelligence, framing it as a potential “new Tower of Babel.” The article highlights the tension between the rapid expansion of AI data centers in the United States—facing local protests over environmental impact, resource consumption, and job displacement—and the Vatican’s call for ethical guidelines centered on human dignity, the common good, and the distribution of power. It features commentary from Catholic academics and a data center executive who attempt to reconcile the industry’s practices with the encyclical’s admonitions. While the article presents a surface-level engagement with the ethical questions posed by AI, it ultimately reveals the profound spiritual bankruptcy of a “magisterium” that has abdicated its divine mandate to preach the supernatural end of man, instead reducing the Church’s mission to a bureaucratic consultancy for secular technological progress.
The “Magisterium” of Man: How the Conciliar Sect Reduces the Faith to Mere Ethics
The article presented by EWTN News is a textbook example of the post-conciliar obsession with “relevance” at the expense of truth. By framing the warnings of Leo XIV within the context of secular debates over data centers, tax incentives, and energy consumption, the neo-church demonstrates that it has fully embraced the spirit of the world. The so-called encyclical *Magnifica Humanitas* is not a supernatural warning against sin and damnation, but a technocratic policy paper that seeks to baptize the latest industrial revolution with a veneer of Catholic terminology.
The very title, “Magnificent Humanity,” exposes the core heresy of Modernism: the cult of man. Instead of directing souls to the worship of God and the salvation of their immortal souls, the post-conciliar structures are fixated on the material well-being of the human race in this valley of tears. This is the “democratization of the Church” in action, where the hierarchical authority established by Christ to teach, govern, and sanctify is reduced to a mere advisory board for multinational corporations and secular governments.
The Silence on the Supernatural: The Defining Characteristic of Apostasy
The most damning aspect of this entire discourse is the absolute silence regarding the supernatural order. In a discussion about a technology with the potential to fundamentally alter human existence and society, there is no mention of the state of grace, the danger of mortal sin, the reality of Hell, or the necessity of the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass for the propitiation of sins. The “Catholic scholars” quoted, such as David Cloutier and Father Philip Larrey, speak of “dignity of work” and “solidarity” in purely naturalistic terms, indistinguishable from the rhetoric of any secular humanist organization.
True Catholic social teaching, as articulated by Leo XIII in *Rerum Novarum* and Pius XI in *Quadragesimo Anno*, is grounded in the premise that the economy must be subordinated to the moral law and the ultimate end of man: the Beatific Vision. To speak of “power concentration” without mentioning the divine right of Christ the King over all nations and all aspects of life—including technology—is to engage in a hollow, worldly activism that leads souls away from God. The Tower of Babel was not merely a failure of resource management or a case of poor urban planning; it was an act of pride against God, an attempt by man to reach heaven by his own power without God. By reducing this biblical warning to a metaphor for “unregulated AI,” the antipope and his followers commit a blasphemous trivialization of Sacred Scripture.
The Heresy of “Invincible Ignorance” in the Guise of Prudential Judgment
The article quotes Judith McGill, a vice president at DataBank, who claims her company’s work is “absolutely in line with the pope’s encyclical.” This assertion is a perfect illustration of the religious indifferentism that has infected the post-conciliar church. The idea that a corporation driven by profit can align itself with the teachings of Christ’s Vicar is a modernist fantasy. The Church has always taught that the pursuit of wealth must be tempered by charity and justice, and that the accumulation of riches at the expense of the poor is a grave sin. To baptize the data center industry—which consumes vast amounts of energy and water while offering minimal permanent employment—as being in harmony with Catholic teaching is to make a mockery of the Gospel.
Furthermore, the article cites the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) guidelines as a benchmark for ethical behavior. This is a clear example of the neo-church’s reliance on secular, and often Masonic, organizations to define morality. The Church does not need the OECD to tell her how to behave; she has the immutable doctrine of the Fathers and the Magisterium. By appealing to such external authorities, the conciliar sect admits that it has lost its own divine compass.
The Omission of the Masonic Roots of Technological Utopianism
The article fails to identify the true spiritual danger of the AI revolution: its roots in the Masonic project of building a New World Order. The drive to create artificial intelligence, to merge man with machine, and to centralize power in the hands of a technological elite is not a neutral development; it is the fulfillment of the Masonic dream of a universal religion and a global government that rejects the sovereignty of Christ the King.
Pius IX, in the Syllabus of Errors, condemned the idea that “the Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (Proposition 80). The entire premise of the article—that the neo-church should engage with and guide the development of AI—is a direct violation of this condemnation. The Church’s mission is not to baptize the projects of the Antichrist but to condemn them and call all men to repentance.
The “foreign-directed propaganda” cited by Interior Secretary Doug Burgum is a distraction from the real enemy, which is the internal rot of Modernism. The true “Tower of Babel” is not a data center in Virginia; it is the Vatican itself, occupied by men who have rejected the divine constitution of the Church and replaced it with a humanist club focused on “dialogue” and “progress.”
The Abdication of Authority: From Shepherd to Social Commentator
Perhaps the most revealing moment in the article is the dismissal of Leo XIV’s guidance by Doug Burgum, who laughed and said, “I didn’t know that tech editorializing was part of the role of being pope.” While this statement is offensive, it is also, in a perverse way, accurate. The role of the true Pope is not to editorialize on technology but to define faith and morals with infallible authority. By entering the fray of secular technological debate, the antipope has reduced the papacy to the level of a think tank or an NGO.
The true Church, led by a true Pope, would not issue “guidelines” for AI development; it would pronounce moral absolutes. It would declare that any technology that leads men away from God, that facilitates sin, or that concentrates power in the hands of the enemies of Christ is intrinsically evil and must be rejected. Instead, we get vague platitudes about “safeguarding humanity” and “the common good,” which can be twisted to justify anything.
Conclusion: The Neo-Church as a Chaplain to the World
The article from EWTN News is a sad testament to the state of the conciliar sect. It shows a “church” that has completely capitulated to the spirit of the time, more concerned with being “relevant” to the technological debate than with saving souls. The warnings of Leo XIV are not a return to Tradition but a further descent into the abyss of Modernism, where the supernatural is ignored, the natural is deified, and the Church becomes a mere chaplain to the world’s projects.
The faithful must reject this false “magisterium” and cling to the unchanging truth of the Catholic faith. The only true response to the challenges of the modern world is a return to the Social Kingship of Christ, the establishment of His reign over all nations and all aspects of life, and the recognition that no technological progress can compensate for the loss of faith and the rejection of God’s law. The “Magnificent Humanity” of the encyclical is a counterfeit; the only true magnificence is that of the saints who despised the world and all its works for the love of God.
Source:
Pope’s AI warnings come as Americans grapple with data center expansions (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 03.06.2026