The Catholic News Agency portal (November 17, 2025) reports that antipope Robert Prevost (“Leo XIV”) sent a message to the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors, claiming he holds this issue “deep in his heart.” The usurper of Peter’s throne spoke of dignity as “a gift from God” reflected in every human face, urging communities to become “examples of trust and dialogue.” This performance of concern stands in stark contradiction to the conciliar sect’s systemic enabling of predators while dismantling the Church’s supernatural foundations.
Theological Substitution of Grace for Naturalism
The antipope’s statement that “dignity is a gift from God… born from the loving gaze with which God has loved us” constitutes a Modernist distortion of Catholic anthropology. Pius XII in Mystici Corporis (1943) teaches that true dignity flows from incorporation into Christ through baptismal grace, not some vague “loving gaze” detached from the sine qua non of sacramental life. By omitting all reference to original sin, sanctifying grace, or the necessity of the sacraments, Prevost reduces human dignity to Rousseauian sentimentalism. As the Syllabus of Errors condemns: “In the present day it is no longer expedient that the Catholic religion should be held as the only religion of the State” (Error 77) – this same religious indifferentism now infects the conciliar sect’s anthropology.
Sacrilegious Usurpation of Ecclesiastical Authority
The so-called “Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors” operates without canonical mandate. Pius X’s Sacra Tridentina Synodus (1908) established that only the Holy Office holds competence over delicts against faith and morals. This pseudo-commission embodies the conciliar revolution’s destruction of canonical order, replacing the Church’s judicial framework with bureaucratic theater. The article’s reference to “accountability… for the protection processes undertaken” exposes the neo-church’s adoption of corporate crisis management techniques wholly alien to canon law. Where the 1917 Code prescribed latae sententiae excommunication for clerics who solicited in confession (Canon 2368), the conciliar sect creates talking shops that substitute “dialogue” for justice.
Systematic Omission of Supernatural Remedies
Nowhere does Prevost mention the Mass, sacramental confession, or the Four Last Things – the very means by which the Church historically protected souls. Compare this silence with Pius XI’s encyclical Divini Illius Magistri (1929): “Education consists essentially in preparing man for what he must be and for what he must do here below, in order to attain the sublime end for which he was created.” The antipope’s exclusive focus on creating “communities of trust” reduces the Church’s mission to social engineering, abandoning her divine mandate to “teach all nations” (Matthew 28:19). This naturalism fulfills St. Pius X’s warning in Pascendi that Modernists would reduce religion to “a certain kind of intuition and sentiment” (n.14).
Rhetorical Strategy of Emotional Manipulation
Prevost’s language follows the conciliar playbook of substituting theological precision with therapeutic buzzwords:
“Where justice is lived with mercy, the wound is transformed into an opening for grace”
This meaningless psychobabble masks the absence of concrete measures. Contrast this with the 1917 Code’s precise canonical procedures (Canons 1933-1951) for adjudicating clerical crimes. The repeated emphasis on “listening” and “accompanying” constitutes what Professor Plinio Corrêa de Oliveira identified as the Revolution’s tactic of “softening through ambiguity” – using emotional language to disarm doctrinal resistance.
Continuation of Bergoglian Heresies
The article’s claim that consecrated life is “called to be a welcoming home” continues Francis-Bergoglio’s destruction of religious life. Pius XII’s Sponsa Christi (1950) mandated cloister for contemplative orders precisely to protect spiritual maternity. Prevost’s call for “communities that protect dignity” completes the secularization of religious life begun by Paul VI’s Ecclesiae Sanctae (1966), which dissolved the distinction between contemplative and active orders. This explains why the conciliar sect’s “protection” efforts focus exclusively on psychological and legal mechanisms while ignoring the primary cause of abuse: the collapse of ascetic discipline and loss of faith in the Real Presence.
As the Lamentabili Sane condemned the Modernist tenet that “truth changes with man” (n.58), so Prevost’s empty performative activism reveals the conciliar sect’s fundamental apostasy. The true Church continues Her immemorial work of sanctification through the traditional sacraments and doctrine – the only authentic “protection” against all spiritual and temporal evils.
Source:
Pope Leo XIV holds protection of minors ‘deep in his heart’ (catholicnewsagency.com)
Date: 17.11.2025