Conciliar Sect Promotes Scripture Distortion Under Guise of Accessibility
Vatican News portal (November 17, 2025) reports on “Pope” Leo XIV’s address to the Catholic Biblical Federation, advocating for “easy access to Sacred Scripture” through digital means to reach younger generations. The article quotes the usurper of the Apostolic See invoking *Dei Verbum* – Vatican II’s constitution on revelation – claiming it demands “easy access to Sacred Scripture should be provided for all the Christian faithful” while urging biblical scholars to develop “new forms of biblical outreach“. This synodal propaganda masks a deliberate severing of Scripture from its dogmatic moorings, continuing the Modernist project of replacing immutable truth with experiential relativism.
Dei Verbum’s Subversion of Divine Revelation
The conciliar sect’s appeal to *Dei Verbum* constitutes theological treason. Pius IX’s Syllabus of Errors condemned the notion that “Divine revelation is imperfect, and therefore subject to a continual and indefinite progress” (Error 5). Yet Leo XIV’s insistence on “new forms of biblical outreach” directly implements this condemned proposition, treating Scripture as malleable material for “pastoral ministry” rather than the inerrant Word demanding submission.
When the antipope states “We are called to hear the Word of God with reverence and to proclaim it with faith“, he perverts the Council of Trent’s decree on Scripture: “No one…may dare to interpret Sacred Scripture contrary to that sense which Holy Mother Church has held and holds” (Session IV). The conciliar sect replaces the Church’s divinely-appointed magisterial authority with existential “encounter” – precisely the subjectivism condemned in St. Pius X’s Lamentabili: “The faith as assent of the mind is ultimately based on a sum of probabilities” (Error 25).
Digital Evangelization as Tool of Modernist Apostasy
Leo XIV’s concern for “new generations inhabit[ing] new digital environments” reveals the sect’s capitulation to technological tyranny. Pius XI’s encyclical Quas Primas established that “Christ must reign in the mind of man, whose duty it is to accept revealed truths with complete submission“, not adapt truth to digital platforms. The conciliar sect inverts this hierarchy, treating Scripture as content to be algorithmically distributed rather than the living voice of God requiring ordered transmission through Apostolic channels.
This digital obsession ignores the Church’s perennial warning against unsupervised Scripture reading. The Council of Toulouse (1229) and Index of Forbidden Books (1559) restricted vernacular Bibles to prevent private interpretation – a discipline maintained until Vatican II’s rupture. When Leo XIV claims “easy access to Sacred Scripture should be provided for all“, he rejects the wisdom of Gregory XVI’s Mirari Vos against “indifferentism” and Pius VII’s condemnation of Bible societies as “pests” in Ecclesiam a Jesu Christo.
Kerygma Over Doctrine: The Modernist Core
The article’s reference to “proclamation of the kerygma” exposes the neo-modernist essence of this enterprise. Pius X’s Pascendi unmasked Modernists who “distinguish between the Christ of history and the Christ of faith“, reducing revelation to existential experience. By prioritizing “dynamic inspiration” over doctrinal clarity, the conciliar sect implements Loisy’s condemned thesis that “truth changes with man” (Lamentabili, Error 58).
Nowhere does the article mention the necessity of:
the Church’s authoritative interpretation, the dangers of private judgment, or the anathemas against those who distort Scripture (Council of Trent, Session IV).
This silence is strategic. As St. Pius X warned, Modernists “use the Gospel to destroy the Gospel” – employing biblical language to subvert dogma. When Leo XIV invokes “cultural spaces where the Gospel is unfamiliar or distorted“, he ironically describes his own sect’s project of replacing the depositum fidei with anthropological accommodation.
Marian Devotion Weaponized Against Mariology
The usurper’s conclusion invoking “the Blessed Virgin Mary…the womb through which the Word became flesh” constitutes blasphemous reductionism. Leo XIV’s Mariology – stripped of her Immaculate Conception, Perpetual Virginity, and Mediatrix role – mirrors Paul VI’s heresy of reducing Mary to “Mother of the Church“. This vacuous reference weaponizes Marian devotion to legitimize Scripture-twisting, recalling Pius IX’s condemnation of those who “equate the Christian religion with false religions” (Syllabus, Error 18).
True Marian piety, as defined by Pius XII’s Munificentissimus Deus, recognizes her as “the destroyer of all heresies” – not as post-conciliar iconography’s mute bystander to ecumenical apostasy.
Conclusion: Digital Babel Replaces Pentecost
The conciliar sect’s digital scripture campaign completes Luther’s revolution by democratizing interpretation through technological means. Where Pius IX condemned “freedom of conscience and worship” as “insanity” (Quanta Cura), the Vatican II sect now promotes digital “accessibility” as vehicle for relativistic encounter. This apostasy was foretold in Pius X’s Pascendi: “They will substitute for the divinely-imposed faith a human faith resting on experience“.
As St. Vincent of LĂ©rins warned, true doctrine “must necessarily be held by all always and everywhere” (Commonitorium). The conciliar sect’s scripture project – severed from Tradition, magisterium, and sacramental life – builds not the Kingdom of Christ, but the digital Babel of Antichrist.
Source:
Pope: Young people need easy access to Sacred Scripture (vaticannews.va)
Date: 17.11.2025