National Catholic Register reports that the encyclical Magnifica Humanitas by the antipope Leo XIV is being used as a tool to shape U.S. policy on artificial intelligence. The article presents this intervention as a positive development, a voice of “reason and compassion” in a complex technological landscape. This collaboration between the structures occupying the Vatican and the American political class is not a defense of human dignity, but a manifestation of the post-conciliar church’s mission to establish a naturalistic, globalist order, bypassing the supernatural mission of the true Church. The focus on “guardrails” and “regulations” is a classic tactic of the Antichurch, which seeks to build a paradise on earth through bureaucratic control, while remaining silent on the true dangers to the soul: sin, heresy, and the loss of the true Faith.
The Silence on the True Danger: Modernism as the Ultimate Algorithm
The entire discussion around AI ethics, as framed by Leo XIV and his followers, is a masterclass in missing the point for the sake of worldly relevance. The article quotes the antipope’s call for “adequate regulatory tools capable of upholding justice and curving the distorting effects of technological power.” This language is pure, undiluted naturalism. It treats a technological tool as a primary threat, while the modernist apostasy that has gutted the Church is treated as a non-issue. Where is the call for “guardrails” against the algorithmic spread of heresy from the Vatican? Where is the “independent oversight” for the modernist catechesis that has led millions to perdition?
The true “distorting effect” is not in a machine, but in the modernist mind that created it and now seeks to use it. The encyclical Pascendi Dominici gregis of St. Pius X diagnosed the modernist as one who “subordinates” religion to human experience and science. Leo XIV’s foray into AI policy is the perfect fulfillment of this. He acts as a global ethicist for a technological society, not as the Vicar of Christ warning of eternal damnation. The “compassion” he offers is a worldly, therapeutic compassion that seeks to mitigate the temporal discomforts of a fallen world, while offering no remedy for the sin that is its cause. This is the “Church” of Antichrist: a humanitarian NGO that uses religious language to baptize the projects of the secular world.
The “Common Good” as a Substitute for the Supernatural End
The article’s framing of the issue reveals the core modernist heresy: the reduction of the Church’s mission to the temporal sphere. The goal is to ensure AI “works for the good of all humanity,” a phrase that is meaningless outside the context of man’s supernatural end. For the post-conciliar sect, the “common good” is stripped of its Catholic meaning—the right ordering of man to God—and replaced with a materialistic vision of comfort, safety, and economic stability.
This is a direct contradiction of the teaching of Pope Pius XI in Quas Primas: “His reign, namely, extends not only to Catholic nations… but His reign encompasses also all non-Christians, so that most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ.” The primary problem of humanity is not unregulated AI; it is the rejection of the Kingship of Christ by individuals and nations. A “guardrail” on a chatbot is a pathetic substitute for the law of God. The modernist project, as exposed in Lamentabili sane exitu, is the “development of dogmas” to correspond with the “advancement of human reason” and the “progress of the sciences.” Leo XIV’s AI encyclical is a quintessential modernist document, applying the “spirit” of the Gospel to a contemporary issue while completely ignoring the unchanging dogmas that condemn the naturalistic spirit of the age.
Collaboration with a Hostile State: The Americanist Heresy
The enthusiasm of the USCCB and the Minnesota Catholic Conference for collaborating with the U.S. government is a stark illustration of the Americanist heresy condemned by Pope Leo XIII. They seek to make the Church “relevant” to the powers of this world, baptizing their political projects as “bipartisan” and “faith-based.” Anthony Granado of the USCCB states, “I would say everyone I talked to is excited about Pope Leo and they’re excited about the Catholic Church.” This is the language of a lobbyist, not a shepherd of souls. The Church is not meant to be “exciting” to the political class of a secular republic; she is meant to be a sign of contradiction, preaching the truth that offends both the left and the right.
The support for bills like the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) is a perfect example. While protecting children from genuine harms is a legitimate concern for parents, the Church’s role is not to become a consultant for the regulatory state. The true protection for children is a Catholic education, the sanctity of the family, and the sacramental life. By focusing on legislative “guardrails,” the USCCB implicitly accepts the premise that the state, not the family and the Church, is the primary guardian of children. This is a direct assault on the principle of subsidiarity and a surrender to the very laicism that Pope Pius XI condemned as a “public apostasy” in Quas Primas.
The Masonic Blueprint: A Global Ethical Framework
The call for a universal “ethical framework” for AI is not a Catholic concept; it is a Masonic one. The post-conciliar church has always sought to provide a religious veneer for the globalist project of a one-world government. The “synodality” and “dialogue” that characterize the post-Vatican II era are the ecclesiastical equivalents of the Masonic lodge, where all dogmas are set aside in favor of a common, naturalistic goal.
The article notes that the encyclical calls on “all levels of society” to take part. This is the language of global governance, not of the Catholic Church, which calls all nations to submit to the Kingship of Christ, not to a bureaucratic regulatory framework. The “independent oversight” demanded by Leo XIV is a hallmark of the totalitarian impulse, a demand for a global authority to enforce a naturalistic ethic. This is the “robust legal framework” of the Antichrist, a system that will eventually be used to persecute the true Church, just as the “legal frameworks” of the past were used to persecute Catholics in Mexico and Spain.
The collaboration between the structures occupying the Vatican and the U.S. political class is a marriage of convenience. The modernists get a veneer of moral authority for their regulatory state, and the politicians get the cover of the Church’s “social teaching.” The true Church, which endures in the faithful who profess the integral Catholic faith, has no part in this. Her mission is not to regulate the tools of a godless world, but to call all men to conversion, repentance, and the true Faith, for it is “not by the regulation of machines, but by the grace of Christ that souls are saved.” The ultimate “guardrail” is the law of God, and the only true “ethical framework” is the unchanging doctrine of the Catholic Church, which the modernists have abandoned.
[The full article content as processed above]
Source:
Pope Leo XIV’s Call for AI Guardrails Is Resonating on Capitol Hill (ncregister.com)
Date: 25.06.2026