EWTN News reports that Spain’s Congress of Deputies is advancing a bill to “fast-track” euthanasia appeals, reducing judicial review to a single hearing before funneling cases to the Constitutional Court—which rejects 98% of such appeals. The legislation comes just months after the euthanasia of 25-year-old Noelia Castillo, whose father, Javier Castillo, has now spoken publicly for the first time through the Christian Lawyers Foundation. His testimony reveals a family systematically excluded from the process, a daughter who “deceived” doctors into meeting the legal criteria, and a state that proved “very efficient” at administering death while offering inadequate resources for psychological treatment. The timing is particularly striking: just three days before this legislative push, members of Spain’s parliament gave a seven-minute standing ovation to the antipope Leo XIV, who rhetorically asked about the value of life—words that ring hollow before a legislature actively dismantling the last procedural safeguards against state-sanctioned killing.
The Efficiency of Death Versus the Inefficiency of Care
Javier Castillo’s testimony lays bare the grotesque asymmetry at the heart of Spain’s euthanasia regime. He stated that “more resources could have been allocated” to address his daughter’s psychological and psychiatric ailments, yet the state was “very efficient” when it came to administering euthanasia—essentially “to get the problem off their hands.” This is not mere bureaucratic indifference; it is the logic of a state that has embraced the culture of death as social policy. When a government finds it easier to kill its citizens than to treat them, we have arrived at what St. Pius X condemned as the modernist inversion of the natural order: the state as dispenser of death rather than protector of life.
The proposed “fast-track” legislation would mandate a single hearing in a lower court, bypassing trial courts and provincial courts entirely, with appeals only possible through an “amparo” appeal to the Constitutional Court—a remedy rejected in 98% of cases. This is not reform; it is the systematic elimination of due process for the purpose of accelerating killing. The legislative machinery operates with the same cold efficiency that Castillo observed in his daughter’s death.
The Exclusion of the Family: A Totalitarian Logic
Castillo recounted that when members of the Guarantees Committee arrived at Noelia’s room before her death, “they kicked me out of the room” and refused to provide information when he asked for it. This is the inevitable consequence of a legal framework that treats euthanasia as an individual “right” rather than what it actually is: the deliberate killing of a human person. The family—those bound by natural law and divine command to protect the vulnerable—is systematically excluded because the family represents the last obstacle to the state’s monopoly on the administration of death.
Castillo’s anguish is palpable: “The moment she saw that her father was opposed, that I was trying to stop the euthanasia, she completely cut me off, even though up until then, I had been with her every day of the week.” This is the fruit of a culture that has severed the bonds of natural affection and replaced them with the ideology of autonomous self-destruction. The young woman was isolated from her family, manipulated by a system that presented death as liberation, and her father—who had devoted himself to her care—was cast out at the final moment.
The Standing Ovation: Hypocrisy as State Policy
The article notes that just three days before the legislative debate, members of both houses of Spain’s legislature gave a seven-minute standing ovation to the antipope Leo XIV, who asked: “If life ceases to be recognized as a fundamental value, what future can our societies have?” The question is rhetorically sound; the context renders it obscene. A legislature that applauds rhetorical questions about the value of life while simultaneously advancing legislation to streamline the killing of its citizens has reached a depth of hypocrisy that can only be described as demonic.
This is the fruit of the conciliar revolution’s embrace of religious liberty and dialogue with the world. The antipope can speak of “fundamental values” in the abstract while the structures he presides over offer no substantive resistance to the culture of death. The standing ovation is not an affirmation of Catholic teaching; it is a performance of moral seriousness designed to obscure the reality of systemic apostasy. As Pius XI taught in *Quas Primas*, the reign of Christ the King extends to all nations and all aspects of public life—including the laws that govern the sanctity of human life. A state that legalizes euthanasia and then applauds an antipope’s rhetorical questions about the value of life is not seeking reconciliation with Christ; it is mocking Him.
The Legal Battle: Two Years of Life
Castillo expressed his conviction that “my daughter is now in heaven,” while acknowledging that the legal battle “gave to me two years of my daughter’s life. Two years. Do you know what two years of life means? A lot. A whole lifetime.” This is a profound theological truth: every moment of life is a gift from God, and the fight to preserve it—even when ultimately unsuccessful—has redemptive value. The proposed “fast-track” legislation would eliminate even this slender mercy, ensuring that future families have no opportunity to fight for the lives of their loved ones.
The Christian Lawyers Foundation, which supported Castillo’s legal battle, represents a rare example of Catholic resistance to the culture of death in the public square. Yet even here, one must ask: where are the bishops? Where is the institutional Church in Spain? The silence of the hierarchy is deafening. The “bishops” of the conciliar sect have abandoned the faithful to the wolves, content to issue vague statements about “accompaniment” and “mercy” while the state machinery of death grinds on.
The Theological Reality: Euthanasia as Sacrilege
From the perspective of integral Catholic faith, euthanasia is not a “right” or a “medical procedure”; it is the deliberate killing of an innocent human person, a grave violation of the Fifth Commandment, and a sacrilege against the sovereignty of God over life and death. As the *Catechism of the Council of Trent* teaches: “The fifth commandment forbids not only the commission of murder, but also the omission of all possible means of preserving life.” The state that legalizes euthanasia does not merely permit evil; it becomes an accomplice in it.
The proposed “fast-track” legislation is the logical endpoint of a process that began with the legalization of euthanasia in 2022. Once the principle is accepted that the state may authorize the killing of its citizens, the only remaining question is one of procedure. The answer, as Spain demonstrates, is to remove every obstacle—judicial review, family opposition, public scrutiny—until the process is as efficient and frictionless as possible. This is the logic of the abattoir, applied to human beings.
Conclusion: The Abomination of Desolation
The case of Noelia Castillo and the proposed “fast-track” legislation in Spain are not isolated incidents; they are symptoms of a civilization that has rejected Christ the King and embraced the culture of death. The standing ovation given to the antipope Leo XIV is not a sign of hope; it is a sign of how deeply the conciliar revolution has compromised the Church’s witness in the world. The “bishops” and “priests” of the conciliar sect offer no resistance, no prophetic voice, no defense of the innocent. They have become, in the words of Our Lord, “whitewashed tombs”—outwardly appearing to honor life while inwardly collaborating with its destruction.
The faithful must reject the entire conciliar apparatus—its antipopes, its “bishops,” its “sacraments,” its “teaching”—and return to the immutable Tradition of the Catholic Church. Only in the true Church, founded by Christ and preserved in the deposit of faith, can the faithful find the spiritual resources to resist the culture of death and bear witness to the sanctity of human life. The fight for Noelia Castillo’s life was a testament to the power of faith in the face of overwhelming odds. Let it serve as a reminder that the battle is not yet lost—but it will be, if the faithful continue to place their trust in the structures of the neo-church rather than in the unchanging truth of Catholic doctrine.
Source:
Father of euthanized 25-year-old Spanish woman speaks out as new bill aims to ‘fast track’ appeals (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 12.06.2026